Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:59:07.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VII.—Nuclear Osmosis as a Factor in Mitosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. Anstruther Lawson
A. Anstruther Lawson
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent important work of Farmer and Digby (1910) on the cytology of certain varietal and hybrid ferns has raised again the interesting and absorbing question of the mechanism of mitosis. This paper constitutes a valuable addition to the literature which has bulked so largely during the last few years, and which has been instrumental in establishing many interesting and important facts regarding the greatest of all cytological problems—namely, nuclear division. The interest of this later contribution lies, not so much in the actual observations which these writers have jointly recorded—although the facts revealed are important in that they confirm the work of other writers and extend the range of observation,—but rather in the theory which they have deduced from their results and which they have put forward to account for the factors at work in the living cell,—factors which they believe to be concerned in the formation of the achromatic spindle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , 1912 , pp. 137 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, C. E., 1903, “The Early Stages in Spindle-Formation in the Pollen Mother-cells of Larix.” Ann. Bot., vol. xvii. p. 281, 1903.Google Scholar
Allen, C. E., 1905, “Nuclear Division in the Pollen Mother-cells of Lilium Canadense.” Ann. Bot., vol. xix. p. 189, 1905.Google Scholar
Allen, C. E., 1905, “Das Verhalten der Kernsubstanzen der Synapsis in den Pollenmutterzellen von Lilium Canadense.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 72, 1905.Google Scholar
Belajeff, W., 1894, “Zur Kenntniss der Karyokinese den Pflanzen.” Flora, lxxix., p. 430, 1894.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1904, “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 43, 1904.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1905, “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 141, 1905.Google Scholar
Berghs, J., 1905, “Le fuseau hétérotypique de Paris quadrafolia.” La Cellule, xxii. p. 203, 1905.Google Scholar
Byxbee, E. S., 1900, “The Development of the Karyokinetic Spindle in Lavatera.” Proc. Cal. Acad., iii., Bot. ii. p. 63, 1900.Google Scholar
Cardiff, J. D., 1906, “A Study of Synapsis and Reduction.” Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, xxxiii. p. 271, 1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1899, “The Spore Mother-cells of Anthoceros.” Bot. Gaz.Google Scholar
Davis, B. M., 1909, “Pollen Development of Œnothera grandiflora.” Ann. Bot., xxiii. p. 551, 1909.Google Scholar
Davis, B. M., “The Reduction Division of Œnothera biennis.” Ann. Bot., xxiv. p. 631, 1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debski, B., 1897, “Beobachtungen über Kerntheilung bei Chara fragilis.” Juhrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 227, 1897.Google Scholar
Dixon, H. H., 1901, “On the First Mitosis of the Spore Mother-cells of Lilium.” Notes Bot. Sch. Trin. Coll. Dublin, 1901.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., 1893, “On Nuclear Division in the Pollen Mother-cells of Lilium martagon.” Ann. Bot., vii. p. 392, 1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, J. B., 1895, “Ueber Kerntheilung in Lilium Antheren, besonders in Bezug auf die Centrosomenfrage.” Flora, lxxx. p. 56, 1895.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Moore, , 1905, “On the Maiotic Phase in Animals and Plants.” Quar. Jour. Micro. Soc., xlviii. p. 489, 1905.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Digby, L., 1910, “On the Cytological Features exhibited by certain Varietal and Hybrid Ferns.” Ann. Bot. xxiv., p. 191, 1910.Google Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1909, “The Behaviour of Chromosome in Œnothera lata × O. gigas.” Bot. Gaz., xlviii. p. 179, 1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, R. R., 1908, “A Study of Reduction in Œnothera rubrinervis.” Bot. Gaz., xliii. p. 1, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, U., Wygaerts, et, 1903, “La reconstitution du noyau et la formation des chromosomes dans les cinìses somatiques.” La Cellule, t. xxi., 1903.Google Scholar
Hartog, M., 1905, “The Dual Force of the Dividing Cell.” Pt. I. The achromatic spindle figure illustrated by magnetic chains of force, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., lxxvi. p. 548, 1905.Google Scholar
Juel, O., 1897, “Die kerntheilungen in den Pollenmutterzellen von Hemeroeallis fulva, und die bei denselben auftreten den Unregelmässigkeiten.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 205, 1897.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1900, “Origin of the Cones of the Multipolar Spindle in Gladiolus.” Bot. Gaz., xxx. p. 145, 1900.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1903, “On the Relationship of the Nuclear Membrane to the Protoplast.” Bot. Gaz., xxxv. p. 305, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1903, “Studies in Spindle Formation.” Bot. Gaz., xxxvi. p. 81, 1903.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. A., 1911, “The Phase of the Nucleus known as Synapsis.” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvii., pt. iii. p. 591, 1911.Google Scholar
Miyake, K., 1905, “Ueber Reduktionsteilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einigen Monokotylen.” Jahrb. Wiss Bot., xlii. p. 83, 1905.Google Scholar
Moore, A. C., 1903, “The Mitosis in the Spore Mother-cell of Pallavicinia.” Bot. Gaz., xxxvi. p. 384, 1903.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1898, “Ueber das Verhalten der Kerne der Entwickelung des Embryosacks und die Vorgänge bei der Befruchtung.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxxi. p. 125, 1898.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1897, “Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Kerntheilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einiger Monokotylen und Dikotylen.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 169, 1897.Google Scholar
Mottier, D. M., 1907, “The Development of the Heterotypic Chromosomes in Pollen Mother-cells.” Ann. Bot., xxi. p. 309, 1907.Google Scholar
Němec, B., 1899, “Ueber die karyokinetische Kerntheilung in der Wurzelspitze von Allium cepa.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxxiii. p. 313, 1899.Google Scholar
Osterhout, W. J. V., 1897, “Ueber Entstehung der karyokinetischen Spindel bei Equisetum.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xxx. p. 159, 1897.Google Scholar
Osterhout, W. J. V., 1902, “Spindle Formation in Agave.” Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., iii., Bot. ii. p. 255, 1902.Google Scholar
Overton, J. B., 1909, “On the Organisation of the Nuclei in the Pollen Mother-cells of Certain Plants.” Ann. Bot., xxiii., 1909.Google Scholar
Peirce, G. J., Plant Physiology. New York, 1903.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1890, Zur Kenntniss der Plasmahaut und der Vacuolen, etc. Leipzig, 1890.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1897, Pflanzenphysiologie. Leipzig, 1897.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, W., 1900, Physiology of Plants. Translated by Ewart, , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1900.Google Scholar
Sargant, E., 1897, “The Formation of the Sexual Nuclei in Lilium Martagon.” Ann. Bot., xi., 1, 1897.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W., 1900, “The Achromatic Spindle in the Spore Mother-cells of Osmunda regalis.” Bot. Gaz., xxx. p. 361, 1900.Google Scholar
Stomps, T. J., 1910, Kerndeeling en Synapsis bij Spinacia Oleracea. Amsterdam, 1910.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1882, “Ueber den Teilungsvorgang der Zellkerne und das Verhältniss der Kerntheilung zur Zelltheilung.” Arch. Mikr. Anat., xxi. p. 476, 1882.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1900, “Ueber Reduktionsteilung, Spindelbildung, Centrosomen und Cilienbilder im Pflanzenreich,” Hist. Beitr., vi. p. 224, 1900.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1905, “Typische und allotypische Kernteilung.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xlii. p. 1, 1905.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E., 1907, “Ueber die Individuleitat der chromosomen und die Pfropfhybriden-Frage.” Jahrb. Wiss. Bot., xliv. p. 482, 1907.Google Scholar
Williams, C. L., 1899, “The Origin of the Karyokinetic Spindle in Passiflora cœrulea.” Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., iii., Bot. i. p. 189, 1899.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1906, “The Life History of Polysiphonia.” Bot. Gaz., xlii. p. 401, 1906.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1908, “Sporogenesis in Nephrodium.” Bot. Gaz., xlv. p. 1, 1908.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, S., 1910, “Chromosomes in Osmunda.” Bot. Gaz., xlix. p. 1, 1910.Google Scholar