Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:20:10.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early ontogeny of the Furongian (Cambrian) olenid trilobites Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1838) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922 from Bornholm, Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Kristina Månsson  and
Euan N. K. Clarkson
Kristina Månsson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden Email: [email protected]
Euan N. K. Clarkson
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland UK Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The early stages in ontogenetic development are described in the co-occurring Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1838) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922, using fragmentary but otherwise well-preserved material from Bornholm, Denmark. The former species is a senior synonym of Ctenopyge (Eoctenopyge) angusta Westergård, 1922, as has been recently proposed, but the early stages of S. alatus from Bornholm are appreciably more spiny than those found of the same species in other places in Scandinavia, and spinosity is retained until later in development. Increasing convexity with development and other morphological changes are noted. Pygidia were previously unknown in C. (M.) tumida. Here, they are represented by early pygidia. These are shield-shaped, with a very spiny margin and a strong axial spine. The distinction between Sphaerophthalmus and Ctenopyge is discussed.

Keywords

Alum ShaleolenidsLeptoplastinaeScandinaviaTrilobita
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 171 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Adrain, J. 2011. Class Trilobita Walch 1771. In Zhang, Z. G. (ed.) Animal biodiversity, an outline of higher-level classification and taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 104–09.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P., Månsson, K., Clarkson, E. N. K. & Taylor, C. M. 2006. Faunal turnovers and trilobite morphologies in the Upper Cambrian Leptoplastus Zone at Andrarum, southern Sweden. Lethaia 39, 97–110.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P. & Terfelt, F. 2012. Furongian (Cambrian) agnostoids of Scandinavia and their implications for intercontinental correlation. Geological Magazine 149, 1001–12.Google Scholar
Anderson, A., Dahlman, B., Gee, D. G & Snäll, S. 1985. The Scandinavian Alum Shales. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Ca 56, 1–50.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologica Scandinavica. I: Crustacea formationis transitionis. Fasc. 2, 21–92. Leipzig, Lund: T. O. Weigel. 93 pp.Google Scholar
Balserio, D., Waisfeld, B. G. & Buatois, L. A. 2011. Unusual trilobite biofacies from the Lower Ordovician of the Argentine Cordillera Oriental: new insights into olenid palaeontology. Lethaia, 44, 58–75.Google Scholar
Bird, C. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2003. Observations on the ontogeny of the upper Cambrian trilobite Peltura scarabaeoides westergaardi Henningsmoen 1957. GFF 125, 177–80.Google Scholar
Boeck, C. P. B. 1838. Uebersicht der bisher in Norwegen gefundenen Formen der Trilobiten-Familie. In Keihau, B. M. (ed.) Gaea Norvegica 1, 138–45. Oslo: Johan Dahl, Christiania.Google Scholar
Brögger, W. C. 1882. Die silurischen Etagen 2 und 3 im Kristianiagebiet und auf Eker. Universitätsprogramm für 2. Semester 1882. Oslo: Kristiania. 376 pp.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeiter beschriebenen Arten. Berlin: Georg Reimer. 148 pp.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1973. Morphology and evolution of the eye in Upper Cambrian Olenidae (Trilobita) Palaeontology 16, 735–65.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1979. The visual system of trilobites. Palaeontology 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., Taylor, C. M. & Ahlberg, P. 1997. Ontogeny of the trilobite Parabolina spinulosa (Wahlenberg, 1818) from the upper Cambrian Alum Shales of Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 88, 69–89.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlgren, J. & Taylor, C. M. 2003. Structure, ontogeny, and moulting of the olenid trilobite Ctenopyge (Eoctenopyge) angusta Westergård 1922 from the upper Cambrian of Västergötland, Sweden. Palaeontology 47, 1–27.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlgren, J. & Taylor, C. M. 2004. Structure, ontogeny, and functional morphology of some spiny Ctenopyge species from Västergötland, Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 94(for 2003), 115–43.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. & Ahlberg, P. 2002. Ontogeny and morphology of a new, miniaturised and spiny olenid trilobite from southern Sweden. Palaeontology 45, 1–22.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. & Taylor, C. M. 1995a. The lost world of the olenid trilobites. Geology Today 11, 147–54.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. & Taylor, C. M 1995b. Ontogeny of the trilobite Olenus wahlenbergi Westergård, 1922 from the upper Cambrian Alum Shales of Andrarum, Skåne, Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 86, 13–34.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W & Rushton, A. W. A. 1992. Cambrian and early Tremadoc rocks of the Llangynog Inlier, Dyfed, South Wales, Geological Magazine 129, 543–52.Google Scholar
Dworatzek, M. 1987. Sedimentology and petrology of carbonate intercalations in the Upper Cambrian Olenid Shale facies of southern Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C 819, 1–73.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology 33, 529–76.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae with description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. 1 Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 1957, 1–303.Google Scholar
Høyberget, M. & Bruton, D. L. 2012. Revision of the trilobite genus Sphaerophthalmus and relatives from the Furongian (Cambrian) Alum Shale Formation. Oslo Region, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology 92, 433–50.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, R. 1933. Variationsstatistiches Untersuchungen über die “Artabwandlung” und “Artumbildung” and der Oberkambrische Gattung Olenus Dalm. Abhandlungen des Geologisches – Paläontologisches Institut der Universität Greifswald 10, 1–54.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, B. W. & Nielsen, A. T. 2005. The upper Cambrian trilobite Olenus at Andrarum, Sweden; a case study of iterative evolution? Palaeontology 48, 1041–56.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C. & Chatterton, B. D. E. 2007. Ontogeny of Parabolinella panosa (Olenidae, Trilobita) from the uppermost Furongian (Upper Cambrian) of northwestern Canada, with discussion of olenid protaspides. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 44, 1695–711.Google Scholar
Lee, G. L. and Choi, D. K. 1999. Ontogeny of the Late Cambrian trilobite Olenus asiaticus Kobayashi, 1944 from the Machari Formation of Korea. Geosciences Journal 3, 225–31.Google Scholar
Lindström, G. 1901. Researches on the visual organs of the trilobites. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 34, 1–86.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, G. 1880. Om försteningarne i de svenska lagren med Peltura och Sphaerophthalmus. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 5, 132–61.Google Scholar
Månsson, K. 1998. Middle Ordovician olenid trilobites (Triarthrus Green and Porterfieldia Cooper) from Jämtland, central Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 89, 47–62.Google Scholar
Månsson, K. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2012. Ontogeny of the upper Cambrian (Furongian) olenid trilobite Protopeltura aciculata (Angelin, 1854) from Skåne and Västergötland, Sweden. Palaeontology 55, 887–901.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. T., Weidner, T., Terfelt, F. & Høyberget, M. 2014. Upper Cambrian (Furongian) biostratigraphy in Scandinavia revisited: definition of superzones. GFF 136, 193–97.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1923. Bornholms Olenuslag og deres fauna. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse 40, 1–85.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864–1884. A monograph of the British trilobites. Palaeontographical Society (London) Monographs. 244 pp.Google Scholar
Schoenemann, B & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2015. Eyes and vision in the coeval Furongian trilobites Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1938) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922, from Bornholm, Denmark. Palaeontology 58, 133–40.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, N. H. 2000. Environmental fluctuations in the Olenus Zone (Upper Cambrian), southern Scandinavia: a geochemical approach. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 47, 53–61.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, N. H. 2001. Why barren intervals? A taphonomic study of the Scandinavian Alum Shale and its faunas. Lethaia 34, 271–85.Google Scholar
Schrank, E. 1973. Trilobiten aus Geschieben der oberkambrischen Stufen 3–5. Paläontologische Abhandlungen (A) 4, 805–91.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1940. Early descriptions of Norwegian trilobites. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 20, 113–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. & Rushton, A. W. A. 1971. The pre-Westphalian geology of the Warwickshire Coalfield. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain 35, 1–152.Google Scholar
Terfelt, F., Eriksson, M. E., Ahlberg, P. & Babcock, L. E. 2008. Furongian series (Cambrian) biostratigraphy of Scandinavia – a revision. Norwegian Journal of Geology 88, 73–87.Google Scholar
Terfelt, F., Ahlberg, P. & Eriksson, M. E. 2010. Complete record of Furongian polymerid trilobites and agnostids of Scandinavia – a biostratigraphical scheme. Lethaia 44, 8–14.Google Scholar
Tortello, M. F. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2003. Ontogeny of the Early Ordovician olenid trilobite Jujuyaspis keideli Kobayashi from northwestern Argentina. Ameghiniana 40, 257–75.Google Scholar
Tortello, M. F. & Clarkson, E. N. K. 2008. Ontogeny, structure and moulting of Parabolina frequens argentina (Kayser) (Trilobita, Olenidae) from the Furongian of northwestern Argentina. Ameghiniana 45, 13–31.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W. 1890. A Bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from 1698 to 1889 including a list of North American species and a systematic arrangement of genera. US Geological Survey Bulletin 63. Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey. 177 pp.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1922. Sveriges Olenidskiffer. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning. Ca 18, 1–205.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1947. Supplementary notes on the Upper Cambrian trilobites of Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning C 489, 1–34.Google Scholar
Whitworth, P. H. 1970. Ontogeny of the upper Cambrian trilobite Leptoplastus crassicornis (Westergård) from Sweden. Palaeontology 13, 100–11.Google Scholar
Żylińska, A. 2001. Late Cambrian trilobites from the Holy Cross Mountains, central Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 51, 333–83.Google Scholar