Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:48:48.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The beetle (Coleoptera) fauna of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2019

Alexander G. KIREJTSHUK ,
Alexander G. PONOMARENKO ,
Andrey S. KUROCHKIN ,
Anatoly V. ALEXEEV ,
Vadim G. GRATSHEV ,
Alexey Yu. SOLODOVNIKOV ,
Frank-Thorsten KRELL  and
Carmen SORIANO
Alexander G. KIREJTSHUK*
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya emb. 1, St Petersburg 199034, Russia. Email: [email protected] CNRS UMR 7205, CP 50, Entomologie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 45 rue Buffon, Paris F-75005, France.
Alexander G. PONOMARENKO
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya str. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia.
Andrey S. KUROCHKIN
Affiliation:
Samara National Research University, Moskovskoye shosse 34, Samara 443086, Russia.
Anatoly V. ALEXEEV*
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya str. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia.
Vadim G. GRATSHEV*
Affiliation:
Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya str. 123, Moscow 117647, Russia.
Alexey Yu. SOLODOVNIKOV
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of Denmark/University of Copenhagen, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Frank-Thorsten KRELL
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Denver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Boulevard, Denver, CO 80205-5798, USA.
Carmen SORIANO
Affiliation:
Advance Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 431-B002, 9700 S Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
*
*Corresponding author
*Corresponding author
*Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A review of the faunistic composition of the coleopterous taphocenoses from Bembridge Marls is given. Only two families (Cupedidae and Carabidae) have been recorded from this site before. A total of 31 families have been revealed and determined in the course of the recent study, and 42 species have been described: Agabus latissimus Ponomarenko, sp. nov. and Ilybius gratshevi Ponomarenko, sp. nov. from Dytiscidae; Neothanes europaeus Ponomarenko, sp. nov. from Carabidae; Spercheus punctatus Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Spercheus wightensis Ponomarenko, sp. nov. from Spercheidae, Hydrochara woodwardi Ponomarenko & Soriano, sp. nov. and Berosus barclayi Ponomarenko & Soriano, sp. nov. from Hydrophilidae; Ochthebius rossi Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., Eolimnebius fossilis Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., Hydraenites gracilimmus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., Metacoxites ventritalis Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., Davidraenites gratshevi Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., D. interruptus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. and D. spurcus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Hydraenidae; Aphodius vectis Krell, sp. nov. and Pentodon dorcus Krell, sp. nov. from Scarabaeidae; Scirtes calcariferens Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Scirtes khnzoryani Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Scirtes metepisternalis Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Scirtes wightensis Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Contacyphon insularis Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov., Contacyphon involutus Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov. and Contacyphon kozlovi Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov. from Scirtidae; Eucinetes nikolaevae Kirejtshuk & Ponomarenko, sp. nov. from Eucinetidae; Macropunctum rossi Alexeev, sp. nov. from Elateridae; Byrrhites bembridgensis Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Byrrhidae; Paralichas striatopunctatus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Ptilodactylidae; Trixagus barclayi Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Throscidae; Themus (?Telephorops) polyaki Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Cantharidae; Attalus flexus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Malachiidae; Epuraea (Epuraea) kozlovi Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov., Phenolia (Lasiodites) vanescens Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov., Prometopia europaea Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov., Cyllodes argutus Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov. and Coxollodes palaeogenicus Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov. from Nitidulidae; Telmatophilus britannicus Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov. from Cryptophagidae; Corticariites kozlovi Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Latridiidae; Orthoperites antiquus Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, sp. nov. from Corylophidae; Octotemnites sepultus Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Ciidae; Cyclodinus efficax Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Anthicidae; and Plateumaris robustus Kurochkin & Kirejtshuk, sp. nov., Plateumaris rubiconis Kurochkin & Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. and Plateumaris wightensis Kurochkin & Kirejtshuk, sp. nov. from Chrysomelidae. Byrrhites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Corticariites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Davidraenites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Eolimnebius Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Hydraenites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Metacoxites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov., Octotemnites Kirejtshuk, gen. nov. and Orthoperites Kirejtshuk & Kurochkin, gen. nov. are proposed as taxa, partly as formal ones with generic rank and include species described herein. For Plateumaris rubiconis sp. nov., a new subgenus Necrodexis Kurochkin & Kirejtshuk, subgen. nov. is proposed. A brief review of the published fossil records for the groups considered in the paper is made. The probable ecological circumstances of the lives of the groups and species considered are discussed in the paper, and comparison with other Palaeogene sites and some conclusions on probable climatic circumstances have been elaborated. The taxonomic interpretation of three fossil species from the Caenozoic is reconsidered. It is shown that the genus Miocyphon Wickham, 1914 can be scarcely regarded as a close relative of representatives of either Dascillidae or Scirtidae. ‘Phenolia' incapax Scudder, 1890 and Lithomacratria Wickham, 1914 are regarded here without family attribution, the first as a member of Cucujiformia (i.e., out of Nitidulidae) and the latter as a member of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea (i.e., out of both Anthicidae and Pyrochroidae).

Keywords

bionomycompositionnew taxaOligocenepalaeoenvironment
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 110 , Issue 3-4: The Fauna and Flora of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, UK, Volume 2 , September 2019 , pp. 405 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Abdullah, M. 1964. New heteromerous beetles (Coleoptera) from the Baltic amber of Eastern Prussia and Gum Copal of Zanzibar. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 116, 329–46+2 pls.Google Scholar
Abdullah, M. & Abdullah, A. 1968. The discovery and probable phylogenetic significance of Lathrobium (Palaeolobrathium) whitei, a new subgenus and species of the Paederinae (Col., Staphylinidae) from Baltic amber. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 104, 1–3, pl. 1.Google Scholar
Alekseev, V. I. & Jäch, M. A. 2016. Electrolichas circumbalticus gen. et sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea: Ptilodactylidae) from Baltic amber, the first anchytarsine toed-winged beetle described from Europe. Zootaxa 4136, 593–599.10.11646/zootaxa.4136.3.10Google Scholar
Alexeev, A. V. 1994. Jurassic and lower cretaceous buprestids (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) from Eurasia. Paleontological Journal 27(Suppl. lA), 9–24.Google Scholar
Alexeev, A. V. 2000. On Mesozoic Buprestids (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia. Paleontological Journal 34(Suppl. 3), S323–26.Google Scholar
Archibald, B. & Farrell, B. D. 2003. Wheeler's dilemma. Acta zoologica Cracoviensia 46(Suppl. Fossil Insects), 17–23.Google Scholar
Arillo, A. & Ortuno, V. M. 1997. First records of the families Anthicidae and Chrysomelidae from the Oligocene of Izarra (Alava, Spain). Coleopterists Bulletin 51, 293–297.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. W. T. & Nakane, T. 1956. A new genus of Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera) from Japan. Proceedings of the Royal entomological Society, London (B) 25, 212–213.Google Scholar
Askevold, I. S. 1987. The genus Neohaemonia Székessy in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae): systematics, reconstructed phylogeny and geographic history. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 113, 361–430.Google Scholar
Askevold, I. S. 1990a. Classification of Tertiary fossil Donaciinae of North America and their implications about evolutions of Donaciinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 2135–2145.10.1139/z90-297Google Scholar
Askevold, I. S. 1990b. Reconstructed phylogeny and reclassification of the genera of Donaciinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae 26, 601–664.Google Scholar
Aubé, C. 1836. Hydrocanthares et gyriniens. In Dejean, P. F. (ed.) Iconographie et histoire naturelle des Coléoptères d'Europe, 1–64, 6. Paris: Méquignon Père et Fils. 416 pp.Google Scholar
Baly, J. S. 1859. Descriptions of new genera and species of phytophagous insects. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4, 55–61, 124–28, 270–275.Google Scholar
Barthel, M. & Hetzer, H. 1982. Bernstein-Inklusen aus dem Miozän des Bitterfelder Raumes. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geologie B 28, 314–336.Google Scholar
Bedel, L. 1921. Faune de Coléoptères du bassin de la Seine. Tome IV. Deuxième Fascicule – Serricornia. Paris, Firmin-Didot, 165–234.Google Scholar
Beier, M. 1952. Miozäne und oligozäne Insekten aus Österreich und den unmittelbar angrenzenden Gebieten. Sitzungsberichte, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung 1: Biologie, Mineralogie, Erdkunde und verwandte Wissenschaften 161, 129–134.Google Scholar
Berendt, G. 1845–1856. Die im Bernstein befindlichen organischen Reste der Vorvelt. Danzig: Nikolaische Buchhandlung. 38 pp.Google Scholar
Berthol, A. A. 1827. Latreille's natürliche Familien des Thierreichs. Weimar: Industrie-Comptoire. 606 pp.Google Scholar
Billberg, G. J. 1820. Enumeratio Insectorum in Museo Billberg. Stockholm: Cadel. 138 pp.10.5962/bhl.title.49763Google Scholar
Blackburn, T. 1891. Further notes on Australian Coleoptera, with description of new genera and species. Part IX. The Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 14, 65–153.Google Scholar
Bode, A. 1953. Die Insektenfauna des osterniedersächsischen Oberen Lias. Palaeontographica 103, 1–375.Google Scholar
Bogri, A., Solodovnikov, A. & Żyła, D. 2018. Baltic amber impact on historical biogeography and palaeoclimate research: oriental rove beetle Dysanabatium found in the Eocene of Europe (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Paederinae). Papers in Palaeontology 4, 433–452.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1851. Insecta Caffraria annis 1838–1845 a F.A. Wahlberg collecta. Stockholm: Holmiae 1, 2, 299–626.Google Scholar
Bonelli, F. A. 1810. Observations entomologiques (Carabes). I. Memoria Real Academia di Scienze, Torino 18, 21–78.Google Scholar
Borowiec, L. 1985. Two new species of Lathridius sensu lato (Coleoptera, Lathridiidae from Baltic amber. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 55, 251–254.Google Scholar
Branden, C. van dem 1885. Catalogue des Coléoptères carnassier aquatic Haliplidae, Amphizoidae, Pelobiidae et Dytiscidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 29, 5–116.Google Scholar
Britton, E. B. 1960. Beetles from the London clay (Eocene) of Bognor Regis, Sussex. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 4, 27–50, pls. 2–7.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B. 1878. On the discovery of a large and varied series of fossil insects and other associated fossils, in the Eocene (Tertiary) strata of the Isle of Wight. Annual Meeting of the Warwickshire Naturalists' and Archaeologists' Field Club 1878, 1–12.Google Scholar
Brodie, P. B. 1894. Notes on the Eocene Tertiary insects of the Isle of Wight. Proceedings of the Warwickshire Naturalists' and Archaeologists' Field Club, 39th Annual Report, 67–70.Google Scholar
Brongniart, C. J. E. 1877. Note sur des perforations observées dans deux morceaux de bois fossile. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, Bulletin 5 sér., 7, 215–220.Google Scholar
Broun, T. 1893. Manual of the New Zealand Coleoptera. Parts V, VI, VII. Wellington: New Zealand Institute, pp. i–xvii, 975–1504.Google Scholar
Broun, T. 1919. A new genus of Hydraenidae from New Zealand. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 59, 108–109.Google Scholar
Bukejs, A., Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Rücker, W. H. 2011. New species of Latridius (Coleoptera: Latridiidae) from Baltic amber. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 11, 203–207.Google Scholar
Bukejs, A., Rieke, H. P. & Rücker, W. H. 2012a. Enicmus adrianae sp. nov. – a new scavenger beetle (Coleoptera: Latridiidae) from Baltic amber. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 12, 149–154.Google Scholar
Bukejs, A., Rücker, W. H. & Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2012b. Cartodere (Aridius) succinobaltica sp. nov. (Coleoptera: Latridiidae) from Baltic amber. Latridiidae 9, 25–28.Google Scholar
Bukejs, A. & Nadein, K. 2013. A second species of Psyllototus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) from the Upper Eocene Baltic amber. Zootaxa 3609, 465–470.Google Scholar
Cai, C., Huang, D. & Solodovnikov, A. 2011. A new species of Hesterniasca (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Tachyporinae) from the Early Cretaceous of China with discussion of its systematic position. Insect Systematics & Evolution 42, 213–220.Google Scholar
Cai, C., Huang, D., Thayer, M. K. & Newton, A. F. 2012. Glypholomatine rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): a Southern Hemisphere recent group recorded from the Middle Jurassic of China. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 85, 239–244.Google Scholar
Cai, C., Yan, E. V., Beattie, R., Wang, B. & Huang, D. 2013a. First rove beetles from the Jurassic Talbagar fish bed of Australia (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Journal of Paleontology 87, 650–656.Google Scholar
Cai, C., Yan, E. V. & Vasilenko, D. V. 2013b. First record of Sinoxytelus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) from the Urey locality of Transbaikalia, Russia, with discussion on its systematic position. Cretaceous Research 41, 237–241.Google Scholar
Cai, C. & Huang, D. 2010. Current knowledge on Jurassic staphylinids of China (Insecta, Coleoptera). Earth Science Frontiers 17, Special Issue, 151–153.Google Scholar
Cai, C. Y. & Wang, B. 2013. The oldest silken fungus beetle from the Early Cretaceous of southern China (Coleoptera: Cryptophagidae: Atomariinae). Alcheringa 37, 452–455.Google Scholar
Casey, T. L. 1885. New genera and species of California Coleoptera. Bulletin of the California Academy of Sciences 4, 283–336.Google Scholar
Casey, T. L. 1912. Descriptive catalogue of the American Byrrhidae. Memoirs on the Coleoptera 3, 1–69.Google Scholar
Champion, G. C. 1897. Dascillidae. In Godman, F. D. & Salvin, O. (eds) Biologia Centrali-Americana. Coleoptera, 3, 585–690 + XXV, pls. 24–27. London: R. H. Porter.Google Scholar
Chang, H., Kirejtshuk, A. & Ren, D. 2010. New fossil elaterids (Coleoptera: Polyphaga: Elateridae) from the Jehol Biota in China. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103, 866–874.Google Scholar
Chang, H., Muona, J., Hanyong, P., Li, X., Chen, W., Teräväinen, M., Ren, D., Qiang, Y., Xingliao, Z. & Songhai, J. 2016. Chinese Cretaceous larva exposes a southern Californian living fossil (Insecta, Coleoptera, Eucnemidae). Cladistics 32, 211–214.Google Scholar
Chapin, E. A. 1927. The North American species of Ptilodactyla (coleoptera: Helodidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 53, 241–249.Google Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S. 2018. A review of the fossil history of Staphylinoidea. In Betz, O., Irmler, U. & Klimaszewski, J. (eds) Biology of rove beetles (Staphylinidae): life history, evolution, ecology and distribution, 27–45. Champaign, IL: Springer.Google Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S., Cashion, M. E., Engel, M. S. & Falin, Z. H. 2012a. A new genus of Ptilodactylidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma). Geodiversitas 34, 569–574.Google Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S., Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S. & Fraser, N. C. 2012b. Leehermania prorova, the earliest staphyliniform beetle, from the late Triassic of Virginia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). American Museum Novitates 3761, 1–28.10.1206/3761.2Google Scholar
Chatzimanolis, S. & Engel, M. 2011. A new species of Diochus from Baltic amber (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Diochini). ZooKeys 138, 65–73.Google Scholar
Clark, H. 1866. An examination of the Halticinae of South America. The Journal of Entomology 2, 375–412.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. J. & Chatzimanolis, S. 2009. Antiquity and long-term morphological stasis in a group of rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): Description of the oldest Octavius species from Cretaceous Burmese amber and a review of the “Euaesthetine subgroup” fossil record. Cretaceous Research 30, 1426–1434.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917a. Insects in Burmese amber. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 10, 323–329.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917b. Arthropods in Burmese amber. American Journal of Science, New Haven 44, 360–368.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1921. Some British fossil insects. Canadian Entomologist 53, 22–23.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1926. Tertiary fossil insects from Argentina. American Journal of Science 5, 501–504.Google Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1936. The fauna of the Sunchal (or Margas Verdes) formation, Northern Argentina. American Museum, Novitates 886, 1–9.Google Scholar
Crowson, R. A. 1960. The phylogeny of Coleoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 5, 111–134.Google Scholar
Crowson, R. A. 1962. Observation on the beetle family Cupedidae, with description of two new fossil forms and a key to the recent genera. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 13 ser. 5, 147–157.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1829. British entomology, being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insects found in Great Britain and Ireland 6, 242–289. London: L. Reeve and Co.Google Scholar
Dellacasa, G., Bordat, P. & Dellacasa, M. 2001. A revisional essay of world genus-group taxa of Aphodiinae (Coleoptera, Aphodiidae). Memorie della Società Entomologica Italiana 79, 3–482.Google Scholar
Dolin, V. G. 1973. Fossil forms of click beetles (Elateridae, Coleoptera) from the Lower Jurassic of the Middle Asia. In Yaroshenko, M. (ed.) Fauna and biology of insects of Moldavia, 71–82. Kishinyev: Shtiintza. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dolin, V. G. 1975. To systematics of Mesozoic click beetles (Coleoptera, Elateridae). Palaeontological Journal 4, 51–62. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dolin, V. G. 1976. Fossil click beetles (Coleoptera, Elateridae) of the subfamilies Negastriinae and Cardiophorinae from the Upper Jurassic Karatau. Vestnik Zoologiii 2, 68–75. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dolin, V. G. 1980. Click beetles (Coleoptera, Elateridae) from the Upper Jurassic Karatau. In Dolin, V. G., Panfilov, D. V., Ponomarenko, A. G. & Pritykina, L. N. Fossil insects of the Mesozoic, 17–81. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Dury, C. 1917. Synopsis of the coleopterous family Cisidae (Cioidae) of America north of Mexico. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History 22, 1–27.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1832. Genera Dytisceorum. Dissertatio inauguralis, Berlin: C. Hold, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1837. Die Käfer der Mark Brandenburg. Band 1. Berlin: F.H. Morin. 384 pp.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1840. Entomographien, Untersuchungen in dem Gebiete der Entomologie mit besonderer Benutzung der Königl. Sammlung in Berlin. Heft 1. Berlin: Morin. X+180 pp.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1842. Beitrag zur Insecten-Fauna von Vandiemensland, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der geographischen Verbreitung der Insecten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 8, 83–287, pls. 4–5.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1843. Versuch einer systematischen Einteilung der Nitidularien. Germar's Zeitschrift für die Entomologie 4, 225–361.Google Scholar
Erichson, W. F. 1847. Naturgeschichte der Insekten Deutschlands. Erste Abteilung, Coleoptera, Bd. 3. Berlin: Verlag der Nocolaischen Buchhandlung, 481–800.Google Scholar
Eschscholtz, F. 1829. Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Thierarten, während des Flottcapitains von Kotzebue's zweiter Reise um die Welt, auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië” in den Jahren 1823–1826. Erstes Heft. Berlin: G. Reimer, 1–17.Google Scholar
Everts, J. E. 1898. Coleoptera Neerlandica. De schildvleugelige Insecten van Nederland en het aangrenzend gebied. Deel 1, Eerste gedeelte. S'Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, viii, 360 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, objectis synonymys, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Korte Flensburgi et Lipsiae: Libraria Kortii, 1–832.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1781. Species Insectorum exhibentes eorum differentias specificas [etc.]. Vol. 1–2. Hamburgi et Killonii: C. E. Bohn, vii, 552 pp. + 517 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1792. Entomología systematica emendata et aucta, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Tomus I. Pars I. Hafniae: C. G. Proft, xx+1–330.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1794. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species objectis, synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Tomus IV. Hafniae: C. G. Proft, viii + 488 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1801 Systema Eleutheratorum, secundum ordines, genera, species. Kiliae: Bibliopolii Academici Novi, 1, i–xxiv + 1–506.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. 1886. Descriptions de Coléoptères de l'interieur de la Chine. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 6, 303–356.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. 1896. Matériaux pour la faune coléoptèrique de la région malgache. Annales de la Société entomologique de Belgique 40, 336–398.Google Scholar
Fairmaire, L. 1897. Description de Coléoptères nouveaux de la Malasie, de l'Inde et de la Chine. Notes from the Leyden Museum 19, 209–233.Google Scholar
Fallén, C. F. 1802. Observationes entomologiae, 1, Berling, Pars: Dissert. Lund, 1–20.Google Scholar
Fanti, F., Damgaard, A. L. & Ellenberger, S. 2018. Two new genera of Cantharidae from Burmese amber of the Hukawng Valley (Insecta, Coleoptera). Cretaceous Research 86, 170–177.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1821. Insecta. In Supplement to the fourth, fifth and sixth editions of the encyclopaedia Britannica, with preliminary dissertations on the history of the sciences, 5, 41–56. Edinburgh: A. Archibald Constable and Company.Google Scholar
Förster, B. 1891. Die Insekten des “Plattigen Steinmergels” von Brunstatt. Abhandlungen zur Geologischen Specialkarte von Elsass-Lothringen, Strasbourg 3, 333–594.Google Scholar
Franciscolo, M. E. 1997. Coleoptera Lucanidae. Fauna d'Italia 35, i–xi, 1–228.Google Scholar
Geinitz, F. E. 1894. Die Käferreste des Dobbertiner Lias. Archiv des Vereins der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in Mecklenburg, Guestrow 48, 71–78.Google Scholar
Germain, P. 1901. Apuntes Entomologicos. Tres Especies de Heloforidos Chilenos. Anales de la Universidad de Chile 109, 517–38, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Germar, E. F. 1818. VIII. Vermischte Bemerkungen über einige Käferarrten. Magazin für der Entomologie 3, 228–260.Google Scholar
Germar, E. F. 1824. Insectorum species novae aut minus cognitae, descriptionibus illustratae. Halle, Impensis J.C. Hendelii et Filii. xxiv + 624 pp. + 2 pls.Google Scholar
Gersdorf, E. 1976. Dritter Beitrag über Käfer (Coleoptera) aus dem Jungtertiär von Willershausen, Bl. Northeim 4226. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Hannover, (A) 36, 103–145.Google Scholar
Gistel, J. N. F. X. 1848. Faunula monacensis cantharologica. Isis. Encyclopädische Zeitschrift, vorzüglich für Naturgeschichte, vergleichende Anatomie und Physiologie (Leipzig), 1848, Umschlag. 3 pp.Google Scholar
Gistel, J. N. F. X. 1856. Die Mysterien der Europäischen Insectenwelt. Kempten: T. Dannheimer. 530 pp.Google Scholar
Goecke, H. 1943. Monographie der Schilfkäfer. 2. Die fossilen Funde und ihre Bestimmung. Nova Acta Leopoldina 12, 337–380.Google Scholar
Goecke, H. 1960. Donaciinen der oligocaenen Ablagerungen von Rott. 16. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Donaciinen (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Decheniana 112, 279–281.Google Scholar
Gorham, H. S. 1889. Descriptions of new species and of a new genus of Coleoptera of the family Telephoridae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London 1889, 96–111.Google Scholar
Goss, H. 1878. The insect fauna of the Recent and Tertiary periods, and the British and foreign formations of those periods in which insect remains have been detected. Proceedings of the Entomological Society on London 5, 282–343.Google Scholar
Gozis, M. P. des 1886. Recherche de l'espèce typique de quelques ancient genres. Rectification synonymiques et notes diverses. Montluçon: Imprimerie Herbin, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Gravenhorst, J. L. C. 1802. Coleoptera Microptera Brunsvicensia nec non exoticorum quotquot exstant in collectionibus entomologorum in genera familias et species distribuit. Brunsurgae: Carolus Reichard, i–xvi, 1–206.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D., Engel, M. & Nascimbene, P. 2002. Fossiliferous cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and palaeontological significance. American Museum Novitates 3361, 1–71, 44 figs, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Gromov, V. P., Dmitriev, V. Yu Zherikhin, V. V., Lebedev, E. L., Ponomarenko, A. G., Rasnitsyn, A. P. & Sukacheva, I. D. 1993. Cretaceous insects from Uljya-River Basin (West Okhotsk region). In Ponomarenko, A. G. (ed.) Mesozoic insects and ostracods of Asia, 5–60. Moscow: Nauka (Proceedings of the Palaeontological Institute RAS, vol. 252). (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Grouvelle, A. 1891. Clavicornes du Bengale occidental. Annales de la Société entomologique de Belgique 35, 237–238.Google Scholar
Grouvelle, A. 1896. Descriptions de Clavicornes d'Afrique et de Madagascar. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 65, 71–94.Google Scholar
Grouvelle, A. 1908. Coléoptères de la région indienne. Rhizodidae, Trogositidae, Nitidulidae, Colydiidae, Cucujidae. (1ère mémoire). Annales de la Société entomologique de France 77, 315–495.Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F. E. 1843. Sur une groupe naturel ou une petite tribu de Coleoptérès de la famille des Malacodermes. Revue de la Zoologie (Soc. Cuv.) 6, 193–194.Google Scholar
Guérin-Méneville, F. E. 1849. Species et Iconographie Générique des Animaux Articules ou représentation des genres avec leur description et celle de toutes les espèces de cette grande division du rêgne animal. I, Coléoptères, Paris: Livraison, 6, nos. 15, 33, 34.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1808. Insecta Suecica descripta. Classis I. Coleoptera sive Eleutherata. Scaris: Leverentz Vol. 1, xii, 752 pp.Google Scholar
Haupt, H. 1950. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) aus der Eozänen Braunkohle des Geiseltales. Geologica 6, 1–168, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Haupt, H. 1956. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der eozanen Arthropodenfauna des Gieseltales. Nova Acta Leopoldina 128, 1–90.Google Scholar
Hawkeswood, T. J., Makhan, D. & Turner, J. R. 2009. Atridius jacquelinae sp. nov., a new scavenger beetle from Baltic amber (Coleoptera: Latridiidae). Entomologische Zeitschrift 119, 108–110.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. 1998. A new species of the genus Donaciella from the Lower Pleistocene in Nagaoka City, Niigata Prefecture, Central Japan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae). Bulletin of Osaka Museum of Natural History 52, 37–47.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. 1999. Fossil donaciine beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae) from the Pleistocene around the Haruna Volcano Gunma Prefecture, Central Japan. Bulletin of Mizunami Fossil Museum 26, 149–162.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M. 2000. Late pliocene to early pleistocene donaciine fossils from Uonuma Formation (Part II): a new Donacia from Uonuma hills in Niigata Prefecture, Japan (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae). Bulletin of Osaka Museum of Natural History 54, 31–48.Google Scholar
Hayes, P. A. & Collinson, M. E. 2014. The flora of the Insect Limestone (latest Eocene) from the Isle of Wight, southern England. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104, 245–261.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1841. Fauna Coleopterorum Helvetica. Zürich: Turici, pars 1, fasc. 3, 361–652.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1847. Die Insektenfauna der Tertiargebilde von Oeningen und von Radoboj in Croatien. Erste Theil. Käfer. Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften (Leipzig) 8, 1–230, 8 pls.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1849. Die Insektenfauna der Tertiärgebilde von Œningen und von Radoboj in Croatien. Zweite Abtheilung: Heuschrecken, Florfliegen, Aderflügler, Schmetterlinge und Fliegen. Neue Denkschriften Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften 11, i–iv, 1–264.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1856. Über die fossilen Insecten von Aix in der Provence. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 1, 1–40.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1862. Beitrage zur Insectenfauna Oeningens. Coleoptera. Geodephagen, Hydrocanthariden, Gyriniden, Brachylytren, Clavicornen, Lamellicornen und Buprestiden. Natuurkundige Verhandelingen van de Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen te Haarlem 16, 1–90, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1865. Die Urwelt der Schweiz. Zürich: F. Schulthess Verlag, 289–496.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1870. Die miocene Flora and Fauna Spitzbergens. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 8, 1–98.Google Scholar
Herbst, J. F. W. 1792. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und ausländischen Insekten als eine Fortsetzung der von Büffonschen Naturgeschichte. Der Käfer, IV. Berlin: J. Pauli. viii + 197 pp. + 12 pls.Google Scholar
Herman, L. H. 1970. Phylogeny and reclassification of the genera of the rove-beetle subfamily Oxytelinae of the world (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 142, 343–454.Google Scholar
Heuss, K. 2008. Zur Taxonomie und Ökologie der Schlammkäfer des Baltischen Bernsteins mit einem Gattungsschlüssel und der Beschreibung einer neuen Art (Coleoptera: Scirtidae). Entomologische Zeitschrift 118, 131–134.Google Scholar
Heyden, C. H. G. von 1859. Fossile Insekten aus der rheinischen Braunkohle. Palaeontographica 8, 1–15.Google Scholar
Heyden, C. H. G. von & Heyden, L. von 1866. Käfer und Polypen aus der Braunkohle des Siebengebirges. Palaeontographica 15, 131–56, pls 22–24.Google Scholar
Hieke, F. & Pietrzeniuk, E. 1984. Die Bernstein-Käfer des Museums für Naturkunde, Berlin (Insecta, Coleoptera). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 60, 297–326.Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-C. 1981. Discovery of new early cretaceous insects from Xishan, Beijing. Memoirs of the Tianjin Institute of Geological and Mineralogical Research 4, 88–96. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-C. 1982. Mesozoic fossil insects of Jiuquan Basin in Gansu province. Beijing: Geological Publishing House. 187 pp. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-C. 1995. Fossil insects of the southern Ordos Basin. Acta Geologica Gansu 4, 1–13. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Hong, Y.-C. 2002. Atlas of amber insects of China. Henan: Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House. 394 pp. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Hope, F. W. 1837. The coleopterist's manual, containing the lamellicorn insects of linneus and fabricius. London: Bohn. 121 pp. + 3 pls.Google Scholar
Hope, F. W. 1840. The coleopterist's manual, part the third, containing various families, genera, and species, of beetles, recorded by Linneus and Fabricius. Also, descriptions of newly discovered and unpublished insects. London: J. C. Bridgewater, Bowdery & Kerby, [5] 191 pp., 3 pls. [Before 30 Sep 1840 (Journal and Proceedings of the Entomological Society in London 1840).]Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1879. Revision of Nitidulidae of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 7, 267–336, 3 pls..Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1880. Synopsis of the Dascillidae of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 8, 76–114.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. 1890. Fam. Eucnemidae. Plate 10. In Godman, F. D. and Salvin, O. (eds) Insecta. Coleoptera. serricornia, 210–57, III. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Part 1. 572 pp. London: R. H. Porter.Google Scholar
Hörnschemeyer, T. & Wedmann, S. 1994. Fossile Prachtkäfer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Buprestinae) aus dem Mitteleozän der Grube Messel bei Darmstadt. Teil 1. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 170, 85–136.Google Scholar
Houlbert, C. 1914. La loi de la taille et l'évolution des coléoptères. IXe Congrès International de Zoologie Tenu à Monaco du 25 au 30 mars 1913, 699–742.Google Scholar
Huang, D.-Y. & Zhang, H. 1997. Fossil Byrrhidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from the early cretaceous of Western Beijing. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Sciences) 33, 562–569.Google Scholar
Iablokoff-Khnzoryan, S. M. 1961. Representatives of the family Helodidae (Coleoptera) from Baltic amber. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 1, 108–116. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Iablokoff-Khnzoryan, S. M. 1962. Representatives of the Sternoxia (Coleoptera) from Baltic amber. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 3, 81–89. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Illiger, J. C. W. 1798. Verzeichniss der Käfer Preussens, entworfen von J.G. Kugelann. Halle: J. J. Gebauer. 510 pp.Google Scholar
Illiger, J. C. W. 1807. Magazin für Insektenkunde. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 6, 1–370.Google Scholar
Ivie, M. A. 2002. Ptilodactylidae. In Arnett, R. H., Thomas, M. C., Skelley, P. E. & Frank, J. H. (eds) American beetles. Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea, Vol. 2, 135–138. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, DC: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Jäch, M. 1994. Description of Gondraena gen. n. from South India and Madagascar and Davidraena gen. n. from South India (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Koleopterogische Rundschau 64, 85–102.Google Scholar
Jäch, M. A. & Yamamoto, S. 2017. Systematic palaeontology, in Discovery of the first hydraenid beetle in amber, with description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Staphylinoidea: Hydraenidae). Cretaceous Research 78, 27–33.Google Scholar
Jacoby, M. 1885. Descriptions of the phytophagous Coleoptera of Japan, obtained by Mr. George Lewis during his second Journey, from February 1880 to September 1881. Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 190–211, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P. N. C. 1857. Manuel Entomologique. Genera des coléoptères d'Europe… Tome Deuxième. Paris: Deyrolle. cclxxvi + 133 pp. + 67 pls.Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P. N. C. 1858. Manuel Entomologique. Genera des coléoptères d'Europe… Tome Deuxième. Paris: Deyrolle, 134–285.Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P. N. C. 1863. Genera des Coleoptérès d'Europe comprenant leur classification en Famillen Naturelles, 3, 353–464. Paris: A. Deyrolle.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. L. & Ratcliffe, B. C. 2002. Series Scarabaeiformia Crowson 1960 (=Lamellicornia), Superfamily Scarabaeoidea Latreille 1802, Introduction. In Arnett, R. H., Thomas, M. C., Skelley, P. E. & Frank, J. H. (eds) American beetles. Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea, Vol. 2, 1–5. Boca Raton: CRC Press. xiv + 861 pp.Google Scholar
Janssens, E. 1972. Description d'un genre nouveua et de plusieurs espèces nouvelles d'Hydraenidae d'Afrique Orientale (Coleoptera). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines 86, 385–395.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1976. Report of Easter field meeting: the lower tertiaries of the Isle of Wight, 27–31.III.1975. Tertiary Research 1, 11–16.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1980. Fossil insects from the Bembridge Marls, Palaeogene of the Isle of Wight, Southern England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series 33, 237–293.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1990. A boring beetle from the Wealden of the Weald. In Boucot, A. J. (ed.) Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution, 373–379. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jelínek, J. 1999. Contribution to taxonomy of the beetle subfamily Nitidulinae (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). Folia Heyrovskyana 7, 251–281.Google Scholar
Kazantsev, S. V. 2010. New Malthodes (Insecta: Cantharidae: Coleoptera) from the Rovno Amber (Upper Eocene of Ukraine). Russian Entomological Journal 19, 105–107.Google Scholar
Kazantsev, S. V. 2013. New taxa of Baltic amber soldier beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Cantharidae) with synonymic and taxonomic notes. Russian Entomological Journal 22, 283–291.Google Scholar
Kazantsev, S. V. 2015. Protoluciola albertalleni gen.n., sp.n., a new Luciolinae firefly (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lampyridae) from Burmite amber. Russian Entomological Journal 24, 281–283.Google Scholar
Kiesenwetter, H. von 1858. Naturgeschichte der Insekten Deutschlands, begonnen von Dr. W.F. Erichson (1 Coleoptera) 4. 745 pp.Google Scholar
Kirby, W. 1837. The insects. In Richardson, J. (ed.) Fauna boreali-Americana, or the zoology of the northern parts of british america: containing descriptions of the objects of natural history collected on the late northern land expedition, under command of Captain Sir John Franklin, R.N. Norwich: J. Fletcher.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 1986a. Analysis of structure of the genitalia for reconstruction of phylogenesis and argumentation to the system of the family of sap-beetles (Nitidulidae, Coleoptera). Proceedings of the All-Union Entomological Society 68, 22–28. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 1986b. On polyphyly of the Carpophilinae with description of a new subfamily, Cillaeinae (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae). Coleopterists Bulletin 40, 217–221.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 1994. Sistema, evolutzia obraza zhisni i filogeniya otryada Zhukov (Coleoptera). I [System, evolution of the mode of life and phylogeny of the order Coleoptera. I]. Entomologicheskoye Obozrenie 73, 266–288. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 1998. Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) of the Himalayas and Northern Indochina. Part 1: subfamily Epuraeinae. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books (Theses Zoologicae, Vol. 28). 489 pp.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2003. Four new genera of the Soronia complex (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) from Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and tropical America with notes on composition of the complex and description of new species from Southern Hemisphere. Russian Entomological Journal 12, 1–18.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2005a. A revision of the genus Cupes Fabricius, 1801 from Baltic amber and some notes on taxonomy and composition of the family Cupedidae (Coleoptera, Archostemata). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut an der Universität Hamburg 89, 55–84.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2005b. On the similarities between the Nitidulid faunas from Baltic amber and the Himalayas and mountains of South China (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae). In 2nd International symposium on “Biodiversity and Natural Heritage of the Himalaya”, Erfurt, 8–11 April 2005. Abstracts. Naturhistorisches Museum in Erfurt. http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/pdf/kirejtshuk_2005_himal.pdf.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2011. The oldest representatives of the subfamilies Meligethinae (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) and Brontinae (Coleoptera, Silvanidae) from Baltic amber and some evolutionary notes. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 80, 499–515.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Azar, D., Beaver, R. A., Mandelstam, M. Yu. & Nel, A. 2009a. The most ancient bark beetle known: a new tribe, genus and species from Lebanese amber (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Systematic Entomology 34, 101–112.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Azar, D., Tafforeau, P., Boistel, R. & Fernandez, V. 2009b. New beetles of Polyphaga (Coleoptera, Polyphaga) from Lebanese amber. Denisia 26 (zugleich Kataloge der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen, n.s. 86), 119–130.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Nel, A. & Colomb, F. M. 2010a. New Archostemata (Insecta, Coleoptera) from the French Paleocene and Early Eocene, with a note on the composition of the suborder. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 46, 216–227.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Ponomarenko, A. G., Prokin, A. A., Chang, H., Nikolajev, G. V. & Ren, D. 2010b. Current knowledge on Mesozoic Coleoptera from Daohugou and Liaoning (North East China). Acta Geologica Sinica 84, 783–792.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Moseyko, A. G. & Ren, D. 2015. Mesozoic leaf beetles of the tribe Mesolpinini trib. nov. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) from the Lower Cretaceous. Paleontological Journal 49, 1424–1435.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G., Nel, A. & Kirejtshuk, P. A. 2016. Taxonomy of the reticulate beetles of the subfamily Cupedinae (Coleoptera, Archostemata), with a review of the historical development. Invertebrate Zoology 13, 61–190.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Azar, D. 2008. New species, genera and family of Coleoptera (Insecta) from Lebanese amber with evolutionary and systematic comments. Alavesia 2, 15–46.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Azar, D. 2013. Current knowledge of Coleoptera (Insecta) from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber and taxonomical notes for some Mesozoic groups. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 6, 103–134.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Chetverikov, Ph. E. 2018. Discovery of a Nitidulidae in Cretaceous Burmese amber (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea) with description of a new genus and taxonomic notes. Cretaceous Research 89, 174–182.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Kurochkin, A. S. 2010. New beetles of sap beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Nitidulini) from the Baltic and Bitterfeld amber. Paleontological Journal 44, 53–67.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Kvamme, T. 2002. Revision of the subgenus Lasiodites Jelínek, 1999, stat. nov. of the genus Phenolia Erichson, 1843 from Africa and Madagascar (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae). Zoologische Reihe ( Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde Berlin) 78, 3–70.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Lawrence, J. F. 1992. Cychramptodini, new tribe of the Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) from Australia. Journal of the Australian entomological Society 31, 29–46.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2008. New beetles of the suborder Polyphaga from the Lowermost Eocene French amber (Insecta: Coleoptera). Annales de la Société entomologique de France 44, 419–442.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2013. Current knowledge of Coleoptera (Insecta) from the Lowermost Eocene Oise amber. Insect Systematics & Evolution 44, 175–201.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2016. Lidryopinae, new byrrhid subfamily from the Lower Cretaceous of France (Coleoptera, Byrrhidae). Cretaceous Research 67, 140–147.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2018. Nitidulidae (Coleoptera) from the Paleocene of Menat (France). Zootaxa 4402, 1–41.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Pakaluk, J. 1996. Notes on the Nearctic Epuraeinae (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae). Zoosystematica Rossica 4, 139–152.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Poinar, G. 2007. Species of two extinct genera of sap beetles of the tribe Nitidulini (Nitidulidae: Coleoptera) in Baltic and Dominican amber. Paleontological Journal 41, 629–641.Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Ponomarenko, A. G. 1990. Fossil beetles of the families Peltidae and Nitidulidae (Coleoptera). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 26, 78–88. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Ponomarenko, A. G. 2018. Catalogue of fossil Coleoptera. http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/eng/paleosys.htm.Google Scholar
Klausnitzer, B. 1976. Neue Arten der Gattung Helodes Latreille aus Bernstein (Coleoptera, Helodidae). 31. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Helodidae. Reichenbachia 16, 53–61.Google Scholar
Klausnitzer, B. 2004. Neue Arten der Familie Scirtidae (Coleoptera) aus Baltischem Bernstein (Teil 1). Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 48, 99–103.Google Scholar
Klausnitzer, B. 2011. Neue Arten der Familie Scirtidae (Coleoptera) aus Baltischem Bernstein (Teil 2). Entomologische Zeitschrift 121, 11–14.Google Scholar
Klebs, R. 1910. Über Bernsteineinschlüsse im allgemeinen und die Coleopteren meiner Bernsteinsammlung. Schriften der Physikalisch-Ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg 51, 217–242.Google Scholar
Kolbe, H. J. 1897. Coleoptera (Käfer und Netzflügler). Deutsch-Ost-Afrika. Berlin: Verlag Dietrich Reimer. 368 pp + 3 pls.Google Scholar
Kolbe, H. J. 1908. Mein System der Coleopteren. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Insektenbiologie 4, 16–123, 153–62, 219–26, 246–51, 286–94, 389–400.Google Scholar
Kovac, D., Jelínek, J., Hashim, R. & Wiwatwitaya, D. 2007. Transition from bamboo sap to water: aquatic habits in the sap beetle Amphicrossus japonicus (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea: Nitidulidae). European Journal of Entomology 104, 635–638.Google Scholar
Kovalev, A.V., Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2012. New species of the genus Trixagus Kugelann, 1794 (Coleoptera: Throscidae) from the Lowermost Eocene amber of Oise (France). Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 316, 83–88.Google Scholar
Kovalev, A. V., Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Azar, D. 2013. The oldest representatives of the family Throscidae (Coleoptera: Elateriformia) from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber. Cretaceous Research 44, 157–65Google Scholar
Krell, F.-T. 2000. The fossil record of Mesozoic and tertiary Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Invertebrate Taxonomy 14, 871–905.Google Scholar
Krell, F.-T. 2006. Fossil record and evolution of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Coleopterists Society Monograph 5, 120–143.Google Scholar
Krell, F.-T. 2007. Catalogue of fossil Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga) of the Mesozoic and Tertiary – Version 2007. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Technical Report 2007, 1–79.Google Scholar
Kubisz, D. 2000. Fossil beetles (Coleoptera) from Baltic amber in the collection of the Museum of Natural History of ISEA in Krakow. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 69, 225–230.Google Scholar
Kubisz, D. 2001. Beetles in the collection of the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdansk, with description of Colotes sambicus sp. n. (Coleoptera: Melyridae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 70, 259–265.Google Scholar
Kugelann, J. G. 1794. Verzeichniss der in einigen Gegenden Preussens bis jetzt entdeckten Käfer-Arten, nebst kurzen Nachrichten von denselben. Neuestes Magazin für die Liebhaber der Entomologie, herausgegeben von D. H. Schneider 1, 513–582.Google Scholar
Kugelann, J. G. 1798. In Verzeichniss der Käfer Preussens. Halle: Johann Jacob Gebauer. xiii + 510 pp.Google Scholar
Kurochkin, A. S. & Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2010. New species of sap beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Epuraeinae, Cybocephalinae) from the Baltic amber. Paleontological Journal 44, 534–545.Google Scholar
Kuška, A. 1992. Three new species of beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae, Anobiidae, Curculionidae) from the Baltic amber. Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum 3, 107–113.Google Scholar
Kuška, A. 1996. New beetle species (Coleoptera, Cantharidae, Curculionidae) from the Baltic amber. Prace Muzeum Ziemi 44, 13–23.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1854. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des Coléoptères. Vol. 1. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret. 486 pp.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1857. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des Coléoptères. Vol. 4. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret. 579 pp.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1859. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des Coléoptères. Vol. 5. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret. 750 pp.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, J. T. 1866. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des Coléoptères. Vol. 7. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret. 620 pp.Google Scholar
LaFerté-Sénectère, M. F. 1842. Notice sur les Anthicus requeillis aux environs de Perpignan et description de quelques especes nouvelles. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 11, 247–260.Google Scholar
LaFerté-Sénectère, M. F. 1849. Monographie des Anthicus et genre voisins. Paris: Sapia. 340 pp. + 16 pls.Google Scholar
Lameere, A. 1900. Notes pour la classification des Coléoptères. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 44, 355–377.Google Scholar
Lameere, A. 1938. Évolution des Coléoptères. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 78, 355–362.Google Scholar
Laporte, F. L. N. de Caumont de (Compte de Castelnau). 1832. Mémoire sur cinquante espèces nouvelles ou peu connues d'insectes. Annals de la Société entomologique de France 15, 67–87.Google Scholar
Laporte, F. L. N. de Caumont de (Compte de Castelnau). 1833. Essais d'une revision du genre Lampyre. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 2, 122–153.Google Scholar
Laporte, F. L. N. de Caumont de (Compte de Castelnau). 1835. Études entomologique, ou description d'insectes nouveaux, et observations sur la synonymie. Premièr partie. Paris: Méquignon-Marvis Père et Fils.Google Scholar
Laporte, F. L. N. de Caumont de (Compte de Castelnau). 1836. Études entomologique, ou descriptions d'insectes nouveaux et observations sur la synonymie. Revue entomologique 4, 5–60.Google Scholar
Laporte, F. L. N. de Caumont de (Compte de Castelnau). 1840. Histoire naturelle des insectes coléoptères; avec une introduction renfermant l'anatomie et la physiologie des animaux articulés. Paris: P. Duménil.Google Scholar
Larsson, S. G. 1978. Baltic amber – a palaeobiological study. Entomonograph, 1. Klampenborg: Scandinavian Science Press Ltd., 192 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes. Familles naturelles des genres. Vol. 3. F. Paris: Dufart. 387 pp., pls. 16–37.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1804. Tableau Méthodique des Insectes. In Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle… Vol. 24. Tableau méthodique d'histoire naturelle, 129–200. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1807. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurims explicata. Tomus 3. Paris: A. Koenig. 258 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1809. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurims explicata. Tomus 4. Paris: A. Koenig. 399 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Les crustacés, les arachnides et les insectes. In Cuvie, G. (ed.) Le règne animal distribué d'après son Organization… Vol. 3. Paris: Deterville. xxix + 653 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1819. Trachélides. In Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle… (nouvelle édition). Vol. 34, 362–364. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Lea, A. M. 1910. On some Tasmanian cave-inhabiting beetles. Tasmanian Naturalist 2, 53–58.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1815. Entomology. Edinburgh Encyclopedia 9, 57–172.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1817. The zoological miscellany, being descriptions of new or interesting animals, 3. London: R. P. Nodder. v + 151 pp.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1819. New genera. In G. Samouelle. The Entomologist's useful compendium; or an introduction to the knowledge of British insects, comprising the best means of obtaining and preserving them, and a description of the apparatus generally used; together with the genera of Linné, and the modern method of arranging of the classes Crustacea, Myriapoda, spiders, mites, and insects from their affinities and structure, according to the views of Dr. Leach. Also an explanation of the terms used in entomology; a calendar of the times of appearance, and usual situations of near 3000 species of British insects; with instructions for collecting and fitting up objects for the microscope. London: Thomas Boys, 496 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1852. Remarks upon the Coccinellidae of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 6, 129–145.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1861. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Prepared for Smithsonian Institution. Part 1. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 3, i–xxv, 1–208.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1862. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Prepared for Smithsonian Institution. Part 1 (cont.). Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 3, 209–286.Google Scholar
LeConte, J. L. 1881. Synopsis of the Lampyridae of the United States. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 9, 15–72.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, F., Vincent, B., Azar, D. & Nel, A. 2005. The oldest beetle of the Euaesthetinae (Staphylinidae) from early Cretaceous Lebanese amber. Cretaceous Research 26, 207–211.Google Scholar
Lesne, P. 1920. Quelques insectes du Pliocène supérieur du Comté de Durham. Bulletin du Museum National d'History Naturelle, Paris, 388–394, 484–488, 626.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae. 1. regnum animale, 1. 10th edn. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii. 824 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1760. Fauna suecica sistens animalia Sueciae regni: Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa per classes et ordines, genera et species… Editio alterna, auctior. Stockholm: Laureniae, Salvii, il. 578 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica sistens Animalia Sueciae Regni: Mammalia, Aves. Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa per classes et ordines, genera et species, cum differentiis specierum, synonymis auctorum, nominibus incolarum, locis natalium, descriptionibus Insectorum. Editio altera, auctior. Stockholm: Laureniae, Salvii. xxxxviii + 578 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1766. Systema naturae siva regna tria naturae systematice proforta per classes, ordines, genera et species. 1. Holmiae, Laureniae Salvii, 1, 532 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1767. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus… Holmiae, Laurentii Salvii, 1, 533–1327.Google Scholar
Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. (eds) 2006. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, 3. Stenstrup: Apollo Books. 690 pp.Google Scholar
Lü, L., Cai, C. & Huang, D. 2017. The earliest oxyteline rove beetle in amber and its systematic implications (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae). Cretaceous Research 69, 169–177.Google Scholar
Lyubarsky, G. Yu. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2010. First Eocene species of the genus Micrambe (Cryptophagidae: Coleoptera, Clavicornia). Vestnik zoologii 44, 275–279.Google Scholar
Lyubarsky, G. Yu. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2012. First Eocene species of the genus Micrambe (Cryptophagidae: Coleoptera, Clavicornia). Vestnik Zoologii 46, 30–36.Google Scholar
Macleay, W. S. 1819. Horæ entomologicæ: or essays on the annulose animals, vol. 1, part 1. London: Bagster. 364 pp.Google Scholar
Macleay, W. S. 1825. Annulosa Javanica, an attempt to illustrate the natural affinities and analogies of the insects collected in Java by ThomasHorsfield, M.D.F.L. & G.S. and deposited by him in the Museum of the Honourable East-India Company. No. 1. London: Kingsbury, Parbury, and Allen. xii + 50 pp. + 1 pl.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C. G. von 1831. Précis d'un nouvel arrangement de la famille des brachélytres de l'ordre des insectes coléoptères. Memoires présentés à L'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersburg 1, 415–501.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. V. Jr. 1974. A preliminary list of insect fossils from the Beaufort Formation, Meighen Island, District of Franklin. Papers of the Geological Survey of Canada, A. 74–01, 203–206.Google Scholar
Mayer, C., Soka, G. & Picker, M. 2006. The importance of monkey beetle (Scarabaeidae: Hopliini) pollination for Aizoaceae and Asteraceae in grazed and ungrazed areas at Paulshoek, Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Insect Conservation 10, 323–333.Google Scholar
McCobb, L. M. E., Duncan, I. J., Jarzembowski, E. A., Stankievicz, B. A., Wills, M. A. & Briggs, D. E. G. 1998. Taphonomy of the insects from the Insect Bed (Bembridge Marls), late Eocene, Isle of Wight, England. Geological Magazine 135, 553–563.Google Scholar
Mellié, J. 1847. Melangés et nouvelles. Revue de la Zoologie de la Société Cuvieriènne 10, 108–110.Google Scholar
Micó, E. & Galante, E. 2002. Atlas fotográfico de los escarabeidos florícolas íbero-baleares. Barcelona: Argania Editio. 81 pp.Google Scholar
Mizunuma, T. & Nagai, S. 1994. The lucanid beetles of the World. Tokyo: Mushi-Sha. 337 pp.Google Scholar
Moseyko, A. G., Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Nel, A. 2010. New genera and new species of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Polyphaga: Chrysomelidae) from Lowermost Eocene French amber. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 46, 116–123.Google Scholar
Moseyko, A. G. & Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2013. On the taxonomic position of new taxa of the subfamily Eumolpinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) from Baltic amber. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 6, 163–172.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. von 1856. Études Entomologiques. Helsinki: Imprimerie de la Sociètè Litérature Finnoise, 5, 21–38.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. von 1857. Insects du Japan. Études Entomologiques. Helsinki: Imprimerie de la Sociètè Litérature Finnoise, 6, 25–41.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. von 1863. Essai d'un Catalogue des Insectes d' île de Ceylon. Bulletin de la Sociètè impériale des naturalists de Moscou 34, 421–532; 36, 436–443.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. von 1865. Enumeration des nouvelles espèces de Coléoptères rapportès de ses voyages. Bulletin de la Sociètè impériale des naturalists de Moscou 38, 227–313.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. 1844. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Palpicornes. Paris: Maison. vii + 196 pp. + pl.1.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. & Rey, C. 1866. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Tribu des Colligeres. Annales de la Société linnèene de Lyon 13, 18–282.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. & Rey, C. 1869. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Piluliformes. Paris: Deyrolle. 175 pp. + 2 pls.Google Scholar
Münster, T. 1902. Die norwegischen Arten den Familie Byrrhidae (Cistelidae Reitter), nebst Beschreibung eines neuen Genus und zweier Arten. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 52, 87–91.Google Scholar
Muona, J. 1993. Eucnemidae and Throscidae from Baltic amber (Coleoptera). Entomologische Blätter 89, 15–45.Google Scholar
Murray, A. 1864. Monograph of the family Nitidulariae. Part 1. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 24, 211–439.Google Scholar
Nabozhenko, M. V. & Kirejtshuk, A. G. 2013. New genus and species of the tribe Helopini (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from Palaeocene of Menat (France). Comptes Rendus Palevol 13(2014), 65–71.Google Scholar
Nabozhenko, M. & Kirejtshuk, A. 2017. The oldest opatrine terrestrial darkling beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Tenebrioninae) from the Paleocene of Menat (France). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 91, 307–313.Google Scholar
Nadein, K. S. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2010. New taxa of Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Rovno amber, Late Eocene. Acta Geologica Sinica 84, 772–782.Google Scholar
Newton, A. 1982. A new genus and species of Oxytelinae from Australia, with description of its larva, systematic position, and phylogenetic relationships (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). American Museum Novitates 2744, 1–24.Google Scholar
Newton, A., Thayer, M. K., Ashe, J. S. & Cchandler, D. S. 2000. Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802. In Arnett, R. H. Jr. & Thomas, M. C. (eds) American beetles, 272–418, Vol. 1. Archostemata, Myxophaga, Adephaga, Polyphaga: Staphyliniformia. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Nikolajev, G. V. 2007. The Mesozoic stage of evolution of the scarabaeoid beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Almaty: Kazakh University. 222 pp. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. N. 2001. Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). World Catalogue of Insects. Vol. 3. Stenstrup: Apollo Books. 395 pp.Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. von 1837. Symbolae ad monographiam staphylinorum. Ex Academiae Scientiarum. Petropoli, 167 pp.Google Scholar
Oke, C. G. 1957. Fossil insecta from Cainozoic resin at Allendale, Victoria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 69, 29–31.Google Scholar
Orchymont, A. d' 1942. Revision du sous-genre Homalochthebius Kuwert, 1887 du genre Ochthebius Leach (Coleoptera Hydraenidae). Bulletin du Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de Belgique 18, 1–16.Google Scholar
Orchymont, A. d' 1948. Mission scientifique de l'Omo, tome VII. Fascicule 62. Coleoptera: XV. Hydraenidae. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histroire naturelle, Paris (N.S.) 27, 29–62, pl. III–IV.Google Scholar
Oustalet, J. F. E. 1874. Recherches sur les insectes fossiles des terraines tertiaires de la France. Insectes fossiles d'Aix en Provence. Annales des Sciences Géologiques Paris 5, 1–381.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R., Carvalho, J. C. M., Cook, D. R., O'Neill, K., Petrunkevitch, A. & Sailer, R. I. 1957. Miocene arthropods from the Mojave Desert, California. United States Geological Survey, Professional Papers , 237–280.Google Scholar
Pan, X., Chang, H., Ren, D. & Shih, C. 2011. The first fossil buprestids from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation of China (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Zootaxa 2745, 53–62.Google Scholar
Panzer, G. W. F. 1799. Fauna insectorum germanicae initia oder Deutschlands Insekten. 2nd edn. Nürnberg: Felsecker 16, 1–24.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. T. 1943. A revision of Nearctic Nitidulidae (Coleoptera). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at Harvard College 92, 119–278, 13 pls.Google Scholar
Pascoe, F. P. 1875. Descriptions of new genera and species of New Zealand. Part 1. Annals & Magazine of natural History 16, 210–223.Google Scholar
Paśnik, G. 2005. Fossils of Staphylinidae from Baltic amber: a new genus and three new species (Insecta, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 85, 97–100.Google Scholar
Paśnik, G. & Kubisz, D. 2002. A new genus and new species of Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) from Baltic amber. European Journal of Entomology 99, 353–361.Google Scholar
Paykull, G. von 1798. Insecta. Coleoptera. Fauna Svecica, Vol. 1, 1–358. Upsaliae, J. F. Edman.Google Scholar
Peris, D., Chatzimanolis, S. & Declós, X. 2014. Diversity of rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in Early Cretaceous Spanish amber. Cretaceous Research 48, 85–95.Google Scholar
Peris, D., Lyubarsky, G. Y. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2017. A new genus of silken-fungus beetle (Coleoptera: Cryptophagidae) from the Spanish Cretaceous amber. Cretaceous Research 78, 191–195.Google Scholar
Perkins, P. D. 1979. New names for two species of aquatic beetles from Australia and China (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Coleopterists Bulletin 33, 336.Google Scholar
Perkins, P. D. 1997. Life on the effective bubble: exocrine secretion delivery systems (ESDS) and the evolution and classification of beetles in the family Hydraenidae. Annals of Carnegie Museum 66, 89–207.Google Scholar
Perkins, P. D. 2018. A new genus and new species of Meropathina from Lord Howe Island (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Zootaxa 4444, 409–420.Google Scholar
Pic, M. 1913. Coléoptères exotique en partie nouveaux (suite). L'Echange, Revue Linnéenne, Moulins 29, 163–166.Google Scholar
Piton, L. 1939. Note complémentaire sur les insectes fossiles des cinerites pliocènes du Lac Chambon (Puy-de-Dome). Revue des Sciences Naturelles d'Auvergne N.S. 5, 102–108.Google Scholar
Piton, L. 1940. Paleontologie du Grisement Éocène de Menat (Puy-de-Dome) Flore et Faune. Mémoire de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand 1, 1–303.Google Scholar
Platt, N. H. & Weight, V. P. 1992. Palustrine carbonates and the Florida Everglades: towards an exposure index for the fresh-water environment. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62, 1058–1071.Google Scholar
Pongracz, A. 1935. Die eozäne Insektenfauna des Geiseltales. Nova Acta Leopoldina, Halle, N.F. 2, 438–572.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1966. Beetles of the family Cupedidae from the Lower Triassic of Middle Asia. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 4, 47–68. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1969. Historical development of the Coleoptera – Archostemata. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 125 (Proceedings of Palaeontological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 125) Moscow: Nauka. 240 pp. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1973. Erster Fund eines Cupediden im Neogen Europas (Coleoptera: Cupedidae). Věstnik Československé společnosti zoologické, Praha 37, 101–103.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1977. Infraorder Staphyliniformia. Zherikhin, V. V. 1977. Infraorder Cucujiformia. Family Acanthocnemidae. Family Lathridiidae. In Arnoldi, L. V., Zherikhin, V. V., Nikritin, L. M. & Ponomarenko, A. G. Mesozoic beetles (Proceedings of Palaeontological Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 161), 106–119. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1985a. Beetles from the Jurassic of Siberia and Western Mongolia. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. (ed.) Jurassic insects of Siberia and Mongolia (Proceedings of the Palaeontological Institute of USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 211), 47–87. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1985b. Fossil insects from the thithonian “Solnhofener Plattenkalke” in the Museum of Natural History, Vienna. Annales des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien, (A) 87, 135–144.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1987. New Mesozoic water beetles. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal 2, 83–97. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 1990. Beetles Scarabaeida. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. (ed.) Late Mesozoic insects of East Transbaikalia (Proceedings of the Palaeontological Institute of USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 239), 39–87. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 2006. On the types of Mesozoic archostematan beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera, Archostemata) in the Natural History Museum, London. Paleontological Journal 40, 90–99. (In Russian: 86–94.)Google Scholar
Prokin, A. A. & Ponomarenko, A. G. 2013. Paleontological data on the evolution of water beetles (Coleoptera). In Prokin, A. A., Petrov, P. N., Zhavoronkova, O. D. & Tuzovskij, P. V. (eds) Hydroentomology in Russia and adjacent countries: materials of the Fifth all-Russia symposium on amphibiotic and aquatic insects. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125–134. Yaroslavl: Filigran. 254 pp. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Puthz, V. 2006. Die erste Euaesthetine aus dem Baltischen Bernstein (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). 90. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Euaesthetinen. Entomologische Blätter 101, 127–128.Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P. & Ross, A. J. 2000. A preliminary list of arthropod families present in the Burmese amber collection at the Natural History Museum, London. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, Geological Series 56, 21–24.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, B. C., Smith, D. M. & Erwin, D. 2005. Oryctoantiquus borealis, new genus and species from the Eocene of Oregon, U.S.A., the world's oldest fossil dynastine and largest fossil scarabaeid (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae). Coleopterists Bulletin 59, 127–135.Google Scholar
Rayner, R. J. & Waters, S. B. 1991. Floral sex and the fossil insect. Naturwissenschaften 78, 280–282.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1858. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer, nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Fauna Austriaca. 2nd edn. Wien: Gerold's Sohn. 1017 pp.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1873. Systematische Einteilung der Nitidularien. Vehandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 12, 5–194.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1877. Beiträge zur Käferfauna von Japan (Drittes Stück). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 21, 369–383.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1880. Bestimmungs-Tabellen der europäischen Coleopteren. III. Enthaltend die Familien Scaphidiidae, Lathridiidae und Dermestidae. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 30, 41–94.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1884a. Diagnosen neuer Coleoptern aus Lenkoran. Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 22, 430–445.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1884b. Die Nitiduliden Japans. Wiener entomologische Zeitung 3, 257–72, 299–302.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1920. Bestimmungs-Tabelle der europäischen Donaciini mit Berücksichtigung der Arten aus der paläarktischen Region. Wiener entomologische Zeitung 38, 21–43.Google Scholar
Rieke, H.-P. 2012. Neue Arten und Anmerkungen zu Latridiidae (Coleoptera) aus Baltischem Bernstein. Latridiidae 9, 7–23.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. 2014. The fauna and flora of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, UK: preface. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104, 231.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. & Self, A. 2014. The fauna and flora of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, UK: introduction, history and geology. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104, 232–244.Google Scholar
Ryvkin, A. B. 1985. Beetles of the family Staphylinidae from the Jurassic of Transbaikal. pp. 88–91. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. (ed.). Jurassic insects of Siberia and Mongolia (Proceedings of the Palaeontological Institute of USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 211). Moscow: Nauka. 192 pp. + 18 pls. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ryvkin, A. B. 1990. Family Staphylinidae Latreille, 1802. In Rasnitsyn, A. P. (ed.) Late Mesozoic insects of Eastern Transbaikalia (Proceedings of the Palaeontological Institute of USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 239), 52–66. Moscow: Nauka. 222 pp. + 16 pls. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Sachse, J. C. R. 1852. Neue Käfer. Entomologische Zeitung (Stettin) 13, 115–27, 142–49, 454.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. 1900. Coleoptera mediterranea et rossoasiatica nova vel minus cognita itineribus annis 1895–1896 et 1898–1899 collecta. Öfversigt av Finska Vetenskabs Societetens Förhandlingar 42, 174–208.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, R. F. 1847. Coleoptera diebus XV-XXVII Decembris MDCCCXXXIX ad Rio Janeiro lecta. (Continuatio). Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 2, 787–805.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. 1819. The entomologist's useful compendium, or an introduction to the knowlwdge of British insects. London: Thomas Boys. 496 pp. + 12 pls.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1825. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the United States. Journal of the Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia 5, 160–204.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1826. Descriptions of new species of Coleopterous Insects inhabiting the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences 5, 237–284.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1909. New Coleoptera chiefly from Arizona. The Museum of the Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences, Science Bulletin 1, 375–386.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1919. Synoptical and other notes on some species of the family Chrysomelidae and descriptions of new species. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 27, 307–340.Google Scholar
Schaller, J. G. 1783. Neue Insekten. Abhandlungen der Hallischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 1, 217–332.Google Scholar
Schaufuss, C. 1892. Preussens Bernstein-Käfer. I. Neue Formen aus der Helm'schen Sammlung im Danziger Provinzialmuseum. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift (1891) 36, 53–64.Google Scholar
Schawaller, W. 1986. Fossile Käfer aus miozaenen Sedimenten des Randecker Maars in Südwest-Deutschland (Insecta: Coleoptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (B) 126, 1–9.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1974. Coleoptera: Staphylinidae. In Hanström, B. P. B., Brink, P. & Rudebeck, G. (eds) South African animal life. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council, 15, 43–394.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. R., 1806. Helvetische Entomologie, oder Verzeichniss der Schweizerischen Insekten nach einer neuen Methode geordnet, mit Beschreibungen und Abbildungen. Zürich: Zweiter Teil. Orell, Füssli and Co. xiii + 248 pp. + 32 pls. [French translation by J. P. de Clairville.]Google Scholar
Schlechtendal, D. von 1894. Beiträge zur Kenntnis fossilen Insekten aus dem Braunkohlengebirge von Rott im Siebengebirge. Abhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Halle 20, 197–228, pls XII–IV.Google Scholar
Schöberlin, E. 1888. Der Oeninger Stinkschiefer und seine Insektenreste. Societas Entomologica, Zürich-Hottingen 3, 42, 51, 61, 68–69.Google Scholar
Scholtz, C. H. 1990. Phylogenetic trends in the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera). Journal of Natural History 24, 1027–1066.Google Scholar
Schönherr, C. J. 1823. Curculionides. Tabula synoptica familiae curculionidum, Isis von Oken 1823, 1132–1146.Google Scholar
Schönherr, C. J. 1826. Curculionidum Dispositio Methodica, cum Generum Characteribus, Descriptionibus atque Observationibus, seu Prodromus ad Synonymiae Insectorum, Partem. IV. Lipsiae: Fleischer, x + 338 pp.Google Scholar
Schülke, M. 2000. Eine neue Art der Gattung Bolitobius Leach in Samouelle aus dem Baltischen Bernstein (Col., Staphylinidae, Tachyporinae). Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 44, 101–103.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1876. Fossil Coleoptera from the Rocky Mountain Tertiaries. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 2, 77–87.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1878. The fossil insects of the Green River Shales. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 4, 747–776.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1890. The fossil insects of North America (with notes on some European species). 1. The Pretertiary insects. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories 13, 1–734.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1900a. Canadian fossil insects. 4. Additions to the Coleopterous fauna of the interglacial clays of the Toronto district. With an Appendix by A. D. Hopkins on the Scolytid borings from the same deposits. Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology 2, 67–92, pls VI–XV.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1900b. Adephagous and clavicorne Coleoptera from the Tertiary deposits at Florissant, Colorado, with descriptions of a few other forms and a systematic list of the non-rhynchophorous Tertiary Coleoptera of North America. Monograph of the United States Geological Survey 40.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1878. On the Dascillidae of New Zealand. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2, 40–59.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1882. On aquatic carnivorous Coleoptera or Dytiscidae. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 2, 179–1003.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1886. On New Zealand Coleoptera, with descriptions of new genera and species. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society (N.S.) 3, 351–404, pls 12–13.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1890. Fam. Nitidulidae. In Sharp, D., Matthews, A. & Lewis, G. (eds) Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insects. Coleoptera 2, 265–388, pls 8–12. London: R.H. Porter.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1983. The status of the staphylinid genera Derops Sharp and Rimulincola Sanderson (Coleoptera). Entomologica Scandinavica 14, 269–279.Google Scholar
