Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T10:30:30.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phylogeny of arachnomorph arthropods and the origin of the Chelicerata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Trevor J. Cotton
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK. e-mail: [email protected].
Simon J. Braddy
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol. BS8 1RJ, UK. e-mail: S. J. [email protected]

Abstract

A new hypothesis of the relationships between arachnomorph arthropods, and the origin of chelicerates, is presented based on a cladistic analysis of 34 taxa and 54 characters. The present study provides a detailed discussion of primary hypotheses of homology and includes a more complete range of terminal taxa than previous analyses. The analysis provides the first convincing synapomorphies for the Arachnomorpha, and suggests that the marrellomorphs are not arachnomorphs. The assignment of Cambrian ‘great appendage’ (or megacheiran) arthropods to the Arachnomorpha is confirmed, and potential synapomorphies uniting them with chelicerates are discussed and tested. Principal amongst these are the loss of the first cephalic appendages (the antennae), loss of the exopods of the second cephalic appendages and modification of the endopods of these appendages into spinose grasping organs. The Arachnomorpha consists of two major clades: (1) a ‘chelicerate-allied’ clade, including chelicerates, megacheirans, Emeraldella, Sidneyia, cheloniellids and aglaspidids, in which chelicerates and a paraphyletic group of megacherian arthropods form the sister group to the remaining taxa; and; (2) a ‘trilobite-allied’ clade, including trilobites, xandarellids, helmetiids, tegopeltids and naraoiids, the relationships of which are more fully resolved than in previous studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)