Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:03:11.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Method for Analysing Toponome Image Stacks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Andrei Barysenka ,
Andreas W. M. Dress  and
Walter Schubert
Andrei Barysenka*
Affiliation:
Department of Combinatorics and Geometry, CAS-MPG Partner Institute and Key Lab for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China and Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
Andreas W. M. Dress*
Affiliation:
Department of Combinatorics and Geometry, CAS-MPG Partner Institute and Key Lab for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China and Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
Walter Schubert*
Affiliation:
Molecular Pattern Recognition Research Group Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44 Magdeburg, 39120, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We present a technique to find threshold values that allows the user to separate signal from noise in fluorescence grey-level images. It can be classified as a purely comparative method based upon the amount of “Mutual Information” between two or more florescence images, and we apply it to stacks of such images produced using the newly-developed MELK technology. Our results are compared to results obtained by another research group using a quite different (completely independent and more technology-based) approach; and also to results obtained using Otsu's Thresholding Method, yet another completely distinct approach invented to separate foreground and background in a grey-level image, based on minimising “intra-class variance” [9,10]. The remarkably good agreement found suggests that our proposed comparative information based method not only accounts for the biological mechanisms governing cellular protein networks very well, but also (and probably much more importantly) shows that cells actually organise the spatial structure of their protein networks in a highly non-random fashion as might be expected – and thereby try to optimise their “mutual information content”, and thus most probably their efficiency.

Keywords

MELK technologyKullback-Leibler distancethreshold valuesnumerical optimization
Type
Research Article
Information
East Asian Journal on Applied Mathematics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 35 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Barysenka, A., Copula-Based Methods of Exploring Statistical Dependence Between Fluorescent Markers, PhD thesis, in preparation. Google Scholar
[2]Barysenka, A., An Information Theoretic Thresholding Method for Detecting Protein Colocalizations in Stacks of Fluorescence Images, J. Biotechnol. (2009), in press.Google Scholar
[3]Bode, M., Irmler, M., Friedenberger, M., May, C., Jung, K., Stephan, C., Meyer, H. E., Lach, C., Hillert, R., Krusche, A., Beckers, J., Marcus, K., Schubert, W., Interlocking transcriptomics, proteomics and toponomics technologies for brain tissue analysis in murine hippocampus, Proteomics, 8:1170–8 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4]Cover, T., Elements Of Information Theory, Wiley, 1991.Google Scholar
[5]Dress, A., Lokot, T., Pustyl'nikov, L.D., and Schubert, W., Poisson Numbers and Poisson Distributions in Subset Surprisology, Annals of Combinatorics 8, 473–485 (2004).Google Scholar
[6]Kullback, S., Information Theory and Statistics, Dover, 1968.Google Scholar
[7]Friedenberger, M., Bode, M., Krusche, A., Schubert, W., Fluorescence detection ofprotein clusters in individual cells and tissue sections by using toponome imaging system: sample preparation and measuring procedures, Nat. Protoc., 2:2285–94 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Nelsen, R., An Introduction to Copulas, Springer, 1999.Google Scholar
[9]Otsu, N., A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9:62–66 (1979).Google Scholar
[10]Otsu's method, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otsu's_method.Google Scholar
[11]Kullback-Leibler divergence, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kullback-Leibler_divergence.Google Scholar
[12]Schubert, W., Topological Proteomics, Toponomics, MELK-Technology, in Proteomics of Microorganisms, 83, Springer 2003.Google Scholar
[13]Schubert, W., Topological Proteomics Technology and Paradigm for Cell Invasion Dynamics, J. Theor. Med., 4:75–84 (2002).Google Scholar
[14]Schubert, W., Bonnekoh, B., Pommer, A. J., Philipsen, L., Böckelmann, R., Malykh, Y., Gollnick, H., Friedenberger, M., Bode, M., and Dress, A. W. M., Analyzing proteome topologyand function by automated multidimensional fluorescence microscopy, Nat Biotechnol, 24:1270–1278, 2006.Google Scholar
[15]Schubert, W., Human toponome project, Journal of Proteome Research, 7:1806 (2008).Google Scholar
[16]Schubert, W., The molecular face ofprostate cancer, Journal of Proteome Research, 8:2616 (2009).Google Scholar
[17]Schubert, W., Gieseler, A., Krusche, A., Hillert, R., Toponome mapping in prostate cancer: detection of2000 cell surface protein clusters in a single tissue section and cell type specific annotation by using a three symbol code, Journal of Proteome Research, 8:2696–2707 (2009).Google Scholar
[18]Schubert, W., Friedenberger, M., Bode, M., Krusche, A., Hillert, R.Functional architecture ofthe cell nucleus: towards comprehensive toponome reference maps ofapoptosis, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1783:2080–8 (2008).Google Scholar
[19]Schubert, W., Bode, M., Hillert, R., Krusche, A., Friedenberger, M.Toponomics and neurotopo-nomics: a new way to medical systems biology, Expert Rev. Proteomics, 5:361–9 (2008).Google Scholar
[20]Schubert, W., Breaking the biological code, Cytometry A, 71:771–2 (2007).Google Scholar
[21]Schubert, W., A three-symbol code for organized proteomes based on cyclical imaging ofprotein locations, Cytometry A, 71:352–60 (2007).Google Scholar
[22]Studeny, M., Vejnarova, J., The multi-information function as a tool for measuring stochastic dependence, Learning in Graphical Models, 261 (1998).Google Scholar
[23]Studeny, M., Vejnarova, J., Information theoretical approach to constitution and reduction of medical data, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 45:65–74 (1997).Google Scholar