Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:25:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XVIII.—On Pennella balænopteræ: a Crustacean, parasitic on a Finner Whale, Balænoptera musculus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Extract

In September 1903 I received a bottle containing twelve specimens of a large parasite presented to me by Mr Chr. Castberg, the manager of a Norwegian whaling company which has established a fishing station at Ronasvoe in the north of Shetland. In his letters Mr Castberg stated that the parasites were attached to a Finner whale, which, from its size, the mottled character of the whalebone and the pointed head, was obviously a Razorback—Balænoptera musculus. The parasites were numerous, and were fixed to the back of the whale, and the attached end penetrated through the skin into the blubber. Although Mr Castberg had seen many hundred whales, this is the first occasion on which he had met with this form of parasite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Baird, W., “On a new Species of Penella,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, vol. xix, p. 280, 1847.Google Scholar
Baird, W., “Natural History of British Entomostraca,” Ray Society, London, 1850.Google Scholar
Bassett-Smith, P. W., “Systematic Description of Parasitic Copepoda found on Fishes,” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., p. 482. 18th April 1899.Google Scholar
Van Beneden, P. J., “Animal Parasites and Messmates,” London, 1876.Google Scholar
Van Beneden, P. J., “Histoire naturelle des Balénoptères, Mémoires couronnés et autres Mémoires,” Acad. Roy. de Belgique, vol. xli, 1887.Google Scholar
De Blainville, , “Mémoire sur les Lernées,” in Journal de physique, de chimie et d'histoire naturelle, vol. xcv, p. 372 and p. 437, plate. 1822.Google Scholar
De Blainville, , Art. Lernæa, Dict. d. Scien. Nat., vol. xxvi p. 112. 1823.Google Scholar
Boccone, , “Recherches et Observations naturelles de Monsieur Boccone, Gentilhomme Sicilien,” figure opposite p. 284. Vingt-cinquième Lettre. Amsterdam, 1674.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H., “Beschreibung einiger neuen oder weniger bekannten Schmarotzerkrebse,” Nova acta physico-medica Acad. Coes. Leop. Carol., vol. xvii. p. 269. 1835.Google Scholar
Chamisso, and Eysenhardt, , Penella diotontis in Nova acta physico-medica Acad. Goes. Leop. Carol., vol. x, pl. xxiv. fig. 3, p. 350. 1821.Google Scholar
Claus, C., Elementary Text-book of Zoology, translated by Sedgwick, A. and Heathcote, F. G.. London, 1890.Google Scholar
Cuvier, , Les Penuelles. (Pennella, Oken.) Le Règne animal, vol. iii. p. 256. 1830.Google Scholar
Dekay, J. E., Observations on the Pennatule flèche (P. sagitta of La Marck) in the cabinet of Dr Mitchill. Silliman's American Journal of Science, vol. iv. p. 87. 1822.Google Scholar
Ellis, John, P. filosa and P. sagitta in Philosophical Transactions, vol. liii. fig. 16. 1763.Google Scholar
Gerstaecker, A., “Crustacea Spaltfüssler,” in Bronn's Thier-reichs, Bd. v. 1st Abth. Leipzig and Heidelberg, 18601879. Figured in Tab. vii., Penella sagitta and Penella varians.Google Scholar
Guéuin, , Iconograph. Zooph., pl. ix. fig. 3, quoted by Bassett-Smith.Google Scholar
Holten, , Acta danica, Naturhist. Skrifter, 136, pi. iii. fig. 3. Holmiæ, 1802.Google Scholar
Koren, J., and Danielssen, D. C., “On Pennella balænopteræ,” in Fauna littoralis Norvegix, 3rd part, plate xvi. p. 157. Bergen, 1877.Google Scholar
Kroyer, H., “Systematische Uebersicht der Schmarotzer Krebse,” Oken's Isis, 1840, p. 702 e.s.Google Scholar
Linnæus, C., System Naturæ, 10th ed., vol. i. p. 819, 1758; also a later edition, vol. i. parts vi., vii., pp. 3864, 3865.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, Mittheil. aus der Zoolog. Station zu Neapel, vol. i. p. 53. Leipzig, 1879.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, , Penellus. Crustaeés, vol. iii. p. 522. 1840.Google Scholar
Modeer, , Acta Suecica, 1786, p. 256, P. sagitta and filosa, quoted by von Nordmann.Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. von, Mikrographische Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der wirbellosen Thiere, zweites Heft. Berlin, 1832. Pennella sagitta, p. 121, pl. x. figs. 6, 7, 8.Google Scholar
Odhelius, J. L., Ghinensia lagerstromiana, published in a collection of Theses entitled “Amoenitates Academicæ of Linnæus,” vol. iv. p. 257, fig. 3. Holmiæ, 1759. He gives a description of P. sagitta. In the references which I have seen to this species it is made to appear as if it had been described by Linnæus himself, and the name of his pupil Odhelius is not given.Google Scholar
Oken, , Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte, 1815, part iii. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte, vol. v. part ii. p. 564; oder Thierreich, vol. ii. 2nd part. Stuttgart, 1835.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., “Beskrivelse af en ved Lofoten indbjerget Eørhval (Balænoptera musculus),” Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-selskabet i Christiana, p. 280. 1866.Google Scholar
Scott, Andrew, “Lepeophtheirus and Lernæa,” Memoirs of Liverpool Marine Biological Committee. London, 1901.Google Scholar
Steenstrup, and Lütken, , Orn Slægten Pennella, in Dansk. Vid. Selsk. Skriv., vol. v. p. 408, pl. xiv. 1861.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. M., “Parasitic Copepoda of New Zealand,” Trans. New Zealand Inst., vol. xxii. p. 353, pl. xxviii. fig. 2, 1889. Describes Pennella histiophori.Google Scholar
Turner, Wm., and Wilson, H. S., “On Chondracanthus lophii,” also “On Lernæopoda dalmanni,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxiii. p. 67, pl. iii. and p. 77, pl. iv. 1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. Perceval, “On a new species of the Genus Pennella,” Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 4th series, vol. v. p. 43, plate i. 1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conchoderma.

Darwin, C., Monograph on the sub-class Cirripedia. Part 1. The Lepadidæ. Ray Soc. London, 1851.Google Scholar
Hallas, Sophus, Vidensk. Medd. fra den Naturhist., vol. ix. Copenhagen, 1868.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, “Carcinologische Mittheil.,” p. 53. Mittheilung. aus der Zoolog. Station zu Neapel, vol. i. Leipzig, 1879.Google Scholar
Hoek, P. P. C., “Account of Conchoderma Virgatum, var. chelonophilus, obtained from the carapace of a Chelone,” Challenger Reports, part xxv. p. 55, pl. ii. figs. 13–15. 1883.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., Forhandling. i Vidensk. Selsk., p. 280. Christiania, 1866, also 1880.Google Scholar