Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:53:09.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXXI.—Studies on the Reproductive System in the Guinea-Pig: Post-partum Repair of the Uterus, and the Associated Appearances in the Ovaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Thomas Nicol
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Anatomy, University of Glasgow.

Extract

In the course of researches on the reproductive system of Cavia attention was drawn to certain variations in the rapidity of the repair of the endometrium after parturition. It was shown by Loeb (1914) and by Stockard and Papanicolaou (1917) that in the guinea-pig there is a close correlation during the œstrous cycle between the changes in the uterus and the events in the ovaries. It happens that in practically all the animals used for embryological researches in this department the ovaries were preserved and have been serially sectioned. It seemed worth while, therefore, to work out in the material available the relations of the post-partum changes in the uterus with the conditions in the ovaries. Recent researches have brought to light further interesting correlations between the anterior pituitary and the ovaries, and indirectly with the uterus, but in the present communication no attempt will be made to deal with this larger question.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Allen, E., 1932. Sex and Internal Secretions—A Survey of Recent Research, Ballière, Tindal & Cox, London. (Contains an extensive Bibliography.)Google Scholar
Corner, G. W., 1921. “Cyclic Changes in the Ovaries and Uterus of the Sow, and their Relation to the Mechanism of Implantation,” Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub., No. 276, p. 117.Google Scholar
Deanesly, R., and Parkes, A. S., 1931. “The Functions of the Corpus Luteum. V.—Changes in the Sterile Horn during Pregnancy, and their Relation to Changes in the Corpus Luteum,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cix, p. 196.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M., and Swezy, O., 1931. “Ovogenesis and the Normal Follicular Cycle in Adult Mammalia,” Mem. Univ. Calif., vol. ix, No. 3, p. 119.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M., and Swezy, O., 1931. “The Uterus-Ovary Relationship and its Bearing on the Time of Ovulation in Primates,” Amer. Journ. Phys., vol. xcvi, No. 3, p. 628.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. J., 1933. “The Restoration and Regeneration of the Epithelium and Endometrium of the Uterus of Cavia Post Partum in Non-pregnant Animals,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, pt. ii (No. 21), p. 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., 1927. The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., and Marshall, F. H. A., 1925. Reproduction in the Rabbit, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hartman, Cael, 1923. “The Œstrous Cycle in the Opossum,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xxxii, p. 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illingworth, R. E., and Robson, J. M., 1932. “Factors influencing the Actions of Corpus Luteum Extracts on the Rabbit's Uterus,” Journ. Phys., vol. lxxvi, No. 1, p. 137.Google Scholar
Kuramitsu, C., and Loeb, L., 1921. “The Involution of the Uterus following Labor and the Influence of Castration and Suckling on the Process of Involution,” Amer. Journ. Phys., vol. lv, p. 422.Google Scholar
Loeb, L., 1906. “The Formation of the Corpus Luteum in the Guinea-Pig,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., February, p.416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L., 1906. “Ueber die Entwickelung des Corpus Luteum beim Meerschweinchen,” Anat. Anz., Bd. xxviii, S. 102.Google Scholar
Loeb, L., 1911. “The Cyclic Changes in the Ovary of the Guinea-Pig,” Journ. Morph., vol. xxii, p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L., 1914. “The Correlation between the Cyclic Changes in the Uterus and the Ovaries in the Guinea-Pig,” Biol. Bull., vol. xxvii, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L., 1923. “The Mechanism of the Sexual Cycle with special reference to the Corpus Luteum,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xxxii, p. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L., 1932. “Some Mechanisms in the Sexual Cycle of the Guinea-Pig,” Australian Journ. Exper. Biol., vol. ix, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. A., and Evans, H. M., 1922. “The Œstrous Cycle in the Rat and its Associated Phenomena,” Mem. Univ. Calif., vol. vi, p. 1.Google Scholar
Nicol, T., 1933. “Studies on the Reproductive System in the Guinea-Pig: Variations in the Œstrous Cycle in the Virgin Animal, after Parturition, and during Pregnancy,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. liii, pt. iii (No. 16), p. 220.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. S., 1929. The Internal Secretions of the Ovary, Longmans, Green & Co., London. (Contains an extensive Bibliography.)Google Scholar
Robson, J. M., and Illingworth, R. E., 1931. “Pregnancy Changes in the Rabbit's Uterus and their Relation to Endocrine Activity,” Quart. Journ. Exper. Phys., vol. xxi, p. 93.Google Scholar
Robson, J. M., 1932. “Pregnancy Changes in the Rabbit's Uterus and their Relation to Endocrine Activity—II. The Action of Gonadotropic Preparations of the Pituitary and of Pregnancy Urine,” Quart. Journ. Exper. Phys., vol. xxii, No. 1, p. 7.Google Scholar
Robson, J. M., 1932. “Pregnancy Changes in the Rabbit's Uterus and their Relation to Endocrine Activity—III.,” Quart. Journ. Exper. Phys., vol. xxii, No. 3, p. 209.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E., and Engle, E. T., 1927. “Experimental Evidence regarding the Rôle of the Anterior Pituitary in the Development and Regulation of the Genital System,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xl, p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squier, R. R., 1932. “The Living Egg and Early Stages of its Development in the Guinea-Pig,” Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub., No. 433, p. 223.Google Scholar
Stockard, C. R., and Papanicolaou, G. N., 1917. “The Existence of a Typical ŒSstrous Cycle in the Guinea-Pig—with a Study of its Histological and Physiological Changes,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol xxii, p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar