Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:51:22.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVII.—Some Specimens of Stenomyelon and Kalymma from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Albert G. Long
Albert G. Long
Affiliation:
Berwickshire High School, Duns.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A Stem of Stenomyelon tuedianum Kidston is described with the base of a petiole of Kalymma tuediana Calder attached to it.

Two new species of Stenomyelon are described—Stenomyelon heterangioides, characterized by interspersed xylem parenchyma and mesarch protoxylem, and Stenomyelon primaevum distinguished by a solid tri-radiate protostele lacking parenchyma bands. The possible external features of Stenomyelon are compared with a compression of a Pteridosperm with large fronds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 65 , Issue 17 , 1963 , pp. 435 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Andrews, H. N., 1940. “On the Stelar Anatomy of the Pteridosperms, with particular reference to the Secondary Wood”, Ann. Mo. Bot. Gdn., 27, 51–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, M. G., 1938. “On Some Undescribed Species from the Lower Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire; together with a Note on the Genus Stenomyelon Kidston”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 59, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., 1923–1925. “Fossil Plants of the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., 2, 164; Pl. XXXIX, fig. 5.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., and Gwynne-Vaughan, D. T., 1912. “On the Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire. Part 1. Stenomyelon tuedianum Kidston”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 48, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., and Lang, W. H., 1923. “On Palœopitys milleri M'Nab”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 53, 415.Google Scholar
Kräusel, R., und Weyland, H., 1929. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Devonflora III”, Abh. Senckenb. Naturf. Ges., 41, 315–360.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1960. “On the Structure of Samaropsis scotica Calder (emended) and Eurystoma angulare gen. et sp. now, Petrified Seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 64, 268.Google Scholar
Oliver, F. W., and Scott, D. H., 1904. “On the Structure of the Palæozoic Seed Lagenostoma lomaxi etc.”, Phil. Trans., B, 197, 193–247.Google Scholar
Read, C. B., 1936. “The Flora of the New Albany Shale. Part 2. The Calamopityeae and their Relationships, Shorter Contributions to General Geology”, Prof. Pap. U.S. Geol. Surv., 186E, 81–104.Google Scholar
Scott, D. H., 1923. Studies in Fossil Botany. Part II, 141. 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, H. Grafen Zu, 1896. “Ueber die seinerzeit von Unger beschriebenen strukturbietenden Pflanzenreste des Unterculm von Saalfeld in Thüringen”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 23, 1–100.Google Scholar