Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:14:54.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI—Caradocian Cystidea from Girvan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

F. A. Bather
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Scottish specimens described in this memoir are all the property of Mrs Robert Gray, and I am exceedingly indebted to her, not only for entrusting them to me for description, but for allowing them to remain in my hands for a lengthy period. None of the collections of the Geological Survey, nor those of Glasgow University, contain any cystids from Girvan. Besides her Cystidea, Mrs Gray has submitted to me her Crinoidea and several interesting specimens of Edrioasteroidea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , 1913 , pp. 359 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Papers and Works Referred to

Allen, Henry A.—1902. “Catalogue of Types and figured specimens of British Palaeozoic Echinodermata preserved in the Museum of Practical Geology, London.” Geol. Surv. U.K., Summ. Progr., 1901, pp. 204–211.Google Scholar
Ami, Henry M.—Dec. 1887. “Synopsis of the Geology of Montreal.” Brit. Med. Assoc. Official Guide, Montreal, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
Ami, Henry M.—Jan. 1905. “Preliminary lists of fossil organic remain's from the Potsdam, Beekmantown (Calciferous), Chazy, Black River, Trenton, Utica, and Pleistocene Formations comprised within the Perth Sheet (No. 119) in Eastern Ontario.” Rep. Geol. Surv. Ganada, vol. 14, pp. 80 J–89 J.Google Scholar
Angelin, Nils Peter—1878. Iconographia Crinoideorum in Stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium…. 4to. iv & 62 pp., 2 pp. Index, 29 pls. Holmiae. Cystidea edidit S. Loven, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
Baily, William Hellier—1878. Palaeontological notes to Explanatory Memoir to Sheet 34, Geological Survey of Ireland, by J. Nolan.Google Scholar
Barrande, Joachim—1867. Systême Silurien du Centre de la Bohême. Ière Partie: Recherches Paléontologiques…. Vol. 3. Classe des Mollusques. Ordre des Ptéropodes. 4to. xvi & 180 pp., 16 pls. Prague.Google Scholar
Barrande, Joachim—Dec. 1887. Échinodermes. Études locales et comparatives. Extraits du Systême Silurien…. Vol. 7…. publié par … W. Waagen. 8vo. xxviii & 356 pp., pls. 1, 9, 26, and 30. Prague.Google Scholar
Barrande, Joachim—Dec. 1887. Systême Silurien du Centre dela Bohême. Ière Partie: Recherches Paléontologiques…. Vol. 7. Classe des Échinodermes. Ordre des Cystidées. Ouvrage posthume … publié par … W. Waagen. 4to. xx & 234 pp., 39 pls. Prague.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S.—Dec. 1911. “The Early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic Provinces.” Bull. U.S. National Mus., No. 77. xxii and 382 pp., 13 pls.Google Scholar
[Bather, F. A.]—July 18, 1889. “The Cystidea of Bohemia.” Nature, vol. 40, pp. 267–270. Review of J. Barrande, 1887.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A.—1896. “Stone-lilies, Starfishes, … Subkingdom Echinodermata.” Chapter viii, of vol. 6 of the Royal Natural History, pp. 289–319. London.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A.—Feb. 1899. “A Phylogenetic Classification of the Pelmatozoa.” Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1898, pp. 916–923.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A.—March 1900. A Treatise on Zoology, edited by Ray Lankester, E.. Part III., The Echinoderma. Chapters viii.–xii. 8vo. London.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A.—Dec. 1906. “Ordovician Cystidea from Burma.” In Reed, F. R. C., “The Lower Palaeozoic Fossils of the Northern Shan States, Burma.” Palaeont. Indica, n. ser., vol. 2, mem. 3, pp. 6–40, pls. 1, 2. 2 leaves, with omitted legends to figs, 1a, 1b, 2a-2m, were issued in Dec. 1908.Google Scholar
Bergeron, Jules—1889. “Étude géologique du massif ancien situé au sud du plateau central.” Ann. Sci. Géol., vol. 22, pp. i.–iv., 1–362, pls. 1–9, and map.Google Scholar
Bernard, Félix—1893. Éléments de Paléontologie. Première Partie. 8vo. 528 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah—April & May 1854. “On some new Genera and Species of Cystidea from the Trenton Limestone.” [First paper.] Canad. Journ., vol. 2, pp. 215–218, 250–253. Second paper June 1854, tom. cit., pp. 268–274.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah—March 1857. “Report for the Year 1856.” Geol. Surv. Canada, Rep. Progr. for 1853–54–55–56 Toronto, pp. 247–345.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah—June 1858. “On the Cystideae of the Lower Silurian Rocks of Canada.” Canadian Organic Remains dec. 3, pp. 9–74, pls. 1–7.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah—May 1859. “On the Crinoideae of the Lower Silurian Rocks of Canada.” Canadian Organic Remains, dec. 4, pp. v, vi, 7–66, pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Billings, Elkanah—Nov. 1866. Catalogues of the Silurian Fossils of the Island of Anticosti, with descriptions of some new genera and species. 8vo. 93 pp., Geol. Survey Canada, Montreal.Google Scholar
Billings, Walter E.—1881. “Notes on two Species and one Genus of Fossils from the Trenton Limestone, Ottawa.” Trans. Ottawa Field-Nat. Club, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 34, 35.Google Scholar
Broili, Ferdinand—See Zittel, K. A. von, 1910.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Philip Herbert—Oct. 1891. “On certain points in the morphology of the Cystidea.” Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Zool., vol. 24, pp. 1–52, p1. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C[hapman, E[dward] J.—July 1857. “Cystideans” [in Notes on “Geology and Mineralogy”]. Canad. Journ., n. ser., vol. 2 ( = vol. 7), pp. 302–304.Google Scholar
C[hapman, E[dward] J.—Jan. 1859. “[Review of] Figures and Descriptions of Canadian Organic Remains: Decade III.” Canad. Journ., n. ser., vol. 4, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
Delage, Yves, & Hérouard, Edgard—March 1904. Traité de Zoologie Concrète. Tome III. Les Échinodermes. 8vo. x & 496. pp., 53 pls. Paris [dated 1903].Google Scholar
Eastman, Charles R.—See Zittel, K. A. von, 1896.Google Scholar
Eichwald, Carl Eduard Von—1842. Die Urwelt Russlands … Zweites Heft. I. Neuer Beitrag zur Geognosie Esthlands und Finlands. 8vo. St. Petersburg. Advance copy, with added title-page and 6 pp. dedication, from Beitr. z. Kenntniss d. Russ. Reichs, vol. 8, pp. 1–138, pls. 1–3. 1843.Google Scholar
Eichwald, Carl Eduard Von—1856. “Beitrag zur geographischen Verbreitung der Fossilen Thiere Russlands. Alte Periode [Klasse der Radiaten].” Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou, vol. 29, pp. 114–127. Also issued as pp. 60–73 of the whole work. 8vo. 242 pp. Moskau, 1857.Google Scholar
Eichwald, Carl Eduard Von—1859. Lethaea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie … V. Livraison. Animaux fossiles de la Période Ancienne. 8vo. pp. 271–748. Atlas, pls. 22–50. Stuttgart. Angelin quotes this as 1860.Google Scholar
Elles, Gertrude L.—See Fearnsides, W. G., Elles, G. L., & Smith, B.Google Scholar
Etheridge, Robert [F.R.S.].—See Museum of Practical Geology.Google Scholar
Etheridge, Robert [fil.]—See Nicholson, H. A., & Etheridge, R.Google Scholar
Fearnsides, W. G., Elles, Gertrude L., & Smith, Bernard—July 16, 1907. “The Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Pomeroy.” Proc. R. Irish Acad., vol. 26, sect. B, No. 9, pp. 97–128, pls. 7, 8.Google Scholar
Gray, Elizabeth [Mrs Robert]—July 1899. Appendix No. 3 to Prach, B. N., & Horne, J. [q.v.].Google Scholar
Gurley, William F. E.—See Miller, S. A., & Gurley, W. F. E.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst H. P. A.—July 25, 1896. “Die cambrische Stammgruppe der Echinodermen.” Jena Zeitschr., vol. 30, pp. 393–404.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst H. P. A.—Oct. 1896. “Die Amphorideen und Cystoideen. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Echinodermen.” Festsclir. f. C. Oegenbaur, vol. 1, pp. 1–179, pls. 1–5. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hall, James—1859, 1861. Palaeontology (of New York): Vol. 3 … Lower Helderberg Group and the Oriskany Sandstone. Part 1: text, xii & 532 pp., errata (1859). Part 2: Atlas, pls. 1–120, 2 bis, 2A, 3A, 3B, 7A, 10A, 28A, 28B, 49a, 72A, 80A, 81a, 81B, 81C, 82A, 83*, 83a, 84A, 95A, 101A, 103A, 103B. (1861.)Google Scholar
