Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:54:55.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parliamentary Report

October 2010–January 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Frank Cranmer
Frank Cranmer
Affiliation:
Fellow, St Chad's College, Durham Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How liberal democracies can accommodate tenaciously-held religious views within the wider framework of human rights legislation and balance the resulting conflicts is a conundrum that confronts governments throughout Europe and was the theme of three major speeches delivered at the end of the period under review.

Type
Parliamentary Report
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 216 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 European Commission Press Release SPEECH/11/32 19 January 2011 available at <;http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/11/32>, accessed 29 January 2011.

2 Extract available at <http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/1821854>, accessed 29 January 2011.

3 Available at <http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/transcript-baroness-warsi%E2%80%99s-sternberg-lecture-speech>, accessed 29 January 2011.

4 Melanie Phillips: ‘Just whose side is Baroness Warsi on?’ The Spectator, 20 January 2011.

5 James Chapman: ‘Baroness Warsi triggers backlash over “Islamophobia”’ Daily Mail, 20 January 2011.

6 Available at <http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/genaff/119404.pdf> accessed 23 February 2011.

7 SSI/2011/44 available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2011/44/made> accessed 31 January 2011.

8 (2011) Ecc LJ 79–80.

9 See Northern Ireland Assembly Official Report 9 December 2010: Charities (Amendment) Bill: Accelerated Passage: Ministerial Briefing.

10 SR/2011/11 available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2011/11/made>, accessed 31 January 2011.

11 SR/2011/12 available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2011/12/made>, accessed 31 January 2011.

12 (2011) Ecc LJ 81.

13 HC Deb 14 Dec 2010 c 710W.

14 HC Deb 18 Jan 2011 c 679.

15 HC Deb 27 Mar 2009 c 629.

16 HL Deb 10 Jan 2011 cc 1169 ff.

17 HL Deb 10 January 2011 c 1170.

18 (2011) Ecc LJ 81–82.

19 See <http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3203>, accessed 31 January 2011.

20 See <http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1082251113&lang=en&r.i=1084590558&r.t=CAMPAIGN&type=RESOURCES>, accessed 31 January 2011.

21 Available at <http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Charity_requirements_guidance/Charity_governance/Good_governance/equality_act_summary.aspx>, accessed 29 January 2011.

22 That is, funds which have been given by the donor for a particular specified purpose – as opposed to general funds that may be applied to any purpose within the charity's objectives.

23 See Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) v Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2010] EWHC 520 (Ch) (17 March 2010) and Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) [2010] Ch Comm E & W (21 July 2010, published 19 August 2010).

24 Government Equalities Office News, 17 November 2010.