Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:59:30.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXII.—The Morphology of the Stele of Platyzoma microphyllum, R. Br.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

John M'Lean Thompson
John M'Lean Thompson
Affiliation:
Lecturer on Plant Morphology, Glasgow University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That the stelar problem considered in this paper may be more clearly visualised, it will be well to divest of purely theoretical considerations the facts of stelar structure already known for Platyzoma, and to summarise such structural features as bear on the subject in hand.

In the first account of Platyzoma given by Robert Brown in 1810 (l), the habit of the stem and heterophyllic leaves, and the general form and position of the sporangia, were alone described. But in 1832 (2) a rough analysis of the structure of the stem was added, and the tubular nature of its stele was recognised. No material contribution to the knowledge of the stelar structure was made until 1893 (3), when Dr Poirault described the histology of the stele as shown by a small fragment of stem. In this material there was a sclerotic pith completely surrounded by an endodermis, outside which lay a zone of parenchyma surrounded by a broad ring of parenchymatous xylem. At the periphery of the xylem there was a narrow zone of phloëm surrounded by a large-celled pericycle and an outer endodermis. Neither leaf-gaps nor perforations were found in the stele, and accordingly the complete isolation of the pith from the cortex was recognised.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 1920 , pp. 571 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Prodromus Floræ Novæ Hollandiæ et Insulæ Van Diemen.Google Scholar
(2)Plantæ Javanicæ Rariores.Google Scholar
(3) “Recherches sur les Cryptogames Vasculaires”, Ann. des Sci. Nat., Bot., 7e sér., tom. xviii.Google Scholar
(4) “Anatomy of the Gleicheniaceæ”, Annals of Botany, xv, 1901.Google Scholar
(5) “The Anatomy and Affinity of Platyzoma microphyllum, R. Br”., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. li, part iii, No. 20.Google Scholar
(6)Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Toronto, 1897 : Transactions of Section K, “The Morphology of the Central Cylinder in Vascular Plants”, by E. C. Jeffrey.Google Scholar
(7) “The Morphology of the Central Cylinder in the Angiosperme”, by E. C. Jeffrey, Transactions of the Canadian Institute.Google Scholar
(8)Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Series B, vol. cxcv, pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
(9) “Lectures on the Evolution of the Filicinean Vascular System”, New Phytologist reprint, No. 21.Google Scholar
(10)Botanical Gazette, October 1908.Google Scholar
(11)Botanical Gazette, 1910.Google Scholar
(12)The Anatomy of Woody Plants, 1917, p. 283.Google Scholar
(13) “A Further Contribution to the Knowledge of Platyzoma microphyllum, R. Br”., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lii, part i, No. 7, 1917.Google Scholar
(14)The Anatomy of Woody Plants, 1917, p. 281.Google Scholar
(15) “Comparative Anatomy of the Hyrnenophyllaceæ, Schizæaceæ, and Gleicheniaceæ”, Annals of Botany, xvii, 1903, p. 516.Google Scholar
(16) “Studies in the Morphology and Anatomy of the Ophioglossaceæ”, I, Annals of Botany, April 1913.Google Scholar
(17)Flora, 1910.Google Scholar
(18) “On LepidopMoios Scottii”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi, 1908.Google Scholar