Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:59:03.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXXII.—Report on Fossil Fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland in the Silurian Rocks of the South of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Ramsay H. Traquair
Ramsay H. Traquair
Affiliation:
Keeper of the Natural History Collections in the Museum of Science and Art, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the autumn of last year (1897), Sir A. Geikie, F.R.S., Director-General of the Geological Survey, kindly placed in my hands for description an important collection of fossil fish-remains from the Silurian rocks of the Lesmahagow district, which had been made by Messrs Macconochie and Tait, collectors to the Survey. I accordingly prepared a brief report on these fishes, which was included by the Director-General in his Summary of Progress for that year.

The collection was, however, considerably increased by additional work on the part of Mr Tait in the spring of the present year (1898). Many better and more complete specimens were procured, and I was able to define one new genus and species, which had previously been represented only by undeterminable fragments. The results gained by the examination of the entire collection I now propose, with Sir Archibald Geikie's sanction, to lay before this Society in detailed form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , 1900 , pp. 827 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Works Referred to

1. Agassiz, L.–“Recherches sur les Poissons Fossiles.” Neuchâtel, 1833-1843.Google Scholar
2. Agassiz, L.–“Monographie des Poissons fossiles du vieux Gres rouge.” Neuchâtel and Soleure, 1844.Google Scholar
3. Alth, A. v.–“Ueber die palæozoischen Gebilde Podoliens und deren Versteinerungen,” Abh. der k. k. geolog. Reichsanst, Bd. vii. Heft 1. Wien, 1874.Google Scholar
4. Alth, A. v.–“Ueber die Zusammengehörigkeit der den Fischgattungen Pteraspis, Cyathaspis, und Scaphaspis zugeschriebenen Schilder,” Beitr. Palœont. Oesterreich-Ungarus, vol. v., 1886.Google Scholar
5. Claypole, E. W.–“On the Structure of the American Pteraspidian, Palœaspis (Claypole): with Remarks on the Family,” Qu. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlviii., 1892, pp. 542–561.Google Scholar
6. Cope, E. D.–“Synopsis of the Families of Vertebrata,” Americ. Naturalist, vol. xxiii., 1889, pp. 849–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cope, E. D.–“On the Phylogeny of the Vertebrata,” Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., vol. xxx., 1892, pp. 278–281.Google Scholar
8. Dean, B.–“Fishes, Living and Fossil.” New York, 1895.Google Scholar
9. Gürich, G.–“Ueber Placodermen und andere devonische Fischreste im Breslauer Mineralogischen Museum,” Zeitschr. der deutschen geol. Gesellschaft, vol. xliii., 1891, pp. 902–913.Google Scholar
10. Howes, G. B.–“On the Affinities, Inter-relationships, and Systematic Position of the Marsipobranchii,” Trans. Biol. Soc. Liverpool., vol. vi. pp. 122–147.Google Scholar
11. Huxley, T. H.–“On the nature of the Craniofacial apparatus of Petromyzon,” Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. x., 1876, pp. 412–429.Google Scholar
12. Hunter-Selkirk, J. R. S.—“Three Months’ Tent Life among the Silurian Hills of Logan Water, Lesmahagow,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vii. pt. 2, 1865, pp. 272–278.Google Scholar
13. Jaekel, O.—“Referat über E. W. Claypole: On the structure of the American Pteraspidian,” &c. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, 1894, Bd. ii. pp. 466–7.Google Scholar
14. Lankester, E. Ray.–“Fossil Cephalaspidæ of Great Britain,” Palæontographical Society, 1868 and 1870.Google Scholar
15. Lankester, E. Ray.– “On Holaspis sericeus and on the Relationship of the Fish-genera Pteraspis, Cyathaspis, and Scaphaspis,” Geol. Mag., vol. x., 1873, pp. 241–245.Google Scholar
16. Lankester, E. Ray.–“The Taxonomic Position of the Pteraspidæ, Cephalaspidse and Asterolepidae,” Natural Science, vol. xi., 1897, pp. 45–47. (Answered by Mr Smith Woodward, ib., p. 144.)Google Scholar