Hérouard, Edgard—See Delage, Y., & Hérouard, E.Google Scholar
Hoernes, Rudolf—1884. Elemente der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). 8vo. xvi & 594 pp. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, John—See Peach, B. N., & Horne, J. Also Peach, B. N., Horne, J., & Macconochie, A.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry—See Museum of Practical Geology.Google Scholar
Hyatt, Alpheus—1881. “Transformations of Planorbis at Steinheim, with remarks on the effects of gravity upon the forms of shells and animals.” Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 527–550, pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Jaekel, Otto—Mar. 1897. “Ueber des Darmsystem der Pelmatozoen.” Sitz-Ber. Gesell, naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1897, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
Jaekel, Otto—Nov. 1899. Stammesgeschichte der Pelmatozoen. Erster Band. Thecoidea und Cystoidea. 4to. x & 442 pp. 18 pls. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jaekel, Otto—May 1901. “Ueber Carpoideen, eine neue Klasse von Pelmatozoen.” Zeitschr. deutsch, geol. Gesell., vol. 52, pp. 661–677.Google Scholar
Katzer, Friedrich—1889–1892. Geologie von Böhmen, u.s.w. 8vo. xxii & 1606 pp., 4 maps, 4 portr. Prag.Google Scholar
Katzer, Friedrich—1902. Geologie von Böhmen, u.s.w. 8vo. xxii & 1606 pp., 4 maps, 4 Zweite Auflage.Google Scholar
Kirk, Edwin—June 1911. “The Structure and Relationships of certain Eleutherozoic Pelmatazoa” [sic, err. typ.]. Proc. U.S. National Mus., vol. 41, pp. 1–137, pls. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamansky, Wladimir—1905. “Die aeltesten silurischen Schichten Russlands (Etage B).” Mém. Com. géol. Petersbourg, n. ser., livr. 20, viii & 203 pp., 2 pls.Google Scholar
Lapworth, Charles—Nov. 1882. “The Girvan Succession. Part I. Stratigraphy.” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 38, pp. 537–666, pls. 24, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovén, Sven—See Angelin, N. P.Google Scholar
Macconochie, A.—See Peach, B. N., Horne, J., & Macconochie, A.Google Scholar
Malaise, Constantin—Sept. 1900. “État actuel de nos connaissances sur le Silurien de Belgique.” Ann. Soc. géol. Belgique, vol. 25 bis., pp. 179–216.Google Scholar
Marr, John E.—Jan. 1887. “The Lower Palaeozoic Rocks near Settle.” Geol. Mag., dec. III., vol. 4, pp. 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, John E.—Mar. 1892. “The Coniston Limestone Series.” Geol. Mag., dec. III., vol. 9, pp. 97–110, pl. 3.Google Scholar
Marr, John E.—May 1905. “Address of the President.” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 61, pp. xlvii–lxxxvi.Google Scholar
Miller, Samuel A.—1889. North American Geology and Palaeontology. 8vo. 664 pp. Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Miller, Samuel A. & Gurley, William F. E.—April 1895. “Description of new species of Palaeozoic Echinodermata.” Bull. Illinois State Mm. Nat. Hist., No. 6, 62 pp., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Museum of Practical Geology—1878. A Catalogue of the Cambrian and Silurian Fossils in the Museum, etc. 8vo. iv & 144 pp. London. (“Drawn up by E. T. Newton … under superintendence” of T. H. Huxley. Specimens named by R. Etheridge.)Google Scholar
Neumayr, Melchior—1889. Die Stämme des Thierreiches. Wirbellose Thiere. 8vo. vi & 604 pp. Wien und Prag.Google Scholar
Newton, Edwin Tully—See Museum of Practical Geology.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Henry Alleyne, & Etheridge, Robert [fil.]—1880. “A Monograph of the Silurian Fossils of the Girvan District, etc.” Fase, iii., pp. 237–341, pls. 16—24. 8vo. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., & Horne, J.—July 1899. “The Silurian Rocks of Britain. Vol. 1.: Scotland.” xviii & 750 pp., 27 pls. and map. Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., & Horne, J. & Macconochie, A.—1901. “The Silurian Rocks in the South of Scotland,” in Fauna, Flora, and Geology of the Clyde Area, Brit. Assoc., Glasgow, pp. 423–444.Google Scholar
Raymond, Percy E.—1912. “Palaeontological Division. II. Invertebrate.” Summary Rep. Geol. Surv. for 1911. Ottawa. (Pp. 351–357. “Stratigraphy of the Ordovician Formations of the Ottawa Valley.”)Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. Cowper—Nov. 1899. “The Lower Palaeozoic bedded rocks of County Waterford.” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 55, pp. 718–772, pl. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, F. R. Cowper—Dec. 1906. “The Lower Palaeozoic Fossils of the Northern Shan States, Burma.” Palaeont. Indica, n. ser., vol. 2, Mem. 3, 154 pp., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. Cowper—Dec. 1903, 1904, 1906. “The Lower Palaeozoic Trilobites of the Girvan District, Ayrshire.” Palaeontogr. Soc.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Sidney H.—March 1894. “Certain Fossils from the Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Yorkshire.” Geol. Mag., dec. IV., vol. 1, pp. 108–111, pi. iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, John William—1866. “On the Fossils of North Wales.” Appendix to The Geology of North Wales, by A. C. Ramsay. Mem. Geol. Surv. Gt. Britain, vol. 3, pp. 237–381, pls. 1–11A, 11B–26.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Friedrich—1874. “Miscellanea Silurica II. Ueber einige neue und wenig bekannte Baltisch-Silurische Petrefacten.” Mém. Acad. Sci. Petersbourg, ser. 7, vol. 21, No. 11, iv & 48 pp., pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles—Oct. 1903. “On New Siluric Cystoidea, and a New Camarocrinus.” Amer. Geol., vol. 32, pp. 230–240.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles—Nov. 1904. “On Siluric and Devonic Cystidea and Camarocrinus.” Smithsonian Misceli. Collect., vol. 47, pp. 201–272, pls. 34–44.Google Scholar
Schuchert, Charles—Feb. 1910. “Paleogeography of North America.” Bull. Geol. Soc. America, vol. 20, pp. 427–606, pls. 46–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bernard—See Fearnsides, W. G., Elles, G. L., & Smith, B.Google Scholar
Springer, Frank—May 1911. “On a Trenton Echinoderm fauna at Kirkfield, Ontario.” Mem. No. 15–P, Canada Dept. Mines, Geol. Surv., 70 pp., 5 pls. (on numbered pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, Frank—See Wachsmuth, C, & Springer, F.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Edward Oscar—Aug. 1911. “Revision of the Paleozoic Systems.” Bull. Geol. Soc. America, vol. 22, pp. 281–680, pls. 25—29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachsmuth, Charles, & Springer, Frank—1881. “Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea: Part II.” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. for 1881, pp. 177–411, pls. 17–19.Google Scholar
Warburg, Elsa—Feb. 1910. “Geological description of Nittsjö and its environs in Dalarne.” Geol. Foren. Stockholm Förhandl., vol. 32, pp. 425–450, pl. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, Stuart—Dec. 1898. “The Silurian Fauna interpreted on the epicontinental basis.” Journ. Geol., vol. 6, pp. 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elvira—May 1909. “A critical summary of TROOST'S unpublished manuscript on the Crinoids of Tennessee.” Bull. U.S. National Mus., No. 64. xii & 150 pp., 15 pls.Google Scholar
Zittel, Karl A. Von—1879. Handbuch der Palaeontologie. Palaeozoologie. I. Band. I. Abtheilung. III. Stamm. Echinodermata. Pp. 308–560. München und Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zittel, Karl A. Von—1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). 8vo. viii & 972 pp. München und Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zittel, Karl A. Von—Dec. 1896. Text-book of Palaeontology. Translated and Edited by Eastman, C. R.. Vol. 1, part i., 352 pp. New York. Subsequently incorporated in the complete Vol. 1. 8vo. x & 706 pp. London and New York.Google Scholar
Zittel, Karl A. Von—1903. Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie). I Abteilung: Invertebrata. Zweite Auflage. 8vo. viii & 558 pp. München und Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, Karl A. Von—1910. Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie). I. Abteilung Invertebrata. Dritte Auflage, neubearbeitet von Ferdinand Broili. 8vo. x & 608 pp. München und Berlin.Google Scholar