Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:47:29.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XII.—On the Structure of Samaropsis scotica Calder (emended) and Eurystoma angulare gen. et sp. nov., Petrified Seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

Albert G. Long
Albert G. Long*
Affiliation:
Berwickshire High School, Duns*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The Lower Carboniferous seed Samaropsis scotica Calder has been re-investigated from new material and assigned to a new genus Lyrasperma. It is shown to have a nucellar apex with a pollen chamber and a funnel-like structure interpreted as an expanded salpinx. The free parts of the two integumental lobes diverge as apical horns; there is therefore no micropyle. Eurystoma angulare gen. et sp. nov. possesses a similar nucellar apex but is usually quadrangular in section and has four apical lobes. The new genera are placed in the group Lagenostomales although the expanded salpinx is a character new to that group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 64 , Issue 12: 1959-1960 On the Structure of “Samaropsis Scotica” Calder (Emended) and “Eurystoma Angulare” Gen. ET SP. Nov., Petrified Seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire , 1960 , pp. 261 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

BarnarD, P. D. W., 1959. “On Eosperma oxroadense gen. et sp. nov.: a New Lower Carboniferous Seed from East Lothian”, Ann. Bot., 23, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, M. G., 1938. “On some undescribed Species from the Lower Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire; together with a note on the genus Stenomyelon Kidson”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 59, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, C. T., and others. “The Geology of East Lothian including parts of the Counties of Edinburgh and Berwick”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., 51, 60 and 89.Google Scholar
Göppert, H. R., 1864–1865. “Die Fossile Flora der Permischen Formation”, Palœontographica, 12, 177.Google Scholar
Joy, K. W., Willis, A. J., and Lacey, W. S., 1956. “A Rapid Cellulose Peel Technique in Palæobotany”, Ann. Bot., 20, 635–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., 1893. “On some New Species of Fossil Plants from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Scotland”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 12, 258–268. Pl. IV–VI.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1901. “Notes on Carboniferous Plants from Berwickshire”, Summ. Progr. Geol. Surv., 1900, 174–175.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1902a. “Report on Fossil Plants from the Calciferous Sandstones of the Berwickshire Border”, Summ. Progr. Geol. Surv., 1901, 179–180.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1902b. “The Flora of the Carboniferous Period; Pt. II” , Proc. Yorks. Geol. (Poly.) Soc., 14, 344–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidston, R., 1923-1925. “Fossil Plants of the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., 2, 168 and PL XXXIX, fig. 5.Google Scholar
Lesquereux, L., 1880-1884. “Description of the Coal Flora of the Carboniferous formation in Pennsylvania and throughout the United States”, Pa. Geol. Surv. Rep., P, PI. LXXXV, fig. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, F. E., 1951. “Small Petrified Seeds from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois”, Bot. Gaz., 113, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, F. W., and Salisbury, E. J., 1911. “On the Structure and Affinities of the Palæozoic Seeds of the Conostoma group”, Ann. Bot., 25, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, C. B., 1936. “The Flora of the New Albany Shale, Pt. 2, The Calamopityeae and their Relationships, Shorter Contributions to General Geology”, Prof. Pap., U.S. Geol. Surv., 186E, 81–104.Google Scholar
Smith, D. L., 1959. “ Geminitheca scotica gen. et sp. nov.: a Pteridosperm from the Lower Carboniferous of Dunbartonshire”, Ann. Bot., 23, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1917. Fossil Plants. Vol. III. Cambridge, pp. 166–177; 308 and 333.Google Scholar
Walton, J., 1949a. “A Petrified example of Alcicornopteris (A. Hallei sp. nov.) from the Lower Carboniferous of Dunbartonshire”, Ann. Bot., 13, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, J., 1949b. “ Calathospermum scoticum—an Ovuliferous Fructification of Lower Carboniferous Age from Dunbartonshire”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar