Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:31:27.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First caddisflies (Trichoptera) in Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Wilfried Wichard  and
Dany Azar
Wilfried Wichard*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology Education, University of Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, D-50923 Köln, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Dany Azar
Affiliation:
Life and Earth Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences II, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon. Email: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lebanese amber contains a diverse biota from the Lower Cretaceous, and more than 150 families of arthropods have been reported as inclusions. Amongst these, caddisflies (Trichoptera) are very scarce inclusions, consisting of a few indeterminate fragments and only two inclusions that permit clear descriptions of new species. We describe the first two Trichoptera species from Lebanese amber, belonging respectively to Dipseudopsidae (Phylocentropus succinolebanensis n. sp.) and Ecnomidae (Ecnomus cretacia n. sp.). Previously, the oldest fossil representatives of both families were known from the Upper Cretaceous amber of New Jersey for Dipseudopsidae and from the Eocene Baltic amber for Ecnomidae.

Keywords

EcnomidaeEcnomusDipseudopsidaefossil insectsPhylocentropus
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 107 , Issue 2-3: Fossil Insects, Arthropods and Amber , June 2016 , pp. 213 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4. References

Azar, D., Perrichot, V., Neraudeau, D. & Nel, A., 2003. New psychodid flies from the Cretaceous ambers of Lebanon and France, with a discussion about Eophlebotomusconnectens Cockerell, 1920 (Diptera, Psychodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96(2), 117–27.10.1603/0013-8746(2003)096[0117:NPFTCA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Azar, D., Gèze, R., El-Samrani, A., Maalouly, J. & Nel, A. 2010. Jurassic Amber in Lebanon. – Acta Geologica Sinica [English Edition] 84(4), 977–83.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1905. Descriptions of New Nearctic Neuropteroid Insects. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 32, 1–20.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1907. Descriptions of new Trichoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 8, 117–33.Google Scholar
Barnard, P. C. & Clark, F. 1986. The larval morphology and ecology of a new species from Lake Naivasha, Kenya (Trichoptera, Ecnomidae). Aquatic Insects 8(3), 175–83.10.1080/01650428609361249Google Scholar
Betten, C. 1934. The Caddis Flies or Trichoptera of New York State. Bulletin of the New York State Museum 292, 1–576.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L. 1992. Trichoptera of the Levant: Imagines. Fauna Palestina – Insecta VI. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities. 293 pp.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L., Johnson, R. O. & Dillon, P. R. 1998. New Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from Upper Cretaceous amber of New Jersey, U.S.A. Polish Journal of Entomology 67, 219–31.Google Scholar
Frania, H. E. & Wiggins, G. B. 1997. Analysis of morphological and behavioural evidence for the phylogeny and higher classification of Trichoptera (Insecta). Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum 160, 1–67.Google Scholar
Granier, B., Toland, C., R Gèze, R., Azar, D. & Maksoud, S. 2016. Some steps toward a new story for the Jurassic. Cretaceous transition in Mount Lebanon Carnets Geol. 16(8), 247–69.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M. S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. New York: Cambridge University Press. 755 pp.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1861. Synopsis of the Neuroptera of North America with a list of the South American species. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution. 347 pp.10.5962/bhl.title.60275Google Scholar
Hoffeins, H. W. 2001. On the preparation and conservation of amber inclusions in artificial resins. Polish Journal of Entomology 70, 215–19.Google Scholar
Holzenthal, R. W., Morse, J. C. & Kjer, K. M. 2010. Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813. Zootaxa 3148, 209–11.10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.40Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. D. & Sukatcheva, I. D. 2002. Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813. – The caddisflies (= Phryganeida Latreille, 1810). In Rasnitsyn, A. P. & Quicke, D. L. J. (eds) History of Insects, 199–222. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. xii+517 pp.Google Scholar
Johanson, K. A. & Espeland, M. 2010. Phylogeny of the Ecnomidae (Insecta: Trichoptera). Cladistics 26, 36–48.10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00276.xGoogle Scholar
Kirby, W. 1815. Strepsiptera, a new order of insects proposed, and the characters of the order, with those of its genera. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London Zoology 11, 86–122.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1813.tb00040.xGoogle Scholar
Kjer, K. M., Blahnik, R. J. & Holzenthal, R. W. 2001. Phylogeny of Trichoptera (caddisflies): characterization of signal and noise within multiple datasets. Systematic Biology 50, 781–816.10.1080/106351501753462812Google Scholar
Maksoud, S., Granier, B., Azar, D., Gèze, R., Paicheler, J.-C. & Moreno-Bedmar, J. A. 2014. Revision of “Falaise de BLANCHE” (Lower Cretaceous) in Lebanon, with the definition of a Jezzinian Regional Stage. Carnets de Géologie [] 14, 401–27.Google Scholar
Maksoud, S., Azar, D., Granier, B. & Gèze, R. 2016. New data on the age of the Lower Cretaceous amber outcrops of Lebanon. Palaeoworld 26, 331–38.10.1016/j.palwor.2016.03.003Google Scholar
Martynov, A. V. 1924. Rucheiniki (caddisflies). Prakticheskaya Entomologiya 5, 1–384.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1864. On the trichopterous genus Polycentropus, and the allied genera. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 1, 25–31.Google Scholar
Melnitsky, S. I. 2009. A New Caddisfly of the Fossil Genus Archaeotinodes (Insecta: Trichoptera: Ecnomidae) from the Baltic Amber. Paleontological Journal 43 (3), 296–99.10.1134/S0031030109030071Google Scholar
Melnitsky, S. I. 2013. Archaeotinodes ivanovi sp. nov., a new fossil species of Ecnomidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) from the Baltic amber. Paleontological Journal 47 (4), 407–09.10.1134/S0031030113040114Google Scholar
Melnitsky, S. I. & Ivanov, V. D. 2013. Three new caddisflies species of the fossil genus Archaeotinodes (Insecta: Trichoptera: Ecnomidae) from the Baltic amber. Zootaxa 3635, 261–68.Google Scholar
Morse, J. C. 2016. Trichoptera World Checklist. Available from http://www.clemson.edu/cafls/departments/esps/database/trichopt/index.htm (accessed September 2016).Google Scholar
Nohra, Y., Azar, D., Gèze, R., Maksoud, S., El-Samrani, A. & Perrichot, V. 2013. New Jurassic amber outcrops from Lebanon. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 6, 27–51.10.1163/18749836-06021056Google Scholar
Rambur, J. P. 1842. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, Névroptères. – Librairie encyclopédique de Roret. Paris: Fain et Thunot. 534 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. 1965. The evolutionary history of Phylocentropus (Trichoptera: Psychomyiidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 38, 398–400.Google Scholar
Ross, H. H. & Gibbs, D. G. 1973. The subfamily relationships of the Dipseudopsinae (Trichoptera, Polycentropodidae). Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 8, 312–16.Google Scholar
Schuster, G. A. &. Hamilton, S. W. 1984. The genus Phylocentropus in North America (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). In Morse, J. C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Trichoptera, 347–62. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk. 486 pp.Google Scholar
Scott, K. M. 1968. A new species of Ecnomus McLachlan (Trichoptera: Psychomyidae) from South Africa. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 31 (2), 411–15.Google Scholar
Sukatsheva, I. D. 1993. Oldest Polycentropodidae (Trichoptera) from Mongolia. Paleontological Journal 27, 192–96.Google Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1946. Trichoptera from the River Jordan, Palestine. Opuscula Entomologica Lund 11, 132–36.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1903. Über die Metamorphose der Trichopteren. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 18, 1–154.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1904. Über westafrikanische Trichopteren. Zoologischer Anzeiger 28, 353–59.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1912. Die Trichopteren des Baltischen Bernsteins. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens 10, 1–380.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. J. & Morse, J. C. 1986. Evolution of feeding and case-making behavior in Trichoptera. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 5, 150–58.10.2307/1467869Google Scholar
Wichard, W. 2016. Anton Handlirsch (1865–1935), ein Wegbereiter der Paläoentomologie. Entomologica Austriaca 23, 151–62.Google Scholar
Wichard, W. & Bölling, A. C. 2000. Recent knowledge of caddis flies (Trichoptera) from Cretaceous amber of New Jersey. In Grimaldi, D. (ed.) Studies on Fossils in Amber, with Particular Reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey, 345–54. Leiden: Backhuys. 498 pp.Google Scholar
Wichard, W. & Luer, C. 2003. Phylocentropus swolenskyi n.sp., eine Köcherfliege aus dem New Jersey Bernstein (Trichoptera, Dipseudopsidae). Mitteilungen Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Hamburg 87, 131–40.Google Scholar