Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:40:02.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress-forecasting: a viable alternative to earthquake prediction in a dynamic Earth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Stuart Crampin
Stuart Crampin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, U.K. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Self-organised criticality of the crust appears to make deterministic earthquake prediction of time, place and magnitude of individual large earthquakes inherently impossible. This closes one line of approach to mitigating earthquake hazards. This paper suggests that a viable alternative to earthquake prediction is monitoring the build-up of stress before a large earthquake can occur. A new understanding of rock deformation allows stress changes to be monitored with seismic shear-wave splitting (seismic birefringence). With a suitable monitoring installation, this would allow the stochastic proximity of impending earthquakes to be recognised so that earthquakes could be forecast in the sense of recognising that crustal deformation was preparing for a large earthquake. Such stress-forecasting is not prediction, but, in many circumstances, a possible forecast crescendo of increasing urgency is exactly what is needed to best mitigate hazard to life and property.

Keywords

anisotropic poro-elasticitycracksfracture criticalitymodelling deformationselforganised criticalityshear-wave splitting
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , 1998 , pp. 121 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, Y. P., Sykes, L. R., Simpson, D. W.Richards, P. G. 1975. Spatial and temporal variations in ts/tP and in the P-wave residuals at Blue Mountain Lake, New York: application to earthquake prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research 80, 71832.Google Scholar
Aster, R. C., Shearer, P. M.Berger, J. 1990. Quantitative measurements of shear-wave polarizations at the Anza seismic network, Southern California: implications for shear-wave splitting and earthquake prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 1244973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aster, R. C., Shearer, P. M.Berger, J. 1991. Reply. Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 641519.Google Scholar
Bak, P.Chen, K. 1991. Self-organized criticality. Scientific American 264, 1, 4653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, P.Tang, C. 1989. Earthquakes as self-organised critical phenomenon. Journal of Geophysical Research 94, 156357.Google Scholar
Booth, D. C.Crampin, S. 1985. Shear-wave polarizations on a curved wavefront at an isotropic free-surface. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 83, 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. C., Crampin, S., Lovell, J. H.Chiu, J.-M. 1990. Temporal changes in shear wave splitting during an earthquake swarm in Arkansas. Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 1115164.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1978. Seismic wave propagation through a cracked solid: polarization as a possible dilatancy diagnostic. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 53, 46796.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1989. Suggestions for a consistent terminology for seismic anisotropy. Geophysical Prospecting 37, 75370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S. 1990a. The potential of shear-wave VSPs for monitoring recovery: a letter to management. The Leading Edge 9, 3, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S. 1990b. Alignment of near-surface inclusions and appropriate crack geometries for geothermal hot-dry-rock experiments. Geophysical Prospecting 38, 62131.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1991. An alternative scenario for earthquake prediction experiments. Geophysical Journal International 107, 1859.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1993a. Arguments for EDA. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 29, 1830.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1993b. A review of the effects of crack geometry on wave propagation through aligned cracks. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 29, 317.Google Scholar
Crampin, S. 1994. The fracture criticality of crustal rocks. Geophysical Journal International 118, 42838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S.Booth, D. C. 1989. Shear-wave splitting showing hydraulic dilatation of pre-existing joints in granite. Scientific Drilling, 1, 216.Google Scholar
Crampin, S.Zatsepin, S. V. 1995. Production seismology: the use of shear waves to monitor and model production in a poro-reactive and interactive reservoir. 65th Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, Expanded Abstracts 199202.Google Scholar
Crampin, S.Zatsepin, S. V. 1996. Forecasting earthquakes with APE. In Seismology in Europe, Proceedings of the XXV General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Reykjavik, 31823.Google Scholar
Crampin, S.Zatsepin, S. V. 1997a. Changes of strain before earthquakes: the possibility of routine monitoring of both long-term and short-term precursors. Journal of Physics of the Earth 45, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S.Zatsepin, S. V. 1997b. Modelling the compliance of crustal rock: II—response to temporal changes before earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International 129, 495506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S., Evans, R., Üäer, B., Doyle, M., Davis, J. P., Yegorkina, G. V.Miller, A. 1980. Observations of dilatancy-induced polarization anomalies and earthquake prediction. Nature 286, 8747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S., Evans, R.Atkinson, B. K. 1984. Earthquake prediction: a new physical basis. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 76, 14756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S., Booth, D. C., Krasnova, M. A., Chesnokov, E. M., Maximov, A. B.Tarasov, N. T. 1986. Shear-wave polarizations in the Peter the First Range indicating crack-induced anisotropy in a thrust-fault regime. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 84, 40112.Google Scholar
Crampin, S., Booth, D. C., Evans, R., Peacock, S.Fletcher, J. B. 1990. Changes in shear wave splitting at Anza near the time of the North Palm Springs Earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Researches, 11 197212.Google Scholar
Crampin, S., Booth, D. C., Evans, R., Peacock, S.Fletcher, J. B. 1991. Comment on ‘Quantitative measurements of shear wave polarizations at the Anza seismic network, southern California: Implications for shear wave splitting and earthquake prediction’ by R. C. Aster, P. M. Shearer & J. Berger. Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 640314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S., Zatsepin, S. V., Slater, C.Brodov, L. Y. 1996. Abnormal shear-wave polarizations as indicators of pressures and over pressures. 58th Conference of the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, Amsterdam, Extended Abstracts 038.Google Scholar
Crampin, S., Rowlands, H. J., Zatsepin, S. V., Smart, B. J., Edleman, K.Crawford, B. 1997. Predicting the response to effective stress of cores with different pore fluids. 59th Conference of the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Amsterdam, Extended Abstracts 2, C022.Google Scholar
Crampin, S., Rowlands, H. J.Volti, T. 1998. Monitoring stress changes before earthquakes using seismic shear-wave splitting. In Earthquake-prediction research in a natural laboratory. ENV4-CT96-0252, PRENLAB Final Report, 37-44.Google Scholar
Davis, T. L., Benson, R. D., Roche, S. L.Talley, D. 1997. 4-D, 3-C seismology and dynamic reservoir characterization—a geophysical renaissance. 67th Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Dallas, Expanded Abstracts 1, 8802.Google Scholar
Evans, R. 1997. Assessment of schemes for earthquake prediction: Editor's introduction. Geophysical Journal International 131, 413420.Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Wang, P., Zheng, S., Wang, M.Chen, Y.-T. 1998. Temporal changes in shear-wave splitting at an isolated swarm of small earthquakes in 1992 near Dongfang, Hainan Island, Southern China. Geophysical Journal International 135, 10212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, R. J. 1996. VAN: a critical evaluation. In Lighthill, J. (ed.) A critical review of VAN, 155238. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Grasso, J. R. 1993. Triggering of self-organized system: implications for the state of the uppermost crust. In Young, R. P. (Ed.) Rockbursts and seismicity of mines, 18794. Balkema: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Grasso, J. R.Bachelery, P. 1995. Hierarchical organization as a diagnostic approach to volcano mechanics: validation on Piton de la Fournaise. Geophysical Research Letters 22, 2897900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffer, K. J.Bevan, T. G. 1990. Scaling relationships in natural fractures. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Paper 20981.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. A. 1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 64, 13350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisslinger, C.Suzuki, Z. 1978. Earthquake Precursors. Tokyo: Japan Sci. Soc. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. S., Chaudhry, N. A.Ahmed, S. 1994. Experimental ultrasonic velocities and permeability of sandstones with aligned cracks. 59th Conference of the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, Vienna, Extended Abstracts P113.Google Scholar
Kogan, Y. Y. 1992. Seismicity: turbulence of solids. Non-Linear Science Today 2, 213.Google Scholar
Leary, P. 1991. Deep borehole log evidence for fractal distribution of fractures in crystalline rock. Geophysical Journal International 107, 61527.Google Scholar
Leary, P. C. 1995. The cause of frequency-dependent seismic absorption in crustal rocks. Geophysical Journal International 12, 14351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X.-Y., Mueller, M. C.Crampin, S. 1993. Case studies of shear-wave splitting in reflection surveys in South Texas. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 29, 189215.Google Scholar
Liu, E., Crampin, S., Queen, J. H.Rizer, W. D. 1993a. Velocity and attenuation anisotropy caused by microcracks and macrofractures in multiazimuthal reverse VSPs. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 29, 17788.Google Scholar
Liu, E., Crampin, S., Queen, J. H., Rizer, W. D. 1993b. Behaviour of shear waves in rocks with two sets of parallel cracks. Geophysical Journal International 113, 50917.Google Scholar
Liu, E., Crampin, S.Hudson, J. A. 1997a. Diffraction of seismic waves by cracks with application to hydraulic fracturing. Geophysics 62, 25365.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Crampin, S. and Main, I. 1997b. Shear-wave anisotropy: spatial and temporal variations in time delays at Parkfield, Central California. Geophysical Journal International 130, 77185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, M. A.Winterstein, D. L. 1994. Seismic detection of a hydraulic fracture from shear-wave VSP data at Lost Hills field, California. Geophysics 59, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. 1880. Seismic science in Japan. Transactions of the Seismological Society of Japan 1, 333.Google Scholar
Nur, A.Simmons, G. 1969. Stress-induced anisotropy in rock: an experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research 74, 666774.Google Scholar
Peacock, S., Crampin, S., Booth, D. C.Fletcher, J. B. 1988. Shear-wave splitting in the Anza seismic gap, Southern California: temporal variations as possible precursors. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 333956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, C., Crampin, S., Brodov, L. Y.Kuznetsov, V. M. 1993. Observations of anisotropic cusps in transversely isotropic clay. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 29, 21626.Google Scholar
Zatsepin, S. V.Crampin, S. 1995. The metastable poro-reactive and interactive rockmass: anisotropic poro-elasticity. 65 th Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, Expanded Abstracts 91821.Google Scholar
Zatsepin, S. V.Crampin, S. 1996. Stress-induced coupling between anisotropic permeability and shear-wave splitting. 58th Conference of the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Amsterdam, Extended Abstracts C030.Google Scholar
Zatsepin, S. V.Crampin, S. 1997. Modelling the compliance of crustal rock: I—response of shear-wave splitting to differential stress. Geophysical Journal International 129, 47794.Google Scholar