Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T14:25:03.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVII.—On an Entoproctan Polyzoon (Barentsia benedeni) new to the British Fauna, with Remarks on Related Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

James Ritchie
James Ritchie
Affiliation:
Natural History Department, The Royal Scottish Museum.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In February 1909 Mr John Thompson, Hull, forwarded to me for identification, along with species of Hydroids, specimens of a “Pedicellina,” which he was unable to identify with any known British form. These specimens proved to be of particular interest; and although a first consignment was dead on arrival in Edinburgh, Mr Thompson was successful in obtaining additional specimens, which, having travelled safely, were kept under observation in a living state for a week, when they were preserved for more detailed examination. Cocaine was found to be the most successful narcotising agent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , 1911 , pp. 835 - 848
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 837 note * Robertson, Alice, “Studies in Pacific Coast Entoprocta,” Proc. Californian Acad. Sci., ser. 3, vol. ii., part 4, 1900, p. 339.Google Scholar

page 837 note † Ehlers, E., “Zur Kenntnis der Pedicellineen,” Abh. König. Ges. Wissensch. Göttingen, Bd. xxxvi., 1890, p. 16.Google Scholar

page 837 note ‡ See Harmer, S. F., “On the Structure and Development of Loxosoma,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. (N.S.), vol. xxv., 1885, p. 277, pi. xix. figs. 5 and 10.Google Scholar

page 838 note * Robertson, Alice, op. cit., p. 340.Google Scholar

page 838 note † Davenport, C. D., “On Urnatella gracilis,” Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., vol. xxiv., 1893, p. 11, pl. iii. fig. 18.Google Scholar

page 838 note ‡ Ehlers, E., op. cit., p. 64.Google Scholar

page 839 note * Harmer, S. F., op. cit., p. 270, pl. xix. flg. 1.Google Scholar

page 839 note † Foettinger, A., “Sur l'anatomie des Pédicellines de la côte d'Ostende,” Arch. Biol., vol. vii., 1886, p. 321, pl. x. fig. 18.Google Scholar

page 840 note * Sars, M., Beskrivelser og Iagaltagelser over nogle maerkelige eller nye i Habet ved den Bergenske Kyst lebende Dyr, Bergen, 1835, p. 6.Google Scholar

page 841 note * Hincks, T., A History of the British Marine Polyzoa, 1880, p. 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 841 note † Lomas, J., “Report on the Polyzoa of the L.M.B.C. District,” Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Liverpool, No. xl., 1886, p 190, pl. iii. fig. 2.Google Scholar

page 841 note ‡ Hilgendorf, , Trans. New Zealand Inst., vol. xxx., 1897 (1898), p. 218, pl. xxii.Google Scholar

page 842 note * van Beneden, , “Recherches sur l'anatomie, la physiologie et le développement des Bryozoaires, qui habitent la côte d'Osteiide,” Nouv. Mém. Acad. Roy. Bruxelks, t. xix., 1845, p. 24.Google Scholar

page 842 note † Gosse, P. H., A Naturalist's Rambles on the Devonshire Coast, London, 1853, p. 217.Google Scholar

page 842 note ‡ Jullien, J. and Calvet, L., “Bryozoaires provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle” (1886–1888), in Reés. camp. sci. Albert I. Monaco, fase, xxiii, p. 26, pi. ii. fig. 2.Google Scholar

page 842 note § See also Waters, A. W., in Reés. Voy. S.Y. Belgica: Zoologie, “Bryozoa,” Anvers, 1904, p. 100.Google Scholar

page 843 note * The mistake of ascribing Pedicellina belgica to P. cernua, in Jelly's, Synonymic Cat. of Recent Marine Bryozoa, London, 1889, p. 202, is obvious.Google Scholar

page 843 note † Ehlers, , op. cit., p. 43.Google Scholar

page 843 note ‡ Ehlers, , op. cit., p. 146.Google Scholar

page 843 note § Ehlers, , op. cit., p. 44.Google Scholar

page 844 note * Loppens, K., “Bryozoaires marins et fluviatiles de la Belgique,” Ann. Soc Boy. Zool. Malcie. Belgique, vol. xli., 1906 (1907), p. 300.Google Scholar

page 847 note * Davenport, C. B., “On Umettala gracilis,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xxiv., 1893, p. 8.Google Scholar