Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:28:35.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Memory-Reduction Method for Pricing American-Style Options under Exponential Lévy Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Raymond H. Chan  and
Tao Wu
Raymond H. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
Tao Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper concerns the Monte Carlo method in pricing American-style options under the general class of exponential Lévy models. Traditionally, one must store all the intermediate asset prices so that they can be used for the backward pricing in the least squares algorithm. Therefore the storage requirement grows like , where m is the number of time steps and n is the number of simulated paths. In this paper, we propose a simulation method where the storage requirement is only . The total computational cost is less than twice that of the traditional method. For machines with limited memory, one can now enlarge m and n to improve the accuracy in pricing the options. In numerical experiments, we illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of our method by pricing American options where the log-prices of the underlying assets follow typical Lévy processes such as Brownian motion, lognormal jump-diffusion process, and variance gamma process.

Keywords

American optionsMonte Carlo simulationmemory reductionexponential Lévy processes
Type
Research Article
Information
East Asian Journal on Applied Mathematics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 20 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Amin, K.I., Jump diffusion option valuation in discrete time, Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), pp.1833–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Processes of normal inverse Gaussian type, Finance and Stochastics, 2 (1997), pp. 41–68.Google Scholar
[3]Black, F. and Scholes, M., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), pp. 637–654.Google Scholar
[4]Boyle, P., Option: a Monte Carlo approach, Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (1977), pp. 323–338.Google Scholar
[5]Carr, P., Geman, H., Madan, D., and Yor, M., The fine structure of asset returns: an empirical investigation, Journal of Business, 75 (2002), pp. 305–332.Google Scholar
[6]Chan, R.H., Chen, Y. and Yeung, K.M., A memory reduction method in pricing American options, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 74 (2004), pp. 501–511.Google Scholar
[7]Chan, R.H., Wong, C.Y. and Yeung, K.M., Pricing multi-asset American-style options bymemory reduction Monte Carlo methods, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 179 (2006), pp. 535–544.Google Scholar
[8]Chapman, S. (1998), Fortran 90/95 for scientists and engineers, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[9]Chaudhary, S.K., American options and the LSM algorithm: quasi-random sequences and Brownian bridges, Journal of Computational Finance, 8 (2005), pp. 101–115.Google Scholar
[10]Cont, R., Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues, Quantitative Finance, 1 (2001), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
[11]Cont, R. and Tankov, P., Financial Modelling with Jump Processes, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London, 2004.Google Scholar
[12]Devroye, L., Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, Springer Verlag, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
[13]Glasserman, P., Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, Springer Verlag, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
[14]Hirsa, A. and Madan, D.B., Pricing American options under variance gamma, Journal of Computational Finance, 7 (2003), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
[15]Kou, S.G., A jump-diffusion model for option pricing, Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 1086–1101.Google Scholar
[16]Longstaff, F.A. and Schwartz, E.S., Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach, The Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), pp. 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Madan, D.B., Carr, P.P., and Chang, E.C., The variance gamma process and option pricing, European Finance Review, 2 (1998), pp. 79–105.Google Scholar
[18]Mandelbrot, B.B., The variation of certain speculative prices, Journal of Business, XXXVI (1963), pp. 392–417.Google Scholar
[19]Merton, R.C., Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), pp. 125–144.Google Scholar
[20]Moler, C., Numerical Computing with MATLAB, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2004.Google Scholar
[21]Park, S.K. and Miller, K.W., Random number generators: good ones are hard to find, Communications of the ACM, 31 (1988), pp. 1192–1201.Google Scholar
[22]Ribeiro, C. and Webber, N., A Monte Carlo method for the normal inverse Gaussian option valuation model using an inverse Gaussian bridge, working paper, Cass Business School, City University, 2003.Google Scholar
[23]Ribeiro, C. and Webber, N., Valuing path-dependent options in the variance gamma model by Monte Carlo with a gamma bridge, Journal of Computational Finance, 7 (2004), pp. 81–100.Google Scholar
[24]Wilmott, P., Howison, S., and Dewynne, J., The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
[25]Wolfram, S., The Mathematica Book, 4th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar