Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T15:29:55.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V.—The Explosion-breccia Pipes near Kentallen, Scotland, and their geological setting*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

D. R. Bowes  and
A. E. Wright
D. R. Bowes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow
A. E. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Birmingham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

More than twenty igneous intrusions, of widely varying composition and mainly in explosion-breccia pipes, cut the Appin Quartzite, Appin Limestone, Appin Phyllites and Cuil Bay Slates of the Dalradian Series which show evidence of a long and complex structural history. Early phases of tectonics and metamorphism (garnet-amphibolite facies) were followed by the dominant deformation of the region, referred to as main phase. The major structure of the Cuil Bay Synform, together with a series of parasitic folds, were developed during this phase together with a strong, retrogressive, regional cleavage. Late phase deformation acting prior to the development of the pipes produced steeply plunging open folds and box folds, of brittle type. The superimposition of these structures on main phase parasitic antiforms, in banded sequences of competent and incompetent units, produced dome-shaped structures with pipe-shaped zones of intensely fractured and brecciated rock. Late phase deformation after igneous intrusion was associated with the Great Glen Fault. The structural elements which exercised the dominant controls on the location and form of the pipes were the main phase regional cleavage, the main phase parasitic antiforms, the late phase steeply plunging open folds and the axial planes of the late phase box folds and open folds.

A generalized sequence of events for a number of the pipes is: (1) explosive activity with shattering and brecciation, (2) emplacement of variable but generally hornblende-rich igneous types, representing crystallization at high to moderate gas pressure, (3) the emplacement of augite diorites or kentallenites representing crystallization at low gas pressure and (4) the emplacement of generally small bodies of leucodiorite–granodiorite, possibly representing secondary hybrid liquids. The other pipes show one or more of these events and the sequence is that expected in volcanic activity associated with the build up and release of pressure on the breaching of structural traps (formed by the Appin Quartzite). Explosive activity took place on the sudden release of gas when the gas-charged basic magma moved into the dome-shaped interference structures with their pipe-shaped zones of much fractured and brecciated rock.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 67 , Issue 5 , 1967 , pp. 109 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bailey, E. B., and Maufe, H. B., 1960. “The geology of Ben Nevis, Glen Coe and the surrounding country”: (Expl. Sheet 53) Second edition revised by E. B. Bailey, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., 1962 a. “A possible eastern extension of the Ballachulish Granite”, Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasg., 24, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowes, D. R., 1962 b. “Kentallenite–lamprophyre–granite age relations at Kentallen, Argyll”, Geol. Mag., 99, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowes, D. R., and Bhattacharjee, C. C., 1967. “The metamorphic and migmatitic history of the Lewisian rocks north-west of Loch Tollie, Ross-shire, Scotland”, Krystalinikum, 5. [In the press].Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., Ghaly, T. S., and Wright, A. E., 1965. “Appinites in the Caledonides”, Geol. Mag., 102, 180–181.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., Kinloch, E. D., and Wright, A. E., 1964. “Rhythmic amphibole overgrowths in appinites associated with explosion-breccias in Argyll”, Miner. Mag., 33, 963–973.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., Macdonald, A. S., Matheson, G. D., and Wright, A. E., 1963. “An explosion-breccia–appinite complex at Glean Chàrnan, Argyll”, Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasg., 25, 19–30.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., and Wright, A. E., 1961. “An explosion-breccia complex at Back Settlement, near Kentallen, Argyll”, Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc., 18, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowes, D. R., and Wright, A. E., 1962. “Washout structures in the Dalradian near Kentallen, Argyll”, Geol. Mag., 99, 53–56.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., and Wright, A. E., 1965. “A comparison of the breccia-metagabbro–syenite complex at Fjone, South Central Norway, with some explosion-breccia–appinite complexes in the Caledonian orogenic belt of Scotland”, Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 45, 463–472.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R., and Wright, A. E., in press. “Early phases of Caledonian tectonics and metamorphism in the Ballachulish Slates”.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. F., 1965. “Nature and origin of kink-bands”, Tectonophysics, 1, 459–494.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L., and Tilley, C. E., 1930. “Metamorphism in relation to structure in the Scottish Highlands”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 56, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskola, P., 1956. “Postmagmatic potash metasomatism of granite”, Bull. Commn Géol. Finl., 29, 85–100.Google Scholar
French, W. J., and Pitcher, W. S., 1959. “The intrusion-breccia of Dunmore, Co. Donegal”, Geol. Mag., 96, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, P. F., and House, M. R., 1964. “The Devonian period”. In Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B. “The Phanerozoic Time-scale”, Q. Jl Geol. Soc. London., 120 S, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. B., and Kynaston, H., 1900. “On Kentallenite and its relation to other igneous rocks in Argyllshire”, Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond., 56, 531–557.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q., 1946. “The Great Glen Fault”, Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond., 102, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, J. L., 1961. “Joint-drags in Mid-Argyllshire”, Proc. Geol. Assoc., 72, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lensen, G. J., 1958. “Rationalized fault interpretation”, N.Z. Jl Geol. Geophys., 1, 307–317.Google Scholar
Miller, J. A., and Brown, P. E., 1965. “Potassium–argon age studies in Scotland”, Geol. Mag., 102, 106–134.Google Scholar
Orville, P. M., 1959. “Feldspars”, Yb. Carnegie Instn Wash., 58, 118–121.Google Scholar
Pitcher, W. S., and Read, H. H., 1952. “An appinitic intrusion-breccia at Kilkenny, Maas, Co. Donegal”, Geol. Mag., 89, 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. G., 1962. “Interference patterns produced by super-position of folds of similar type”, J. Geol., 70, 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, D. L., 1936. “Demonstrations in petrogenesis from Kiloran Bay, Colonsay. I: The transfusion of quartzite”, Miner. Mag., 24, 367–407.Google Scholar
Taubeneck, W. H., and Poldervaart, A., 1960. “Geology of Elkhorn Mountains, Northeastern Oregon: Part 2. Willow Lake Intrusion”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 71, 1295–1322.Google Scholar
Walker, F., 1927. “The igneous geology of Ardsheal Hill, Argyllshire”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 55, 147–157.Google Scholar
Wright, A. E., and Bowes, D. R., 1963. “Classification of volcanic breccias: A discussion”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 74, 79–86.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S. Jr., 1965. “Diopside-anorthite-water at five and ten kilobars and its bearing on explosive volcanism”, Yb. Carnegie Instn Wash., 64, 82–89.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S. Jr., and Tilley, C. E., 1962. “Origin of basalt magmas: an experimental study of natural and synthetic rock systems”, J. Petrology, 3, 342–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar