^{page 61 note *} Races of India. Journ. Ethno. Soc., London. N.S. Vol. I. p. 130, 1869Google Scholar.

^{page 61 note †} See also Chanda Settlement Report; Colonel Glasfurd's Report on Bastár; Mr Robertson's Census Report, 1891.

^{page 78 note *} For the meaning of this and several other descriptive terms used to denote proportion between certain diameters of the skeleton, see my Report on Human Skeletons, in Challenger Reports, Part XLVII., 1886.

^{page 89 note *} Mr Robertson, in his Report on the Census in the Central Provinces, p. 190, states that in Raipur a tribe of people named Kámár live in remote jungles on fruits and small game, and although in some provinces, as Bengal, the term is an occupational one, it includes both aborigines and non-aboriginal people.

^{page 94 note *} Trans. Roy. Soc., Edinburgh, 1899, vol. xxxix. p. 712Google Scholar.

^{page 99 note *} Taylor, Meadows in Journ. Ethno. Soc., London, N.S., vol. i. p. 175, 1869Google Scholar.

^{page 99 note †} Geological Magazine, vol. xi. p. 503.

^{page 99 note ‡} Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed., p. 651, London, 1897Google Scholar.

^{page 99 note §} Journ. Anthro. Inst., 1899, vol. ii. p. 141Google Scholar.

^{page 100 note *} Journal Asiatic Soc. Bengal, vol. lvii. part xi., 1888Google Scholar.

^{page 100 note †} Journ. of Anthropo. Soc., p. cxxxvi. in Anthropological Review, vol. iii., 1865Google Scholar.

^{page 100 note ‡} Walhouse, M. J. has described, Journ. Anth. Inst., 1875, vol. iv. p. 369Google Scholar, a leaf wearing tribe, named Korăgar, in South Canara, on the western coast of India. The leaves are worn by the women, a survival, apparently of a habit prior to the use of raiment, but outside the clothes. The people are black skinned, thick lipped, nose broad and flat hair rough and bushy. The men, he says, seldom exceed in stature 5 feet 6 inches, but this is probably too high an estimate of their stature.

^{page 101 note *} Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxix., 1899Google Scholar.

^{page 101 note †} Sir W. W. Hunter's Indian Empire and Thurston's Madras Bulletin, 1899, p. 195.

^{page 101 note ‡} Calcutta, 1847.

^{page 101 note §} The Tribes and Castes of Bengal, 1891.

^{page 102 note *} I have not included in this number the two Bhima skulls, which possibly may be a sub-division of the Gonds, with which, in their form and proportions, they indeed closely correspond. As there may be a doubt as to their racial position, I thought it advisable to exclude them.

^{page 102 note †} I have not included in this number I.M. No. 407 (Table IV.), which is deformed from scaphocephalus nor I.M. No. 604, Jattia Múnda.

^{page 102 note ‡} I have discussed the relations of mesaticephalic skulls to dolichocephalic and brachycephalic crania in Part I. of this Memoir in Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. xxxix. part iii. p. 744.

^{page 104 note *} It is not unlikely that in the living person the nose may have, on account of the lateral extension of the alæ, a more strongly marked platyrhine character than would be obtainable from the width of the anterior nares in the skull itself.

^{page 105 note *} I may refer to my Challenger Report on Human Crania, part xxix., 1884, for an analysis of the characters of the skulls of the Australian aborigines.

^{page 107 note *} The crania marked Uriyá, Orissa, in the Tables, are those which had been obtained from the Medical College. It will be seen that specimens so marked occur in each of the three groups tabulated in VI., VII., VIII.

^{page 107 note †} Historical Relation of the Island of Ceylon. London, 1817Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note ‡} Account of the Interior of Ceylon and of its Inhabitants. London, 1821Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note §} Ceylon and its Dependencies. London, 1849Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note ∥} Ceylon. London, 1859Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note ¶} Fortnightly Review, London, 1876, vol. xixGoogle Scholar.

^{page 107 note **} Trans. Ethnol. Soc., London, 1863Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note ††} Overland Times of Ceylon, Nov. 6th, 1886.

^{page 108 note *} Proc. Linn. Soc., 1862, vol. viGoogle Scholar.

^{page 108 note †} Thesaurus Craniorum, 1867.

^{page 108 note ‡} Scientific Papers and Addresses, vol. i., Oxford, 1884, edited by Turner, W.Google Scholar.

^{page 108 note §} “Ueber die Weddas von Ceylon,” Abh. der K. Akad. der Wiss. zu Berlin, 1881.

^{page 108 note ∥} Journ. Anth. Inst., Nov. 1889.

^{page 108 note ¶} Ergebuisse naturwissenschaftlicher Furschungen auf Ceylon, 3d Band, die Weddas von Ceylon. Wiesbaden, 1892–1893Google Scholar.

^{page 112 note *} I have described my method in Challenger Reports, part xxix. p. 15, 1884. By the method of Broca, followed by so many craniologists, the capacity is overstated.

^{page 114 note *} Dresden, 1899.

^{page 114 note †} The People of India, 10 vols., 1868, e. s. London. India MuseumGoogle Scholar.

^{page 114 note ‡} Madras Bulletin, vol. ii. No. 3, p. 187, 1899Google Scholar.

^{page 114 note §} Adventures in Andaman Islands. London, 1861Google Scholar.

^{page 114 note ∥} Journ. Anthrop. Inst., xiv., 1885Google Scholar.

^{page 114 note ¶} Les Pygmées, Paris, 1887Google Scholar; and in conjunction with M. Hamy, Crania Ethnica, p. 184.

^{page 114 note **} Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1880, p. 415.

^{page 115 note *} The bones of five of the skeletons, exclusive of the skulls, were described by me in the Challenger Report, Zoology, vol. xvi. part xlvii., 1886.

^{page 117 note *} Journ. Anthrop. Inst., Nov. 1879, vol. ix., and Nov. 1884Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note *} After this Memoir was in type I received, through the courtesy of Major Bannerman, M.D., the Madras Christian College Magazine for September and October 1900, in which is an article by Mr C. Hayavadawa Rau, B.A., on the origin of the Servile Classes and Hill Tribes of South India. In this article Mr Rau discusses, from the physical, social, linguistic and intellectual points of view, the Negrito theory of the origin of the Dravidians, and regards the theory as untenable. He draws the inference that all the indigenous tribes found by the Aryan immigrants in Southern India belonged substantially to one and the same Dravidian race.

^{page 118 note †} These accounts are abstracted in G. W. Earl's work on the Native Races of the Indian Archipelago, London, 1853.

^{page 118 note ‡} Verh. der Berliner Ges. für Anth., etc., 1876 and 1891, p. 837; Journ. of Straits Branch of Royal Asiatic Soc., 1878.

^{page 118 note §} Les Pygmées, Paris, 1887, pp. 54, 55Google Scholar.

^{page 118 note ∥} Journal of Auth. Institute, vol. xv. p. 285, 1886Google Scholar.

^{page 119 note *} Verh. der Berliner Ges. für Anth., etc., November 1891, July and October 1892.

^{page 119 note †} Mitteil. der Naturwiss. Ges. in ll'interthur, Heft ii., 1900.

^{page 120 note *} Journ. Anthrop. Inst., vol. xv. p. 299, 1886Google Scholar.

^{page 120 note †} Mr Nelson Annandale has kindly given me photographs which he took of a Sakai rock shelter in Patalung which resembles the hut described by Dr Scott.

^{page 122 note *} Challenger Report on Human Skeletons, part xlvii., 1886.

^{page 123 note *} For the use of this term see my Challenger Report on Human Skeletons, part xlvii., 1886.

^{page 123 note †} Address to section of Anthropology in British Association Reports, Toronto, 1897.

^{page 123 note ‡} Challenger Report, op. cit., page 97.

^{page 124 note *} Journal of Anat. and Phys., 1889–1894.

^{page 124 note †} I am indebted to Colonel Cadell, V.C., for the gift of this skeleton, which I have had articulated.