Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:49:36.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—The Functional Morphology and Feeding Mechanism of the Chydorid Cladoceran Eurycercus lamellatus (O. F. Müller)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Geoffrey Fryer
Geoffrey Fryer
Affiliation:
Freshwater Biological Association, The Ferry House, Ambleside, Westmorland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Outstanding structural features related to habits of life in the chydorid cladoceran Eurycercus lamellatus are described. Crawling is as important as swimming in this deposit-feeding species. The nature of the food, its collection and subsequent manipulation, are described. Both cephalic and trunk appendages are involved in this process. Their structure and mode of action are described and illustrated in detail. Many hitherto unknown structural features are described and the functional significance of these and other morphological peculiarities is explained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 65 , Issue 14 , 1963 , pp. 335 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Binder, G., 1932. “Das Muskelsystem von Daphnia”, Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 26, 54–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, F., 1935. “Zur Kenntnis der Cladoceren-Gattung Anchistropus”, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 15, 289–330.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1936. “On a Remarkable Cladoceran”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 17, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1922. “On the Labral Glands of a Cladoceran (Simocephalus vetulus), with a Description of its Mode of Feeding”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 66, 213–234.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1924. “On the Development of an Estherid Crustacean”, Phil. Trans. B, 212, 395–430.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1928. “On the Feeding Mechanism of the Fairy Shrimp, Chirocephalus diaphanus Prevost”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 55, 807–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1933. “On the Feeding Mechanism of the Branchiopoda”, Phil. Trans. B, 222, 267–352.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1935 a. “A further Account of the Feeding Mechanism of Chirocephalus diaphanus”, Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 117, 455–470.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1935 b. “Function of the Labral Glands in Chirocephalus”, Nature, Lond., 136, 758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., and Leak, F. M. C., 1933. “On the Mouthparts of the Branchiopoda.” Appendix in Cannon, 1933, Phil. Trans. B, 222, 340–352.Google Scholar
Dornesco, G. T., and Steopoe, J., 1958. “Les glandes tégumentaires des phyllopodes anostracés”, Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., 20, 29–69.Google Scholar
Eriksson, S., 1934. “Studien über die Fangapparate der Branchiopoden nebst einigen phylogenetischen Bemerkungen”, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, 15, 23–287.Google Scholar
Franke, H., 1925. “Der Fangapparat von Chydorus sphœricus”, Z. Wiss. Zool., 125, 271–298.Google Scholar
Fryer, G., 1957. “The Food of some Freshwater Cyclopoid Copepods and its Ecological Significance”, J. Anim. Ecol., 26, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, G., 1960. “The Feeding Mechanism of Some Atyid Prawns of the Genus Caridina”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 64, 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, G., 1962. “Secretions of the Labral and Trunk Limb Glands in the Cladoceran Eurycercus lamellatus (O. F. Müller)”, Nature, Lond., 195, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grobben, C., 1879. “Die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Moina rectirostris. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Anatomie der Phyllopoden”, Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, 2, 203–268.Google Scholar
Harnisch, O., 1949. “Vergleichende Beobachtungen zum Nahrungserwerb von Daphnia und Ceriodaphnia”, Zool. Jb., 78, 173–192.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. S., 1951. A Study of the Physiology and Ecology of Certain Cladocera. Ph.D. Thesis. London University.Google Scholar
Lilljeborg, W., 1900. “Cladocera Sueciæ, oder Beitrage zur Kenntniss der in Schweden lebenden Krebsthiere von der Ordnung der Branchiopoden und der Unterordnung der Cladocera”, Nova Acta Soc. Sci. Upsal., 19, 1–701.Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. H., 1936. “On the Feeding Mechanism of a Ctenopod Cladoceran, Penilia avirostris Dana.”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1936, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, A. G., 1933. “The Feeding Mechanism of Chirocephalus diaphanus Prevost, the Fairy Shrimp”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1933, 1093–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundblad, O., 1920. “Vergleichende studien über die Nahrungsaufnahme einiger schwedischer Phyllopoden, nebst synonymischen, morphologisehen und biologischen Bemerkungen”, Ark. Zool., 13, 1–114.Google Scholar
Mahoon, M. S., 1960. “Functional Morphology of the Mandible in Crustacea. Part I. Branchiopoda”, Biologia, 6, 195–222.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1954. “The Evolution of Arthropodan Locomotory Mechanisms. Part 4. The Structure, Habits and Evolution of the Diplopoda”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool), 42, 299–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1961. “The Evolution of Arthropodan Locomotory Mechanisms. Part 7. Functional Requirements of Body Design in Colobognatha (Diplopoda) together with a Comparative Account of Diplopod Burrowing Techniques, Trunk Musculature and Segmentation”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 44, 383–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1963. “The Evolution of Mandibular Mechanisms in Arthropods”, Phil. Trans. B. In the press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, K. W., and Yonge, C. M., 1935. “Function of the Labral Glands in Chirocephalus”, Nature, Lond., 136, 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocioszynska-Bankierowa, J., 1933. “Über den Bau der Mandibeln bei Daphnia magna Straus”, Ann. Mus. Zool. Polon., 10, 33–40.Google Scholar
Scourfield, D. J., 1896. “The Olfactory Setæ of the Cladocera”, J. Quekett Micr. Cl., 6, 280–288.Google Scholar
Scourfield, D. J., 1905. “Die sogenannten ‘Riechstäbchen’ der Cladocera”, ForschBer. Biol. Sta. Plön, 12, 340–353.Google Scholar
Seifert, R., 1930. “Sinnesphysiologische Untersuchungen am Kiemenfuss (Triops cancriformis Bosc.)”, Z. Vergl. Physiol., 11, 386–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnov, N. N., 1962. “Eurycercus lamellatus (O. F. Müller) (Chydoridæ, Cladocera): field observations and nutrition”, Hydrobiologia, 20, 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyly, W. J. P., 1957. “Distribution and Seasonal Abundance of Entomostraca in Moorland Ponds near Windermere”, Hydrobiologia, 11, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1950. “Alcian blue 8 GS: a new stain for mucin”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 91, 477–479.Google Scholar
Storch, O., 1924. “Morphologie und Physiologie des Fangapparates der Daphniden. Nebst vergleichenden Betrachtungen über den Fangapparat der Cladoceren und Euphyllopoden”, Ergebn. Zool., 6, 125–234.Google Scholar
Storch, O., 1924–1925. “Der Phyllopoden-Fangapparat”, Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 12, 369–391; 13, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, O., 1925. “Cladocera”, Biol. Tiere Dtschl., 15, Pt. 14, 23–102.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1938. “The Nature and Significance of the Membranes surrounding the Developing Eggs of Homarus vulgaris and other Decapoda”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 107A, 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar