Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:24:47.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual Cups? Law, Ecclesiology and Eucharist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2010

Colin Buchanan
Affiliation:
Assistant Bishop, Diocese of Bradford

Extract

I write after the advice of the archbishops in July 2009 on restricting the use of the common cup has been withdrawn. It came under attack during its period of currency, not only on the grounds that it was medically quite unnecessary, but also on the interesting grounds that it was in violation of the Sacrament Act 1547. The Act concedes that the distribution of the cup would be the norm ‘except necessity otherwise require’. The swine flu alarm raised the issue of how to handle the necessity. This Comment arises from the alternatives which were then commended – intinction or distribution in one kind (bread) only (hereafter called ‘one-kind’). The discussion here concerns solely the duties of officiants at Holy Communion, and does not do more than touch in passing on how an individual communicant may respond.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Legal Opinions Concerning the Church of England, (eighth edition, London, 2007), pp 345–348.

3 See Sagovsky, N, ‘Swine flu must not guide belief’, Church Times, 25 September 2009Google Scholar.

4 In the Spirit of the Covenant, pp 44–46