17. M'Coy, F.–“On the supposed fish remains figured on Plate 4 of the ‘Silurian System,’” Qu. Journ. Geol. Soc., ix., 1853, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
18. M'Coy, F.–“A Systematic Description of the British Palæozoic Fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge.” London, 1851-1855.Google Scholar
19. Murchison, R. I.–“The Silurian System,” vol. i. London, 1839. Contains descriptions of fish remains, with figures, by L. Agassiz.Google Scholar
20. Murchison, R. I.–“Siluria.” London, 1854.Google Scholar
21. Pander, C. H.–“Monographie der fossilen Fische des silurischen Systems des russisch-baltischen Gouvernements.” St Petersburg, 1856.Google Scholar
22. Pander, C. H.–“Ueber die Placodermen des devonischen Systems.” St Petersburg, 1857.Google Scholar
23. Patten, W.–“On Structures resembling dermal Bones in Limulus,” Anat. Anzeiger., Bd. ix. No. 14, 1894, pp. 429–438.Google Scholar
24. Powrie, J.–“On the Earliest known Vestiges of Vertebrate Life; being a Description of the Fish Remains of the Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Edin., vol. i., 1870, pp. 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Reis, O. M.–“Zur Kenntniss des Skelets der Acanthodinen,” Geognostische Jahreshefte, vi., 1893.Google Scholar
26. Reis, O. M.–“Ueber Acanthodes Bronni, Agassiz,” Morphologische Arbeiten herausgegeben von G. Schwalbe, vi.Google Scholar
27. Rohon, J. Y.–“Die obersilurischen Fische von Oesel. I. Theil. Thyestidse und Tremataspidæ,” Mem. Acad. des Sciences St. Petersbourg (7), vol. xxxviii. No. 13, 1892.Google Scholar
28. Rohon, J. Y.–“Die obersilurischen Fische von Oesel. II. Theil. Selachii, Dipnoi, Ganoidei, Pteraspidæ und Cephalaspidæ,” Mem. Acad. des Sciences dp. St Petersbourg, vol. xli. No. 5, 1893.Google Scholar
29. Rohon, J. Y.–“Beiträge zur Classification der Palæozoischen Fische,” Sitzungsb. Kön. böhm. Gesellsch. der Wissenschaften, Math. Naturw. Classe, 1896.Google Scholar
30. Schlüter, C. A. T.–“Ueber Panzerfische aus dem rheinisch-westfälischen Devon,” Sitzungsb. niederrh. Gesellsch., Bonn, 1887, pp. 120–128.Google Scholar
31. Schmidt, F.–“Ueber die Pteraspiden überhaupt und über Pteraspis Kneri aus den obersilurischen Schichten Galiziens insbesondere,” Verh. der Kais. russischen minerolog. Gesellsch. zu St Petersburg (2), viii., 1873.Google Scholar
32. Traquair, R. H.–“Notes on Carboniferous Selachii,” Geol. Mag. (3), vol. v., 1888, pp. 81, 86.Google Scholar
33. Traquair, R. H.–“On the Structure of Coccosteus decipiens, Ag.,” Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (6), vol. v., 1890, pp. 125–136.Google Scholar
34. Traquair, R. H.–“The Fossil Vertebrata of the Moray Firth Area.” In Harvie-Brown, and Buckley's, Vertebrate Fauna of the Moray Basin. Edinburgh, 1896.Google Scholar
35. Traquair, R. H.–“Additional Notes on the Fossil Fishes of the Upper Old Red Sandstone of the Moray Firth Area,” Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinb., vol. xiii., 1897, pp. 376–385.Google Scholar
36. Traquair, R. H.–“On Thelodus Pagei (Powrie) from the Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., vol. xxxix., 1899, pp. 595–602.Google Scholar
37. Trautschold, H.–“Ueber Coccosteus megalopteryx, Trd., Coccosteus obtusus and Cheliophorus Verneuili, Ag.,” Zeitschr. der deutschen geol. Gesellschaft, 1889, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
38. Woodward, A. Smith.–“Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum,” Part II., 1891.Google Scholar
39. Woodward, A. Smith.–“The Problem of the Priniæval Sharks,” Natural Science, vol. vi, 1895, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
40. Woodward, A. Smith.–“Edward Drinker Cope” (obituary notice). Natural Science, vol. x., 1897, pp. 377–381.Google Scholar
41. Woodward, A. Smith.–“Outlines of Vertebrate Palæontology.” Cambridge, 1898.Google Scholar
42. Zittel, C. v.–“Handbuch der Palæontologies” Division I., vol. iii. pt.l. Munich and Leipzig, 1887.Google Scholar
43. Zittel, C. v.–“Grundzüge der Palæontologie (Palæozoologie).” Munich and Leipzig, 1895.Google Scholar