Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:31:35.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to ‘The Torridonian Stac Fada Member: a discussion’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

I. S. Sanders
Affiliation:
I. S. Sanders and J. D. Johnston, Department of Geology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
J. D. Johnston
Affiliation:
I. S. Sanders and J. D. Johnston, Department of Geology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Extract

We welcome the views of A. D. Stewart (1990) on our interpretation of the unusual lithology and contact relations of the Stac Fada Member at Stoer. Stewart contends that our lower breccia body is a down-faulted outlier of the main breccia body and is therefore not a feeder. He thus rejects our notion that the Member is a peperitic extrusion: he also rejects the previously published view that the Member is a volcanic mudflow. Instead he suggests that the Stac Fada Member is one of several muddy volcanic horizons in the Stoer Group, all of which underwent post-depositional disturbance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stewart, A. D. 1990. The Torridonian Stac Fada Member: a discussion. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 81, 247.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J. & von Brunn, V. 1989. Melanges, intrusive and extrusive sediments and hydraulic arcs. GEOLOGY 17, 446448.Google Scholar