Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:46:29.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

C. M. Yonge
C. M. Yonge
Affiliation:
Temporary Assistant Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Because of the superficial resemblance of the digestive diverticula of the Lamellibranchs, and of many other Invertebrates, to the liver of the Vertebrates, and the discovery in them of glycogen by Bernard (1855), they became known as the “liver.” Weber (1880) later introduced the name hepatopancreas as a result of his discovery of the secretory powers of the diverticula in the Crustacea. In spite of the fact that none of the constituents of bile has ever been discovered in the Invertebrates, and that the digestive diverticula are in no way analogous to the liver of the Vertebrates, as Jordan (1912) has shown in his review of the subject, the terms “liver” and “hepatopancreas,” as well as the less questionable designation “digestive gland,” are still generally used. Moreover, no attempt is made to distinguish between these organs in the different groups of Invertebrates although both their structure and function in, for example, the Lamellibranchs, Gastropods, Cephalopods, and Crustacea are totally different. In some cases they constitute a digestive gland; in others, including the Lamellibranchs, as I hope to show in this paper, their function is that of assimilation, and so they are most suitably designated digestive diverticula.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , 1926 , pp. 703 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, J. H., “On Larvæ of Lingula and Pelagodiscus,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., li, 1915, p. 45.Google Scholar
Bernard, C., Leçons de Physiologie Expérimental Appliquée à la Médecine, Paris, 1855.Google Scholar
Carazzi, D., “Ricerche sulle Ostriche verdi,” Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, xii, 1896, p. 381.Google Scholar
Carazzi, D., “Ricerche sull' assorbimento del ferro nel' Ostrea edulis L.,” Internat. Monatsschr. Anat. Hist., xiv, 1897, p. 117.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R., “The Anatomy and Histology of Ticks,” Gov. of India Sci. Memoirs, xxiii, Calcutta, 1906.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., “Études physiologiques sur lea Gastéropodes Pulmonés,” Arch. Biol., xii, 1892, p. 683.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., “Études physiologiques sur les Crustacés Décapodes,” Arch. Biol., xiii, 1895, p. 245.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L., “L'excrétion chez les Mollusques,” Arch. Biol., xvi, 1900, p. 49.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J., “Pecten,” L.M.B.C. Mem., xvii, 1909.Google Scholar
Enriques, P., “Il fegato dei Molluschi e le sue funzioni,” Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, xv, 1901, p. 281.Google Scholar
Fredericq, L., “La Digestion des Matières albuminoides chez quelques Invertébres,” Arch. Zool. Expér., vii, 1878, p. 391.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J., “Ueber die Mitteldarmdrüse (Leber) der Mollusken,” Arch. Mikr. Anat., xxv, 1885, p. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenzel, J., “Mikrographie der Mitteldarmdrüse (Leber) der Mollusken,” Nova Ada Acad. Leop. Carol., xlviii, 1886, p. 81.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J., “Specielle Morphologie des Drüsenepithels der Lamellibranchiaten, Prosobranchiaten und Opisthobranchiaten,” Nova Ada Acad. Leop. Carol., lx, 1893, p. 317.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., “On Digestion in Hydra,” Journ. Physiol., ix, 1888, p. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutheil, F., “Über den Darmkanal und die Mitteldarmdrüse von Anodonta cellensis,” Zeit. wiss. Zool., xcix, 1912, p. 444.Google Scholar
Heymann, J. A., De Voeding der Oester, 's Gravenhage, 1914.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., “Die Ernährungsbiologie fleischfressender Gastropoden,” Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Zool. u. Physiol., xxxv, 1915, p. 357.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., “Der Weg des resorbierten Eisens und des phagocytierten Carmins bei Murex trunculus,” Zeit. vergl. Physiol., ii, 1924, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., “Probleme der intraplasmatischen Verdauung,” Zeit. vergl. Physiol., iii, 1925, p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H., “Zur Frage nach der exkretiven Funktion der Mitteldarmdrüse bei Astacus fluviatilis,” Arch. ges. Physiol., cv, 1904, p. 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H., “Die ‘Leberfrage’ bei den wirbellosen Tieren,” Zool. Jahr., Suppl. 15, Bd. iii, 1912, p. 49.Google Scholar
Jordan, H., Vergleichende Physiologie d. Wirbelloser Tiere, Bd. L, Die Ernährung, Jena, 1913, p. 233.Google Scholar
Krijgsman, B. J., “Arbeitsrhythmus der Verdauungsdrüsen bei Helix pomatia,” Zeit. vergl. Physiol., ii, 1925, p. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, T., “Die Mytiliden,” Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, xxvii, 1902.Google Scholar
MacMunn, C. A., “On the Gastric Gland of Mollusca and Decapod Crustacea: its Structure and Functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., cxciii (B), 1900, p. 1.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. B., “The Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs,” Q.J.M.S., xliv, 1901, p. 591.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C., “On the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs,” Journ. Morph., xxxi, 1918, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, F. A., “The Structure and Function of the Liver of Teredo, the Shipworm,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (Biol. Sci.), i, 1923, p. 1.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E., “Digestion intracellular en un Acaro,” Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Natural, xviii, 1918, p. 258.Google Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, C., “Sur la fonction du foie des Crustacés et des Mollusques,” Revue Sc. N. Pétersbourg, iv, 1893, p. 114.Google Scholar
Sigerfoos, C. P., “Natural History, Organization, and late Development of the Teredinidæ, or Ship-worms,” Bull. U. S. Bur. Fisheries, Washington, xxvii, 1908, p. 191.Google Scholar
Steudel, A., “Absorption und Secretion im Darm von Insekten,” Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Zool. u. Physiol., xxxiii, 1913, p. 165.Google Scholar
Van Rynberk, G., “Sur le rôle fonctionnel du ‘Stylet crystallin’ des Mollusques,” Arch. Ital. Biol., xlix, 1908, p. 435.Google Scholar
Vonk, H. J., “Verdauungsphagocytose bei den Austern,” Zeit. vergl. Physiol., i, 1924, p. 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M., “Ueber den Bau und die Thätigkeit der sog. Leber der Crustaceen,” Arch. Mikr. Anat., xvii, 1880, p. 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., “The Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in the Lamellibranch Mya,” Brit. Journ. Exper. Biol., i, 1923, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., “The Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in Nephrops norvegicus,” Brit. Journ. Exper. Biol., i, 1924, p. 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., “The Hydrogen Ion Concentration in the Gut of certain Lamellibranchs and Gastropods,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Ass., N S., xiii, 1925, p. 938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar