Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:18:52.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XIX.—The Early Development of Cribrella oculata (Forbes), with Remarks on Echinoderm Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Arthur T. Masterman
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Zoology in the School of Medicine of the Royal Colleges, Edinburgh.

Extract

The breeding habits of this asterid have been noted by M. Sars, who has described the external features of the developmental stages. He observed the peculiar habit of ‘brooding.’ In the spring of 1840 he found several of the parents at very low-tide-mark fixed to stones in their brooding position. The species he examined is described as Echinaster sanguinolentus, and is apparently the same species, though he speaks of the ‘blood-red’ embryo, whereas my specimens were a light orange. They conform exactly to the tint of the oral surface of the parent. The time of breeding of Cribrella oculata at St Andrews appears to extend from February to April inclusive, and throughout this period the parents are found fairly plentifully, adhering to the under surface of rocks, nursing the masses of eggs or young under their bodies. This habit of protecting its young is also pursued by an allied species, Asterias mütteri, which is equally abundant in the same locality, but the breeding of which is effected earlier, i.e., in November and December. I hope to proceed with the study of this species in the near future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 373 note * Sars, M., Fauna Littoralis Norvegiæ, Erste Lieferung, Christiana, 1846, p. 47, Tab. 8, f. 1–37.Google Scholar

page 394 note * Grave, Caswell, Johns Hopkins Univ. Memoirs, ivGoogle Scholar.

page 394 note † Selenka, E., Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., Bd. xxviiGoogle Scholar.

page 394 note ‡ H. L., Clark, Johns Hopkins Univ. Memoirs, ivGoogle Scholar.

page 394 note § Fleischmann, A., Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., Bd. xlvi., 1888Google Scholar.

page 394 note ∥ Ludwig, H., “Entwicklungsgeschichte der Asterina gibbosa,” Zeitsch. w. Zool., vol. xxxvii., 1882Google Scholar.

page 394 note ¶ Jourdan, E., Ann. Sci., Nat. Series, 6, T. x., 1879–1880Google Scholar.

page 394 note ** Kowalewski, A., Jahresb. Anat. u. Physiol., 1873Google Scholar.

page 395 note * Appellöff, A., Bergen Museum, Aarbog, 1900Google Scholar.

page 395 note † Ludwig, H., “Entwicklungsgeschicte der Asterina gibbosaZeitsch. f. w. Zool., vol. xxxvii., 1882Google Scholar.

page 395 note ‡ MacBride, E. W., “Variations in the Larva of Asterina gibbosaPhilos. Soc. Camb., May 1894.Google Scholar

page 395 note § Goto, S., Journal of the College of Science, Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Japan, vol. x. pt. iii., 1898Google Scholar.

page 395 note ∥ Goto, S., ibid., vol. xii. pt. iii., 1898; and Annotationes Zool. Japonenses, vol. ii. pars iii., 1898Google Scholar.

page 395 note ¶ Bury, H., “Studies in the Embryology of Echinoderms,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., April 1889.Google Scholar

page 395 note ** Bury, H., “The Metamorphosis of Echinoderms,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. xxxviii. 9596Google Scholar.

page 397 note * Goto, S., Journal of the College of Science, Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Japan, vol. x. part iii., 1898Google Scholar; vol. xii. part iii., 1898.

page 397 note † Goto, S., ibid., vol. xii. part iii., 1898. We may note that he very clearly indicates the epigastric cœlom to be formed of one-half of the right posterior enterocœle.

page 398 note * Bury, H., “Sudies in the Embryology of Echinoderms,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., April 1889Google Scholar.

page 398 note † Field, G. W., “The Larva of Asterias vulgaris,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. xxxiv., 1894Google Scholar.

page 398 note ‡ Macbride, E. W., “The Development of Asterina gibbosa,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., xxxviii., 1895–1896Google Scholar.

page 398 note § Goto, S., Journal of the College of Science, Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Japan, vol. x. part iii., 1898Google Scholar.

page 400 note * Ludwig, H., “Entwicklungsgeschichte der Asterina gibbosa,” Zeitsch. f. w. Zool., vol. xxxvii., 1882Google Scholar.

page 400 note † Goto, S., Journal of the College of Science, Imp. Univ. Tokyo, Japan, vol. x. part iii., 1898Google Scholar.

page 403 note * This will be confirmed later by a description of its later changes. In the adult it has the relationship of a heart-vesicle or pericardial vesicle to the blood-vascular system, the presence of which, I hope, as indicated elsewhere, to show in detail later (Proc. Royal Physical Soc., March 1901).

page 403 note † Masterman, A. T., Natural Science, January 1899.

page 404 note * Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., Dec. 1898.

page 405 note * Bather, F. A., Journ. London Coll. Soc., viii. (pp. 2133), May 1901Google Scholar.

page 405 note † Masterman, A. T., Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., Dec. 1898, and Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Aug. 1897.

page 405 note ‡ Bütschli, O., “Versuch der Ableitung des Echinoderms aus einer bilateralen Urform,” Zeitsch. f. w. Zool., vol. liiiGoogle Scholar.

page 406 note * Bury, H., “The Metamorphosis of Echinoderms,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. xxxviii. 9596Google Scholar.

page 409 note * On the nomenclature usually adopted,

page 409 note † Grave, Caswell, Johns Hopkins Univ. Memoirs, ivGoogle Scholar.

page 410 note * Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., vol. clxxix., 1888Google Scholar.

page 410 note † Seeliger, O., Zool. Jahrb., Abth. Anat., 4, Bd. 6Google Scholar.

page 411 note * These figures seem to have their true axes of symmetry at 45° to those assumed by Bury.

page 411 note † Semon, R., “Die Entwicklung der Synapta digitata und die Stammes geschichte der Echinodermen,” Jen. Zeitsch. f. Naturwiss, vol. xxii., 1884Google Scholar.

page 411 note ‡ Clark, H. L., Johns Hopkins Univ. Memoirs, ivGoogle Scholar.

page 412 note * “The Development of Echinus esculentus,” Proc. Royal Soc., vol. lxix. No. 455.