Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:37:43.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—Some Ecological Aspects of the Intertidal Area of the Estuary of the Aberdeenshire Dee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Alec Milne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the seaward direction in an estuary there are usually the following main gradients:—

(a) Increase in osmotic pressure (total salt content, especially chlorides).

(b) Increase in calcium and magnesium content.

(c) Increase in alkalinity.

(d) Increase in winter and decrease in summer temperature.

(e) Increase in light penetration.

There are other gradients of less importance. The first three are dependent on salinity. Thus, from the ecological standpoint, the three important physical observations relative to the study of estuarine life are the salinity, temperature, and light (silt content) gradients.

Ecological studies are directed towards the elucidation of two types of problems:

(i) Characteristics of the physical environment relevant to the distribution of specific forms of life.

(ii) The growth of mixed populations and their interrelations in a homogeneous environment or in a physical gradient.

The present study concerns itself especially with the former, and to a less extent with the latter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , 1941 , pp. 107 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A., and Bassindale, R., 1935. “Survey of the River Tees, Part II. The Estuary—Chemical and Biological,” Water Pollution Research, Technical Paper no. 5. H.M. Stationery Office, London. Google Scholar
Alexander, W. B., 1932. “The Salinity of the Water retained in the Muddy Foreshore of an Estuary,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xviii, p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beudant, , 1816. Vide Flattely and Walton, 1922, below.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R., 1928. “Physical Factors on the Sandy Beach. Part I. Tidal, Climatic and Edaphic,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xv, pp. 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, E. H., 1927. “The Distribution of the Larger Brown Algæ in River Estuaries in Aberdeenshire,” Bot. Soc. Edin. Trans. (29–30), 1924–1930.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N., and Milne, A., 1938. “The Ecology of the Tamar Estuary. II. Underwater Illumination,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xxii, pp. 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C., 1933. The Ecology of Animals, London.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1931. “Sur la Pénétration des Diverses Espèces Marines Sessiles dans les Estuaires et sa Limitation par l'Eau Douce,” Ann. Inst. Océanogr., vol. x, f. viii, pp. 217–243.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. “Observations et Expériences sur le Peuplement des Côtes Rocheuses par les Cirripèdes,” Bull. Inst. Océanogr. Monaco, no. 592, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1933. “Nouvelles Observations sur l'Ordre d'Euryhalinité des Espèces Littorales,” Bull. Inst. Oceanogr., no. 619, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1934. “Faune et Flore de Saint-Servain en 1934,” Bull. Lab. Saint-Servain, f. 13, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1935. “Histoire d'une Moulière,” Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg., t. lxix, pp. 152–177.Google Scholar
Flattely, F. W., and Walton, C. L., 1922. The Biology of the Seashore, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T., and Spooner, G. M., 1938. “The Ecology of the Tamar Estuary. I. Introduction,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xxii, pp. 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntsman, A. G., 1918. “The Vertical Distribution of Certain Intertidal Animals,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, vol. xii (ser. 3), section iv, pp. 53–60.Google Scholar
Margaria, R., 1931. “The Osmotic Changes in some Marine Animals,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cvii, pp. 606–624.Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. “The Ecology of the Tamar Estuary. III. Salinity and Temperature Conditions in the Lower Estuary,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xxii, pp. 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935. “The Biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to Environmental Factors,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xx, pp. 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. “A Report on the Fauna of the Estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xvi, pp. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirrie, M. E., Bruce, J. R., and Moore, H. B., 1932. “A Quantitative Study of the Fauna of the Sandy Beach at Port Erin,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xviii, pp. 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1930. “I. Salinity Interchange between Seawater in Sand and Overflowing Freshwater at Low Tide,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xvi, pp. 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1932. Ibid., vol. xviii, pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
Schlieper, C., 1929. “Uber die Einwirkung niederer Slazkonzentrationen auf Marine Organismen,” Zeits. Verg. Physiol., vol. ix, p. 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semper, K., 1899. Animal Life, 5th ed., London. Vide Flattely and Walton, above.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L., 1935. “Observations on Gammarus zaddachi Sexton, an Estuarine Amphipod, and Associated Forms,” Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., vol. xxxii, pp. 285–294.Google Scholar