Article contents
XXXII.—Note on Ectocarpus
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2012
Extract
The group of the Phæosporeæ was first recognised by Thuret in 1850. It includes algæ that vary greatly in size, habit, external appearance, and mode of branching, some possessing a flat thalloid appearance with or without a long stalk (e.g., Laminariæ), others being filamentous and much branched (e.g., Ectocarpus, Sphacelaria, Chordaria, &c). The great majority of the genera included in the group are marine or brackish water forms, but recently E. Flahault has described, under the name of Lithoderma fontanum, a fresh water species from the neighbourhood of Montpellier.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , February 1886 , pp. 589 - 600
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1886
References
page 589 note * Thuret, , “Recherches sur les zoospores des Algues,”s Ann. des Sci. Nat., series iii. vol. xiv. 1850 Google Scholar.
page 589 note † Comptes Rendus, xcviii. (1884), pp. 1389–1391 Google Scholar.
page 590 note * Traill, Monograph of the Algæ of the Firth of Forth, 1885.
page 590 note † Harvey, Phycologia Britannica.
page 590 note ‡ Thuret, loc. cit., pp. 235–236.
page 591 note * J. E. Areschoug, Algæ Scandinavicæ exsiccatæ, serei novæ, Feb. 4, 1862.
page 591 note † Agardh, J. G., Species, Genera, et Ordines Fucoidearum, Lundæ, 1848, p. 14 Google Scholar.
page 591 note ‡ Kütziug, Tab. Phyc., vol. v. pl. 50, ii.
page 591 note § Gobi, C., “Die Brauntange des Finnischen Meerbusens,” Mem. de l'Acad. Imp. des Sci. de Petersbourg, sept, serie, tome xxi. No. 9, 1874 Google Scholar.
page 591 note ∥ Farlow, W. G., “List of the Marine Algæ of the United States,” in Proc. Amer. Acad. of Arts and Sciences, vol. x. 2nd series, p. 351, 1875 Google Scholar.
page 591 note ¶ Harvey, loc. cit.
page 591 note ** Pringsheim, “Ueber den Gang der morphologischen Differenzirung in der Sphacelarien-Reihe.,” Abhandl. d. Konigl. Akad. der Wiss. zu Berlin, 1873.
page 592 note * Cohn, F., “Beiträge zur Physiologie der Elorideen,” Max Schultze's Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. iii. s. 41, 1867 Google Scholar.
page 592 note † Capt. Solier and Dr Derbés, Memoire sur la Physiologie des Algues, p. 67, pl. xxi. figs. 10–12.
page 592 note ‡ Magnus, , in Jahrbericht der Commission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere in Keil, fur die Jahre 1872–1873, Berlin, 1875 Google Scholar.
page 592 note § Harvey's, Phycologia Australica, vol. vi. 1862 Google Scholar.
page 592 note ∥ Nägeli, , Die neuern Algensystem, Zurich, 1847, p. 202, Tab. vi. fig. 1, s, s; 4, s, s. Google Scholar
page 592 note ¶ Prof. Wright, E. P. “On a Species of Rhizophydium parasitic on Species of Ectocarpus, &c.” Trans. Roy. Irish. Acad., vol. xxvi. August 1877 Google Scholar.
page 592 note ** Grunow, Reise S. M. F. Novara um die Erde. Botanik, Th. i. Algen, Tab. vi.
page 596 note * If rupture occurs here, it is attributable to the action of extrinsic and purely accidental causes.
page 597 note * Harvey, Phyc. Brit.
page 598 note * In this case direct rays of light were carefully excluded from the stage of the microscope.
page 598 note † Borzi, , Studi algologici, 117 pp. (9 pl.). Messina, 1883 Google Scholar.
page 599 note * Pringsheim, loc. cit., p. 169, 170.
page 599 note † Goebel, Bot. Zeit., 22nd March 1878.
- 11
- Cited by