Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:56:33.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXXII.—On the Feeding Mechanism of the Fairy Shrimp, Chirocephalus diaphanus Prévost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

H. Graham Cannon
H. Graham Cannon
Affiliation:
Professor of Zoology, Sheffield University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chirocephalus diaphanus, the Fairy Shrimp, feeds on minute suspended particles and organisms that it separates from water currents produced by its limbs. According to Lundblad (1920, p. 41), in the closely similar form, Tanymastix stagnalis (L.), an orally directed current is produced along the mid-ventral line between the trunk limbs which actually carries food particles to the mouth, the current itself being produced by the sweeping action of the anteriorly directed basal parts of the proximal endites of the trunk limbs. According to Storch (1925a, p. 387), the particles are not carried forwards on a current but are swept forwards from limb to limb until they reach the mouth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , 1928 , pp. 807 - 822
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature List

Borradaile, L. A., 1926. “Notes upon Crustacean Limbs,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., London, ser. 9, vol. xvii, pp. 193–213, pls. vii–x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borradaile, L. A., 1927. “On the Primitive Phyllopodium,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., London, ser. 9, vol. xviii, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T., 1926. Nature, vol. cxviii, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1924. “On the Development of an Estherid Crustacean,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, ser. B, vol. ccxii, pp. 395–430, pls. xviii–xxiv.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1927. “On the Feeding Mechanism of Nebalia bipes,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., lv, pp. 355–370.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., and Manton, S. M., 1927. “On the Feeding Mechanism of a Mysid Crustacean, Hemimysis lamornœ,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., lv, pp. 219–254, pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J., 1925. “Studies on Arthropoda, II,” Copenhagen, pp. 1–176, pls. i–viii.Google Scholar
Lundblad, O., 1920. “Vergleichende Studien über die Nahrungsaufnahme einiger schwedischer Phyllopoden,” Arkiv f. Zoologi, Stockholm, Bd. 13, No. 16, pp. 1–114, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Naumann, E., 1921. “Spezielle Untersuchungen über die Ernahrungsbiologie des tierischer Limnoplanktons, I. über die Technik des Nahrungserwerbes bei den Cladoceren und ihre Bedeutung fur die Biologie der Gewässertypen,” Act. Univ., Lund, N.F., Avd. 2, Bd. 17, Nr. 4, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Storch, O., 1925a. “Der Phyllopoden-Fangapparat,” Intern. Rev. Hydrobiol., Leipzig, Bd. 12, 1 Teil, pp. 369–91; Bd. 13, 2 Teil, pp. 68–93, pls. iii–v.Google Scholar
Storch, O., 1925b. “Cladocera,” Biologie der Tiere Deutschlands., Berlin, Lief. 15, pp. 23–102.Google Scholar
Storch, O., and Pfisterer, O., 1925. “Der Fangapparat von Diaptomus,” Zs. vergl. Physiol., Berlin, Bd. 3, pp. 330–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar