Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:39:47.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modes of life of arthropods from the Burgess Shale, British Columbia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

D. E. G. Briggs  and
H. B. Whittington
D. E. G. Briggs
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of London, Goldsmiths' College, Rachel McMillan Building, Creek Road, London SE8 3BU, England.
H. B. Whittington
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The modes of life of twenty three species of arthropods from the Shale are reviewed, with special reference to locomotion and feeding. Six groups are recognised, predatory and scavenging benthos, deposit-feeding benthos, scavenging and possibly predatory nektobenthos, deposit-feeding and scavenging nektobenthos, nektonic filter-feeders, and a miscellaneous sixth group that includes a questionable example of parasitism and a species that doubtfully grazed on algae. These animals had but limited powers of walking, digging, raking or swimming. Within these limitations a range of morphological adaptations and modes of feeding had been evolved, by Middle Cambrian time, a range comparable to that found in Recent marine forms. Arthropods in the Shale dominated, in numbers of individuals and possibly in biomass, a fauna dwelling above, on and in a muddy substrate at a depth of about 100 m.

Keywords

feedinglocomotionMiddle Cambrianpalaeoecology
Type
Evidence for life habits from exceptionally preserved faunas
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 76 , Issue 2-3: Fossil Anthropods as Living Animals , 1985 , pp. 149 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, J. D. & McIlreath, I. A. 1984. The Cathedral Reef escarpment, a Cambrian great wall with humble origins. GEOS ENERGY MINES RESOUR CAN 13(1), 17–9.Google Scholar
Birenheide, R. 1971. Beobachtungen am “Scheinstern” Mimetaster aus dem Hunsrück-Schiefer. SENCKENBERGIANA LETHEA 52(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1976. The arthropod Branchiocaris n. gen., Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. GEOL SURV CAN BULL 264, 1–29.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1977. Bivalved arthropods from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. PALAEONTOLOGY 20, 595–621.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1978. The morphology, mode of life, and affinities of Canadaspis perfecta (Crustacea: Phyllocarida), Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 281, 439–87.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1981. The arthropod Odaraia alata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 291, 541–85.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. 1983. Affinities and early evolution of the Crustacea: the evidence of the Cambrian fossils. In Schram, F. R. (ed.) Crustacean Phylogeny, pp. 1–22. Rotterdam; Balkema.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. & Robison, R. A. 1984. Exceptionally preserved nontrilobite arthropods and Anomalocaris from the Middle Cambrian of Utah. UNIV KANSAS PALEONTOL CONTRIB, Paper 111.Google Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G. & Whittington, H. B. 1981. Relationships of arthropods from the Burgess Shale and other Cambrian sequences. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.) Short Papers for the 2nd International Symposium on the Cambrian System, pp. 38-41. U S GEOL SURV OPEN-FILE REP 81–743.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1981. The arthropod Sidneyia inexpectans, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 295, 619–56.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L., Jensen, A. & Jacquet, R. 1985. The use of models in the understanding of Cambrian arthropod morphology. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH EARTH SCI 76, 365–9.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. & Whittington, H. B. 1983. Emeraldella and Leanchoilṫa, two arthropods from the Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 300, 553–85.Google Scholar
Collins, D., Briggs, D. E. G. & Conway Morris, S. 1983. New Burgess Shale fossil sites reveal Middle Cambrian faunal complex. SCIENCE 222, 163–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway Morris, S. 1979a. The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) fauna. ANNU REV ECOL SYST 10, 327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1979b. Burgess Shale. In Fairbridge, R. W. & Jablonski, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Paleontology, pp. 153–60. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 1981. The Burgess Shale fauna as a mid-Cambrian community. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.) Short Papers for the 2nd International Symposium on the Cambrian System, pp. 47-9. U S GEOL SURV OPEN-FILE REP 81–743.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Robison, R. A. 1982. The enigmatic medusoid Peytoia and a comparison of some Cambrian biotas. J PALEONTOL 56, 116–22.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. & Whittington, H. B. 1979. The animals of the Burgess Shale. SCI AM 241, 122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., Whittington, H. B., Briggs, D. E. G., Hughes, C. P. & Bruton, D. L. 1982. Atlas of the Burgess Shale. London: Palaeontological Association.Google Scholar
Coull, B. C. & Bell, S. S. 1983. Biotic assemblages: populations and communities. In Vernberg, F. J. & Vernberg, W. B. (eds) Behaviour and Ecology. Vol. 7 of D. E. Bliss (ed.) The Biology of Crustacea, pp. 283–319. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Delle Cave, L. & Simonetta, A. M. 1975. Notes on the morphology and taxonomic position of Aysheaia (Onycophora?) and of Skania (undetermined phylum). MONIT ZOOL ITAL 9, 67–81.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1971. Geological setting of the Burgess Shale. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago, 1969, I, 1155–70. Lawrence, Kansas: Allen.Google Scholar
Grahame, J. 1983. Adaptive aspects of feeding mechanisms. In Vernberg, F. J. & Vernberg, W. B. (eds) Environmental Adaptations. Vol. 8 of D. E. Bliss (ed.) The Biology of Crustacea, pp. 65–107. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, L. F. & Gunther, V. G. 1981. Some Middle Cambrian fossils of Utah. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV GEOL STUD 28, 1–87.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. (ed.) 1977. Patterns in evolution as illustrated by the fossil record. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1975. Redescription of Burgessia bella from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia. FOSSILS STRATA 4, 415–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, S. M. 1977. The Arthropoda. Habits, functional morphology and evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, P. A. 1982. Comparative morphology of crustacean appendages. In Abele, L. G. (ed.) Embryology, Morphology and Genetics. Vol. 2 of D. E. Bliss (ed.) The Biology of Crustacea, pp. 197–256. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1951. Middle Cambrian stratigraphy and faunas of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. SMITHSON MISC COLLECT 116(5), 1–277.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1984. New occurrences of the unusual trilobite Naraoia from the Cambrian of Idaho and Utah. UNIV KANSAS PALEONTOL CONTRIB, Paper 112.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1960. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay III. The structure of the soft-bottom community. LIMNOL OCEANOGR 5, 138–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. 1962. Note sugli artropodi non trilobiti della burgess shale, cambriano medio della Columbia Britannica (Canada). MONIT ZOOL ITAL 69, 172–85.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. 1963. Osservazioni sugli artropodi non trilobiti della ‘Burgess Shale’ (Cambriano medio). MONIT ZOOL ITAL 70–71, 99–108.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. 1964. Osservazioni sugli artropodi non trilobiti della ‘Burgess Shale’ (Cambriano medio). III contributo. MONIT ZOOL ITAL 72, 215–31.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. 1970. Studies on non trilobite arthropods of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrians). PALAEONTOGR ITAL 66 (new series 36), 35–45.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. & Delle Cave, L. 1975. The Cambrian non trilobite arthropods from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. A study of their comparative morphology, taxinomy and evolutionary significance. PALAEONTOGR ITAL 69 (new series 39), 1–37.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. & Delle Cave, L. 1981. An essay in the comparative and evolutionary morphology of Palaeozoic arthropods. ATTI CONV LINCEI ROMA 49, 389–439.Google Scholar
Stürmer, W. & Bergström, J. 1976. The arthropods Mimetaster and Vachonisia from the Devonian Hunsrück Shale. PALÄONTOL Z 50, 78–111.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1971a. The Burgess Shale: history of research and preservation of fossils. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago 1969. I, 1170–201. Lawrence, Kansas: Allen.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1971b. Redescription of Marrella splendens (Trilobitoidea) from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. GEOL SURV CAN BULL 209, 1–24.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1974. Yohoia Walcott and Plenocaris n. gen., arthropods from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. GEOL SURV CAN BULL 231, 1–21 (Figs. 1-6 of Plate X should be interchanged with figures 1-5 of Plate XII).Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1975. Trilobites with appendages from the Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. FOSSILS STRATA 4, 97–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1977. The Middle Cambrian trilobite Naraoia, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 280, 409–43.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1978. The lobopod animal Aysheaia pendunculata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 284, 165–97.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1979. Early arthropods, their appendages and relationships. In House, M. R. (ed.) The origin of major invertebrate groups, pp. 253–68. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1980a. Exoskeleton, moult stage, appendage morphology and habits of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Olenoides serratus. PALAEONTOLOGY 23, 171–204.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1980b. The significance of the fauna of the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. PROC GEOL ASS 91, 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1981. Rare arthropods from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B 292, 329–57.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B.In press. Tegopelte gigas, a second soft-bodied trilobite from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. J PALEONTOL.Google Scholar