Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:30:04.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—Metamorphic Correlation in the Polymetamorphic Rocks of the Valla Field Block, Unst, Shetland Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

H. H. Read
H. H. Read
Affiliation:
George Herdman Professor of Geology in the University of Liverpool.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In my account (Read, 1935) of the metamorphic geology of Unst, in the Shetlands, I have shown that the island is made up of a series of tectonic units separated from one another by dislocations of various kinds. The rocks of most of the units have lengthy metamorphic histories that are different in the different units.

This present communication deals with one tectonic unit, the Valla Field Block. The metamorphic history of this block can be divided into three stages, each characterized by the type of pressure-temperature factors operative during it. It is my main purpose here first to give the evidence, derived from the study of the pelitic rocks, on which this subdivision is based, and then to examine the behaviour of the various other rock-types during the three episodes. The results show that the stability of certain minerals depends upon the bulk-composition of the rocks containing them. In polymetamorphism of the Unst type, the minerals cannot be considered apart from the rocks in which they occur—a point of importance for Highland geology in general.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1937 , pp. 195 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Becke, P., 1913. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. lxxv, pp. 134–140.Google Scholar
Geological Survey, 1931. Chemical Analyses of Igneous Rocks, Metamorphic Rocks and Minerals.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. M., 1920. “Die Injektionsmetamorphose im Stavangergebiet,” Skr. VidenskSelsk. Christ., no. 10, pp. 80–81.Google Scholar
Griggs, D. T., 1936. “Deformation of Rocks under High Confining Pressures,” Joum. Geol., vol. xliv, p. 567, and pi. v, cGoogle Scholar
Niggli, P., 1929. “Die chemisch-mineralogische Charakteristik der metamorphen Paragesteinsprovinz am Sudrande des Gotthardmassivs,” Schweiz. min. petrogr. Miti., vol. ix, pp. 160–187.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1927. “The Igneous and Metamorphic History of Cromar, Deeside, Aberdeenshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lv, pp. 317–353.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1931. “The Geology of Central Sutherland,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland. Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1935. “The Metamorphic Geology of Unst in the Shetland Islands,” Quart. Joum. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xc, pp. 637–688.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1916. “On Synantectic Minerals,” Bull. Com. Géol. Finlande, no. 48, pp. 127–129.Google Scholar
Suzuki, J., 1930. “Uber die Staurolith-Andalusit-Paragenesis im Glimmergneis von Piodina bei Brissago (Tessin),” Schweiz. min. petrogr. Mitt., vol. x, pp. 117–132.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E., 1921. “The Granite-Gneisses of Southern Eyre Peninsula (South Australia) and their Associated Amphibolites,” Quart. Joum. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. lxxvii, pp. 88, 97–98.Google Scholar