Solodovnikov, A., Yue, Y., Tarasov, S. & Ren, D. 2013. Extinct and extant rove beetles meet in the matrix: early Cretaceous fossils shed light on the evolution of a hyperdiverse insect lineage (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae). Cladistics 29, 360–403.Google Scholar
Soriano, C., Declòs, X. & Ponomarenko, A. G. 2007. Beetle associations (Insecta: Coleoptera) from the Barremian (Lower Cretaceous) of Spain. Alavesia 1, 81–88.Google Scholar
Spahr, U. 1981. Systematischer Katalog der Berstein- und Kopal-Käfer (Coleoptera). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Ser. B 80, 1–107.Google Scholar
Statz, G. 1939–1940. Geradflügler und Wasserkäfer der oligocänen Ablagerungen von Rott. Decheniana 99A, 1–102.Google Scholar
Steffahny, G. E. 1842. Tentamen monographiae generis Byrrhi. Dissertation, Berolini, 8, 1–42.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1828. Mandibulata. 2. Illustrations of British entomology. London: Baldwin and Cradock (Suppl. H. G. Bohn). 200 pp.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. F. 1929. A systematic catalogue of British insects. Part 1. London: Baldwin and Cradock. xxxiv + 416 pp.Google Scholar
Théobald, N. 1937. Les insectes fossiles des terrains oligocènes de France. Nancy: G. Thomas. 473 pp.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1859. Skandinaviens Coleoptera, Synoptiskt Bearbetade. Vol. 1. Lund: Lundbergska Boktryckeriet. 290 pp.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1863 Skandinaviens Coleoptera, Synoptiskt Bearbetade. Vol. 5. Lund: Lundbergska Boktryckeriet. 340 pp.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1867 Skandinaviens Coleoptera, Synoptiskt Bearbetade. Vol. 9. Lund: Lundbergska Boktryckeriet. 219 pp.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. 1787. Museum naturalium Academiae Upsaliensis. Cujus psrtem quartam. Publica examini subjicit B. Bjerkem. Upsalae: J. Edman, 2, 44–58+1 pl.Google Scholar
Tikhomirova, A. L. 1968. Staphylinid beetles of the Jurassic of the Karatau (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). In Rohdendorf, B. B. (ed.) Jurassic insects of the Karatau, 139–154. Moscow: Akademiya Nauk SSSR. 252 pp. + 25 pls. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Tröster, G. 1991. Eine neue Gattung der Elateridae (Insecta: Coleoptera) Macropunctum g. n. aus der Messel-Formation des unteren Mittel-Eozän der Fundstätte Messel. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 139, 99–117.Google Scholar
Tröster, G. 1992. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Macropunctum (Elateridae, Pyrophorinae, Agripnini) aus der mitteleozänen Fossillagerstätte Eckfelder Maar (Eifel) mit Beschreibung einer neuen Art Macropunctum eckfeldi n. sp. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archive, B 30, 111–118.Google Scholar
Tröster, G. 1993. Zwei neue mitteleuropäische Arten der Gattung Tenomerga Neboiss 1984 aus dem Mitteleozän der Grube Messel und des Eckfelder Maar (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Cupedidae). Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv, B 31, 169–176.Google Scholar
Tröster, G. 1994. Neue Arten der Gattung Macropunctum (Insecta, Coleoptera, Elateridae) aus der Ölschieferfazies der mitteleozänen Messelformation der Grube Messel bei Darmstadt. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 68, 145–162.Google Scholar
Tshernyshev, S. E. 2016. New taxa of soft-winged flower beetles (Coleoptera, Malachiidae) in Baltic and Rovno amber. Paleontological Journal 50, 953–962.Google Scholar
Valentin, X., Gomez, B., Daviero-Gomez, V., Licht, A., Kirejtshuk, A. G., Ferchaud, P., Neraudeau, D., Vullo, R. & Garcia, G. 2014. Plant-dominated assemblage from the Albian-Cenomanien of Jaunay-Clan, South-Western France. Comptes Rendus Palevol 13, 443–454.Google Scholar
Villers, C. J. de 1789. Caroli Linnaei entomologia, faunae Suecicae desciptionibus aucta: […]. Paris: Lugduni, Piestre & Dellamolliere. xvi + 765 pp. + 3 pls.Google Scholar
Vit, S. 1977. Contribution à la connaissance des Eucinetidae (Coleoptera). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 84, 917–935.Google Scholar
Vit, S. 1985. Etude de la morphologie des espècies paléarctiques du genre Eucinetes germar et quelques remarques sur son utilisation taxonomique (Coleoptera Eucinetidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 92, 421–460.Google Scholar
Wappler, T. 2003. Die Insekten aus dem Mittel-Eozän des Eckfelder Maares, Vulkaneifel. Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 27, 1–234.Google Scholar
Weber, E. 1801. Observationes entomologicae, continents novorum quae condidit generum characteres, et nuper detectarum specierum descriptions. Kiliae: Impensis Bibliopolii Academici Novi. xii + 116 pp.Google Scholar
Wedmann, S. 1994. Fossile Vertreter der Eucnemidae und Throscidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) aus der mitteleozänen Messelformation. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg B 170, 65–793.Google Scholar
Weidlich, M. 1987. Systematik and Taxonomie der Buprestidae des mitteleozänen Geiseltales (Insecta, Coleoptera). Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften 12, 29–52.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1838. Synopsis of the genera of British insects. Coleoptera (sheets B–D4). In Westwood, J. O. (ed.) An introduction to the modern classification of insects; founded on the natural habits and corresponding organization of the different families, 1–44, Vol. 2. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans. 588 pp.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1854. Contributions to fossil entomology. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 10, 378–396.Google Scholar
Whalley, P. & Jarzembowski, E. A. 1985. Fossil insects from the lithographic limestone of Montsech (late Jurassic–early Cretaceous), Lerida Province, Spain. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 38, 381–412.Google Scholar
White, A. 1859. Note on the pupa-case of a coleopterous insect from Northern China. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3, 3, 284–90, pl. 7.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1909. New fossil Coleoptera from Florissant. American Journal Science and Arts 4, 28, 126–130.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1910. New fossil Coleoptera from Florissant, with notes on some already described. American Journal of Science 4, 47–51.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1911. Fossil Coleoptera from Florissant, with descriptions of several new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 30, 53–69.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1912. A report of some recent collections of fossil Coleoptera from the Miocene shales of Florissant. Bulletin from the Laboratory National History, State University of Iowa 6, 1–38.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1913. Fossil Coleoptera from Florissant in the United States National Museum. Proceedings of US National Museum 45, 283–303.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1914a. Twenty new Coleoptera from the Florissant shales. Transactions of American Entomological Society 40, 257–69, 9 pls.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1914b. New Miocene Coleoptera from Florissant. Bulletin of the Museum of Compative Zoölogy at the Harvard College 58, 423–494.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1916. The fossil Elateridae of Florissant. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy at the Harvard College 60, 493–527, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1917. New species of fossil beetles from Florissant, Colorado. Proceedings of US National Museum 52, 463–472.Google Scholar
Wittmer, W. 1963. A new cantharid from the Chiapas amber of Mexico. University of California Publications in Entomology 31, 53–59.Google Scholar
Wittmer, W. 1973. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Themus Motsch. (Coleoptera: Cantharidae). Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum Georg Frey 24, 186–228.Google Scholar
Wolf-Schwenninger, K. & Schawaller, W. 2007. Coleoptera: beetles. In Martill, D. M., Bechly, G. & Loveridge, R.F. (eds) The Crato fossil beds of Brazil: window into an ancient world, 338–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 625 pp.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1878. On the Occurrence of Branchipus (or Chirocephalus) in a fossil state, associated with Archaeoniscus, and with numerous insect-remains in the Eocene freshwater limestone of Gurnet Bay, Isle of Wight. Geological Magazine, New Series 5, 88–89.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1879. On the occurence of Branchipus (or Chirocephalus) in a fossil state, associated with Eosphaeroma and with numerous insect remains in the Eocene freshwater (Bembridge) Limestone of Gurnet Bay, Isle of Wight. Quaternary Journal of Geological Society 35, 342–350.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, S. & Takahashi, Y. 2016. Coproporus electron sp. nov., the first tachyporine rove beetle in Dominican amber (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Paläontologische Zeitschrift 90, 629–635.Google Scholar
Young, D. K. 1984. Anisotria shooki, a new genus and species of Pedilinae (Coleoptera: Pyrochroidae), with a note on the systematic position of Lithomacratria Wickham and key to the genera. Coleopterists Bulletin 38, 201–208.Google Scholar
Yue, Y., Zhao, Y. & Ren, D. 2010. Three new Mesozoic Staphylinids (Coleoptera) from Liaoning, China. Cretaceous Research 31, 61–70.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. 1988. The Late Jurassic Fossil Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) of China. Acta Entomologica Sinica 31, 79–84.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-F. 1989. Fossil insects from Shanwang, Shandong, China. Jinan: Shandong Science and Technology Publishing House. 459 pp. (In Chinese with Abstract in English.)Google Scholar
Zherikhin, V. V. 1977. Infraorder Cucujiformia. Family Acanthocnemidae. Family Lathridiidae. In Arnoldi, L.V., Zherikhin, V. V., Nikritin, L. M. & Ponomarenko, A. G. Mesozoic beetles (Proceedings of Palaeontological Institute of the USSR Ac. Sci., Vol. 161), 135–142. Moscow: Nauka. 204 pp. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Zherikhin, V. V. & Gratshev, V. G. 1995. A comparative study of the hind wing venation of the superfamily Curculionoidea, with phylogenetic implications. In Pakaluk, J. & Slipinski, S. A. (ed.) Biology, phylogeny and classification of Coleoptera. Papers celebrating the 80th birthday of Roy A. Crowson, 633–777. Warsaw: Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii, PAN. vi + 1092 pp.Google Scholar