Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:09:54.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arthropod larvae from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Klaus J. Müller  and
Dieter Walossek
Klaus J. Müller
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Institut für Paläontologie, Nuβallee 8, D-5300 Bonn 1, West Germany.
Dieter Walossek
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Institut für Paläontologie, Nuβallee 8, D-5300 Bonn 1, West Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four tiny obvious larvae unassignable to larger “Orsten” arthropods are described and reconstructed. Two of them have a naupliar appearance and may belong to crustaceans, whereas the other two represent as yet unknown types of euarthropodan larvae.

Keywords

ChelicerataCrustaceaEuarthropodamode of lifemorphologyPantopoda.
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , 1986 , pp. 157 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrens, W. 1984. Larvenentwicklung und Metamorphose von Pycnogonum litorale (Chelicerata, Pantopoda). ZOOMORPHOLOGIE 104, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1982. Origin of the Crusacea. In Abele, L. G. (ed.) Systematics, the fossil record, and biogeography. Vol. 1 of D. E. Bliss (ed.) The Biology of Crustacea, 65–92. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cressey, R. & Patterson, C. 1973. Fossil parasitic copepods from a Lower Cretaceous fish. SCIENCE 180, 1283–1285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortey, R. A. & Morris, S. F. 1978. Discovery of nauplius-like trilobite larvae. PALAEONTOLOGY 21 (4), 823–833, pl. 94.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. 1968. In Gruner, H.-E. (ed.) Dr. H. G. Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Vol. 5(1), Part 2(4), Section 3, Ostracoda, 409–568. Leipzig: Geest & Portig.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. & Newman, W. A. 1975. A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. FOSSILS STRATA 4, 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessler, R. R. & Sanders, H. L. 1966. Derocheilocaris typicus Pennak & Zinn (Mystacocarida) revisited. CRUSTACEANA 11, 142–155.Google Scholar
Jägersten, G. 1972. Evolution of the metazoan life cycle, a comprehensive theory. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kästner, A. 1967. Lehrbuch der Speziellen Zoologie, Part I, Wirbellose 2, Crustacea, 2nd edn, 847–1242. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Katona, S. K. 1971. The developmental stages of Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880) (Copepoda, Calanoida) raised in laboratory cultures, including a comparison with larvae of Eurytemora americana Williams, 1906, and Eurytemora herdmani Thompson & Scott, 1897. CRUSTACEANA 21, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korschelt, E. & Heider, K. 1936. Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Entwicklungeschichte der Tiere, Part 2 (28), Crustaceen, 571–634; Part 2(29), Pantopoden, 635–646. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, K. E. 1973. Schlüsselereignisse in der Evolution der Stammgruppe der Euarthropoda. ZOOL BEITR NF 19, 251–299.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, K. E. 1980. Schlüsselereignisse in der Evolution des Grundplans der Arachnata (Arthropoda). ABH NATURWISS VER HAMBURG (NF) 23, 163–327.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, K. E. 1983. Zum Problem der Monophylie der Crustacea. VERH NATURWISS VER HAMBURG (NF) 26, 293–320.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M. 1977. The Arthropoda, Habits, Functional Morphology and Evolution, 1–157. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1979. Phosphatocopine ostracods with preserved appendages from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. LETHAIA 12, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1982. Hesslandona unisulcata sp. nov. (Ostracoda) with phosphatized appendages from Upper Cambrian ‘Orsten’ of Sweden. In Bate, R. H. et al. (eds) A research manual of fossil and Recent ostracods, 276–307. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. 1983. Crustacea with preserved soft parts from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. LETHAIA 16, 93–109.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. 1985. Exceptional preservation in calcareous nodules. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON 311B, 67–73.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. & Walossek, D. 1985a. Skaracarida, a new order of Crustacea, from the Upper Cambrian of Västergötland, Sweden. FOSSILS STRATA 17, 1–65.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. & Walossek, D. 1985b. A remarkable arthropod fauna from the Upper Cambrian “Orsten” of Sweden. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH EARTH SCI 76, 161–172.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. & Walossek, D. 1986. Martinssonia elongata gen. et sp.n., a crustacean-like euarthropod from the Upper Cambrian Orsten of Sweden. ZOOL SCR 15, 73–92.Google Scholar
üller, K. J. & Walossek, D. in prep. Bredocaris admirabilis Müller, 1983, from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden and its ontogeny.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1963. The Cephalocarida. Functional morphology, larval development, comparative external anatomy. MEM CONNECTICUT ACAD ARTS SCI 15, 1–80.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L. & Hessler, R. R. 1964. The larval development of Lightiella incisa Gooding (Cephalocarida). CRUSTACEANA 7, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scourfield, D. J. 1926. On a new type of crustacean from the Old Red sandstone (Rhynie Chert bed, Aberdeenshire)—Lepidocaris rhyniensis gen. et sp. nov. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON 214, 153–187.Google Scholar
Scourfield, D. J. 1940. Two new and nearly complete specimens of young stages of the Devonian fossil crustacean Lepidocaris rhyniensis. PROC LINN SOC 152, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewing, R. 1963. Zum Problem der Arthropodenkopfsegmentierung. ZOOL ANZ 170, 429–468.Google Scholar
Siewing, R. (ed) 1985. Lehrbuch der Zoologie, II, Systematik, 3rd edn, 1–1107. Stuttgart & New York: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. 1979. Significance of later embryonic stages and head development. In Gupta, A. P. (ed.) Arthropod phytogeny, 107–135. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.Google Scholar