No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
February–May 2012
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2012
On 27 March the House of Commons debated the policy guidelines of the Director of Public Prosecutions on prosecutions for encouraging or assisting suicide. The debate, introduced by Richard Ottaway (Conservative) and David Winnick (Labour), was broadly supportive of the guidelines. The motion was amended and the House resolved to welcome the policy guidelines and to encourage ‘further development of specialist palliative care and hospice provision’.
1 See HC Deb 27 March 2012 c 1363ff.
2 For the consultation document see <http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/S4_MembersBills/Final_version_as_lodged.pdf>, accessed 29 April 2012.
3 Available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/enacted>, accessed 28 December 2011.
4 Available at <http://www.frc.org.uk/images/uploaded/documents/PN11_%20March%202012%20Revised.pdf>, accessed 28 April 2012.
5 Available at <http://www.frc.org.uk/images/uploaded/documents/Bulletin2010_2%20March%202012%20FINAL1.pdf>, accessed 28 April 2012.
6 Available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/2661/made>, accessed 29 April 2012 and see also (2012) 14 Ecc LJ 294.
7 Government Equalities Office, ‘Equal civil marriage: a consultation’, available at <http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/about-us/consultations/equal-civil-marriage/consultation-document?view=Binary>, accessed 29 April 2012.
8 ‘Registration of civil partnerships, same sex marriage and related issues’, available at <http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/09/05153328/0>, accessed 29 April 2012.
9 Joint Committee on the Draft House of Lords Reform Bill, ‘First report: draft House of Lords Reform Bill’, HL Paper 284–I, HC 1313–I (London: TSO 2012), available at <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201012/jtselect/jtdraftref/284/284i.pdf>, accessed 29 April 2012.
10 Ibid, p 161.
11 House of Lords Reform: an alternative way forward: a report by members of the Joint Committee of Both Houses of Parliament on the Government's draft House of Lords Reform Bill, available at <http://www.houseoflordsreform.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FinalPrint19042012-3.pdf>, accessed 1 May 2012.
12 See Scottish Government, Your Scotland, Your Referendum (Edinburgh, 2012)Google Scholar available at <http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0038/00386122.pdf>, accessed 1 May 2012.
13 Available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/992/made>, accessed 29 April 2012.
14 For the interlocutory proceedings, see Nadia Eweida and Shirley Chaplin v United Kingdom Application no 48420/10 (ECtHR 12 April 2011).
15 HL Deb 22 March 2012 c WA 191.
16 Pickles, Eric, ‘Wearing of Christian symbols at work’, DCLG Newsroom Responses, 16 April 2012Google Scholar, available at <http://www.communities.gov.uk/issuesandresponses/newsroom/2131296>, accessed 29 April 2012.
17 Available at <http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/gift_aid/declarations.htm#2>, accessed 29 April 2012.
18 Available at <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/993/made>, accessed 29 April 2012.
19 R (on the application of the National Secular Society and Another) v Bideford Town Council [2012] EWHC 175 (Admin), available at <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/175.html>, accessed 28 April 2012.