No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Judicial Perspective on The Sacred in Society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2008
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The primary virtue of establishment is the Church's duty under law to minister to anyone at all who may turn to it, including the ungodliest. Establishment does not imply a religious State, that is a State whose law requires subservience by the citizens to the State religion; if it did, it would be barbarous (but contrast the Black Rubric in the Book of Common Prayer). Establishment does not entail State control of the Church. The legal characteristics of establishment are as follows. (1) The law of the Church of England is part of the law of the land. (2) Bishops and some other office-holders are appointed by the Queen on ministerial advice. (3) 26 diocesan bishops sit as legislators in the House of Lords. (4) The Queen as Supreme Governor acts as monarch for the Church as she acts as monarch for the State. The Church of England is not a “congregational” church: its forms of worship are prescribed by law, and are not at the liberty of the community worshipping in any particular church. The bishops' resolution which authorised the use of the 1928 revision of the Book of Common Prayer in face of the will of Parliament (which was the lawful authority in the matter) was a lamentable disobedience to the law which it was their duty to uphold. Such a legal transgression might possibly nowadays be subject to correction by the High Court on judicial review, though that would require departure from earlier high authority. However that may be, it has to be recognised that there is no room, in the practice of an established Church, for the notion that conscience might justify disobedience to the law. The conscience of the believer is worth no more than the conscience of an unbeliever. The established Church possesses two immeasurable virtues: first, that religion is no tyrant: belief is not compulsory; second, that the Church's ministration is available to everyone. Their unified effect is a great force for good.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2004
References
1 SPCK. 2001.Google Scholar
2 p 16.Google Scholar
3 P Avis Church, State and Establishment (SPCK. 2001), Preface, p ix.Google Scholar
4 D McClean, ‘The Changing Legal Framework of Establishment’ is reproduced at page 292 of this volume.Google Scholar
5 Bishoprick Papers (OUP 1946), p. 90.Google Scholar
6 Church. State and Establishment, p 34.Google Scholar
7 Church, State and Establishment, p 15.Google Scholar
8 Wylde v Attorney-General for New South Wales, ex rel Ashelford (1948) 78 CLR 224 at 256.Google Scholar
9 ‘Consecration, Ius Liturgicum and the Canons’. chapter 7 of N Doe Hill, M and Ombres, R (eds), English Canon Law: Essay in Honour of Bishop Eric Kemp (University of Wales Press, 1998). p 76.Google Scholar
10 Briden, T and Hanson, B, Moore's Introduction to English Canon Law (3rd edn) (Mowbray, 1992). p 58.Google Scholar See also Re St Peter and St Paul, Leckhampton [1968] P 495 at 498A-B. Gloucester Cons Ct.
11 Re Lapford (Devon) Parish Church [1954] p 416 at 424, Exeter Cons Ct.Google Scholar
12 Re Lapford (Devon) Parish Church [1955] p 205 at 210–211. Ct of Arches.Google Scholar
13 at p. 213.Google Scholar
14 ‘Judicial Review of Ecclesiastical Courts’: chapter 10 of English Canon Law, cited in note 9 above, Scholarly indeed, although Hill inexplicably categorises the Crown Court as an inferior court: p 110.Google Scholar
15 Transcript, 7B.Google Scholar
16 ‘Judicial Review of Ecclesiastical Courts’: chapter 10 of English Canon Law, cited in note 9 above, p. 114.Google Scholar
You have
Access