Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:04:28.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faith in Public Debate: On Freedom of Expression, Hate Speech and Religion in France & The Netherlands Esther Janssen Intersentia Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 2015, School of Human Rights Research Series 68, xix + 637 pp (paperback €98) ISBN: 978-1-78068-309-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2018

Richard Mullender
Richard Mullender*
Affiliation:
Newcastle Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 96 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5 See, for example, Mullender, R, ‘Hate speech, human rights, and G.W.F. Hegel’ in Cushman, T (ed), Handbook of Human Rights (New York, 2012)Google Scholar, ch 4, identifying hate, intention, an invidious ground, harm or the attempt to cause harm, and political significance as features of hate speech.

6 Berlin, I, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford, 1969)Google Scholar, p lv.

7 Klemperer, V, The Language of the Third Reich: LTI – lingua tertii imperii (London, 2006), pp 149–150 Google Scholar.

8 D Murray, ‘Europe signs its own death warrant’, Sunday Times, 30 April 2017, p 31.

9 Handyside v United Kingdom, ECtHR app no 6538/74, 26 April 1979 at para 79.

10 Goodhart, D, The Road to Somewhere: the populist revolt and the future of politics (London, 2017), p 69Google Scholar.

11 Ibid.