Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:21:29.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—Studies on the Soils developed on Basic Igneous Rocks in Central Aberdeenshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Robert Glentworth
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research.

Extract

Soils developed on basic igneous rocks, or their associated glacial drifts, are of fairly common occurrence in North-East Scotland and occupy a considerable area in Aberdeenshire. So far, only isolated studies with some specific object in view have been made of such soils, and a few descriptions with analyses have been published (Mitchell, 1936; Muir and Fraser, 1940; Whelan, 1939; Ogg, 1935). Interesting and important facts have been brought out in these investigations, but, apart from the work of Muir, no attempt has been made to study the distribution and field relations of the soils, and arable soils are mentioned only incidentally by Muir. In the present study an account is given of the classification and distribution of the various soil types occurring in the Kennethmont, Insch, Old Meldrum district of Aberdeenshire, an area which is highly farmed and which has long had a high reputation for its fertility and productivity. A soil map is given at the end of this study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Anderson, M. S., and Mattson, S., 1926. U.S. Deft. Agric, Bull. 1452.Google Scholar
Davies, W. M., 1925. Paper 21. Memorandum on Soil Survey in the West Midland Area.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. H., 1932. “A Field Classification of Soils for Use in the Soil Survey,” Sci. Agric., XII, 338.Google Scholar
Fraser, G. K., 1940. “Vegetation Survey of Waste Land,” Forestry, XIV, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, J., and Newlands, G., 1923. “The Value of Mineralogical Examination in Determining Soil Types,” Journ. Agric. Sci., XIII, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, H., and Smith, G. D., 1935. “Colloidal Chemical Aspects of Clay Pan Formation in Soil Profiles,” Soil Sci., XXXIX, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, J. S., 1935. “Soil Profile Studies, VII,” Soil Sci., XXXIX, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, G. S., 1811. A General View of the Agriculture of Aberdeenshire.Google Scholar
Kellogg, C. E., 1937. Soil Survey Manual, U.S. Deft. Agric, Misc. Pub. No. 274, 87.Google Scholar
Mattson, S., 1927. “Anionic and Cationic Adsorption by Soil Colloidal Materials of Varying SiO2/Al2Os + Fe3O3 Ratio,” Proc I Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Com. II, 199.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. L., 1936. “The Base Status of Scottish Soils, I,” Journ. Agric Sci., XXVI, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. L., and Muir, A., 1937. “Base Exchange Capacity and Clay Content of Soils,” Nature, CXXXIX, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, A., 1935. “Soils of the Teindland State Forest,” Forestry, VIII, 25.Google Scholar
Muir, A., and Fraser, G. K., 1940. “The Soils and Vegetation of the Bin and Clashindarroch Forests,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., LX, part 1, 223.Google Scholar
Ogg, W. G., 1935. “The Soils of Scotland,” Pt. 2, Emp. Journ. Exp. Agric., III, 248.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1923. Mem. Geol. Surv. Scot., Explanation of Sheets 86 and 96.Google Scholar
Rodé, A. A., 1937. Podzolization Process, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. B., 1941. Macaulay Institute, Ann. Rep., 19401941.Google Scholar
Troup, A. G., 1683. “An Account of the Northside of the Coast of Buchan.” Macfarlane's Geographical Collections, Scot. Hist. Soc., 1907, II, 140.Google Scholar
Wiegner, G., and Pallmann, H., 1929. “Hydrogen- and Hydroxyl-ion Swarms on Suspended Particles,” Proc. II Com. Int. Soc. Soil Sci., B, 92.Google Scholar
Whelan, L. A., 1939. “The Base Status of Scottish Soils, II,” Journ. Agric Sci., XXIX, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar