Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:44:50.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The perforated trilobite Laethoprusia gen. nov., and the phylogeny of Koneprusia and Isoprusia (Odontopleuridae, Koneprusiinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Lars Ramsköld
Lars Ramsköld
Affiliation:
Lars Ramsköld, Sektionen för paleozoologi, Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The subfamily Koneprusiinae is revised as part of a larger study of the Odontopleuridae, and Laethoprusia gen. nov. is described. The type species L. salax sp. nov. is from the Wenlock of Gotland, Sweden, and the genus is known also from the Wenlock of the Montagne Noire in south France, and from the Lower Devonian of Australia. The type species is most unusual among trilobites in possessing large fenestrae perforating the exoskeleton on segmental boundaries from the cephalic posterior margin to within the pygidium. The fenestrae were probably covered with soft tissues. Their function is enigmatic. Laethoprusia gen. nov. is the sister taxon to Isoprusia and/or Koneprusia. These genera are revised, and a review of all species assigned to them is given. A cladistic analysis of the best known taxa of Laethoprusia, Isoprusia, and Koneprusia is presented. Laethoprusia is the most derived genus of the subfamily, although stratigraphically it is the earliest.

Keywords

phylogenyOdontopleuridaeKoneprusiinaecladistic analysisPAUP
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , 1991 , pp. 125 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, G. K. B. 1967. Neue obersilurische sowie unter- und mitteldevonische Trilobiten aus Marokko, Deutschland und einigen anderen europäischen Gebieten. 2. SENCKENBERG LETH 48, 481–509.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1969. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mitteldevons. I. ABH SENCKENBERG NATURFORSCH GES 520, 1–692.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1970. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mitteldevons. II. ABH SENCKENBERG NATURFORSCH GES 525, 1–233.Google Scholar
Alberti, G. K. B. 1983. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mittel-Devons. IV. SENCKENBERG LETH 64, 1–88.Google Scholar
Alberti, H. 1969. Trilobiten (Harpidae und Odontopleuridae) aus dem Devon des Harzes und des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges. GEOL JAHRB 87, 361–82.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1846. Notice préliminaire sur le systême Silurien et les trilobites de Bohême. Leipsic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1852. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. 1 êre partie. Recherches paleontologiques 1. Crustacés, Trilobites. Prague and Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1872. Ibid. Supplément au vol. 1. Prague and Paris.Google Scholar
Beyrich, E. 1846. Untersuchungen über Trilobiten. Zweites Stück. Berlin.Google Scholar
Braniša, L. & Vaněk, J. 1973. Several new trilobite genera of the superfamily Dalmanitacea Vogdes, 1890 in the Devonian of Bolivia. VEST ÚSTŘED ÚSTAV GEOL 48, 97–102.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1966a. A new odontopleurid trilobite genus from the Devonian of Bohemia. PALAEONTOLOGY 9, 330–45.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1966b. A revision of the Swedish Ordovician Odontopleuridae (Trilobita). BULL GEOL INST UNIV UPPSALA 43, (8), 1–40.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Johnson, B. D. & Campbell, K. S. W. 1979. Silicified Lower Devonian trilobites from New South Wales. PALAEONTOL 22, 799–837.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. & Perry, D. G. 1983. Silicified Silurian odontopleurid trilobites from the Mackenzie Mountains. PALAEONTOGRAPHICA CANADIANA 1, 1–126.Google Scholar
Chaubet, M.-C. 1937. Contribution a l'étude géologique du Gothlandien du versant mériodonal de la Montagne Noire. TRAV LAB GEOL FAC SCI MONTPELLIER 1, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Chlupáč, I. 1969. Revision of the Middle Devonian trilobites from Horní Benešov in the Nízký Jeseník Mts. (Moravia). SBORNIK GEOL VED, PALEONTOL 10, 67–103.Google Scholar
Colless, D. H. 1985. On the status of outgroups in phylogenetics. SYST ZOOL 34, 364–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1974. The trilobites of the Chair of Kildare Limestone (Upper Ordovician) of eastern Ireland. Part 2. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 539, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erben, H. K. 1952. Trilobiten aus dem Älteren Hercyn (Unterdevon) des Unterharzes. NEUES JAHRB GEOL PALAONTOL ABH 94, 150–362.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1977. Le Siluro-Devonien du sud-est de la Montagne Noire (Hérault, France) et ses faunes de trilobites. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Gigout, M. 1951. Etudes géologiques sur la Méséta Marocaine occidentale (arrière pays de Casablanca, Mazagan et Safi). NOTES ET MÉMOIRES SERV GÉOL MAROC 86, 1–507.Google Scholar
Haas, W. 1969. Lower Devonian trilobites from central Nevada and northern Mexico. J PALEONTOL 43, 641–59.Google Scholar
Haas, W. & Mensink, H. 1969. Asteropyginae aus Afganistan (Trilobita). ABH AKA WISS LIT, MAT-NATURWISS KL 6, 1–62.Google Scholar
Hall, J. & Clarke, J. 1888. Descriptions of the trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill groups. GEOL SUR NEW YORK, PALAEONTOL 7, 1–236.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Prague: J. G. Calve.Google Scholar
Horný, R. & Bastl, F. 1970. Type specimens of fossils in the National Museum of Prague. Volume 1. Trilobita. Prague.Google Scholar
Kegel, W. 1926. Unterdevon von böhmischer Facies (Steinberger Kalk) in der Lindener Mark bei Giessen. ABH PREUSS GEOL LANDES-AMT N.F. 100, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Lütke, F. 1965. Zur Kenntnis herzynischer Trilobiten aus dem Unter- und Mitteldevon des Harzes. PALAEONTOGR A124, 151–236.Google Scholar
Morzadec, P. 1983. Trilobites du Dévonien (Emsien-Famennien) de la rade de Brest (Massif Armoricain). PALAEONTOGR A181, 103–84.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. & Walossek, D. 1987. Morphology, ontogeny, and life habit of Agnostus pisiformis from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. FOSSILS AND STRATA 19, 1–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novàk, O. 1883. Zur Kenntnis der böhmischen Trilobiten. In: Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients; herausgegeben von E. Mojsisovics und M. Neumayr, 3, pp. 23–63. Wien.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1969. The trilobite Koneprusia in the Lower Devonian of Alaska. J PALEONTOL 43, 1210–2.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1972. Lower and Middle Devonian trilobite zoogeography in northern North America. Proc. Twenty-fourth International Geological Congress, Montreal P.Q., Section 7, 594–604.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1975. Siegenian trilobite zoogeography in Arctic North America. FOSSILS AND STRATA 4, 391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmólska, H. 1957. Trilobites from the Couvinian Wydryszów (Holy Cross Mts., Poland). ACTA PALAEONTOL POLONICA 2, 53–79.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G. & Chatterton, B. D. E. 1976. Phacops and other trilobites from Emsian age beds of the Delorme Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. CAN J EARTH SCI 13, 1466–78.Google Scholar
Pillet, J. 1973. Les trilobites du Dévonien inférieur et du Dévonien moyen du sud-est du Massif armoricain. SOC D'ÉTUDES SCI DE L'ANJOU, MÉM 1 (1972), 1–307.Google Scholar
Prantl, F. & Přibyl, A. 1949. A study of the superfamily Odontopleuracea nov. superfam. (trilobites). ROZPRAVY ÚSTŘED ÚSTAV GEOL 12, 1–221. (In Czech and English, with Russian summary.)Google Scholar
Přibyl, A & Vaněk, J. 1966. Zur Kenntnis der Odontopleuridae-Trilobiten aus dem böhmischen Altpälaozoikum. ACTA UNIV CAROLINAE, GEOL 4, 289–304.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. & Vaněk, J. 1973. Über Hypostome von Odontopleuriden (Trilobita) und ihrer Systematik. ČASOPIS PRO MINERAL GEOL 18, 301–7.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. 1991. Pattern and process in the evolution of the Odontopleuridae (Trilobita). The Selenopeltinae and Ceratocephalinae. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 82, 143–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsköld, L. & Chatterton, B. D. E. in press. Revision and subdivision of the polyphyletic ‘Leonaspis’ (Trilobita). TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 82. (In press.)Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1917a. Uber die Einteilung der Familie Acidaspidae und über einige ihrer devonischen Vertreter. ZENTRALBLATT MINERAL, GEOL PALÄONTOL 1917, 462–72.Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1917b. Paläontologische Beobachtungen; im Rheinischen Devon. I. Über einzelne Arten von Acidaspis, Lichas, Cheirurus, Aristozoë, Prosocoelus, Terebratula und; Spirophyton aus der Eifel. JAHRB NASSAUISCHEN VEREINS NATURKUNDE WIESBADEN 70, 143–61.Google Scholar
Smeenk, Z. 1983. Devonian trilobites of the southern Cantabrian Mountains (northern Spain) with a systematic description of the Asteropyginae. LEIDSE GEOL MED 52, 383–511.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1984. Revision of the trilobite type material of I. Hawle and A. J. C. Corda, 1847. SBORNIK NAROD MUZEA V PRAZE, ŘADA B39 (1983), 129–212.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1986. Bohemian representatives of the trilobite genera Orphanaspis, Selenopeltoides Taemasaspis (Odontopleuridae). ČASOPIS NAROD MUZEA V PRAZE 153 (1984), 212–16.Google Scholar
Termier, G. & Termier, H. 1950. Paléontologie Marocaine II. Invertébrés de l'Ére primaire. Fasc. IV. Annelides, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Conularides et Graptolithes. NOTES ET MÉMOIRES SERV GÉOL MAROC 79, 1–277.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. 1962. Předbězná zpráva o paleontologických výzkumech několita lokalit v silura a devonu Velké Prahy. ZPRAVY O GEOLOGICKYCH VYZKUMECH V R. 1961, 81–85.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. & Pek, I. 1987. Genus Koneprusia (Trilobita) from the Devonian of central Bohemia. ČASOPIS PRO MINERAL GEOL 32, 262–70.Google Scholar
Weber, V. N. 1932. Trilobity Turkestana [Trilobites of the Turkestan]. VSESOYUSNOE GEOLOGO-RAZVEDOCHNOE OB'EDINENIE 1–4, 1–157. (In Russian, with English summary).Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Evitt, W. R. 1954. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites. MEM GEOL SOC AM 59, 1–137.Google Scholar