Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:29:43.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXXII.—Jurassic Plants from Cromarty and Sutherland, Scotland.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. C. Seward  and
N. Bancroft
A. C. Seward
Affiliation:
Professor of Botany, Cambridge
N. Bancroft
Affiliation:
Newnham College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an account of the Jurassic flora of Sutherland, published in 1911, it was stated that a few petrified specimens from Eathie Bay, Cromarty, and from Helmsdale on the coast of Sutherland, would be dealt with in a subsequent paper. One of the best preserved of them forms the subject of a recent communication to the Royal Society of London. The majority of the specimens described in the following pages are from the Hugh Miller collection in the Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh. We take this opportunity of expressing our thanks to the Director of the Museum for the loan of the fossils, and for permission to have sections prepared for microscopical examination. For the loan of the section reproduced in Plate II. fig. 19 we are indebted to the generosity of Dr Kidston.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , 1913 , pp. 867 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barber, C.A., (98), “Cupressinoxylon vectense; a Fossil Conifer from the Lower Greensand of Shanklin, in the Isle of Wight,” Annals of Botany, vol. xii. p. 329.Google Scholar
Bernard, C. (04), “Le bois centripète dans les feuilles de Conifères,” Beiheft. Bot. Cent., Bd. xvii., Heft 2, p. 241.Google Scholar
Dunker, W. (56), “Ueber mehre Pflanzenreste aus dem Quadersandsteine von Blankenburg,” Palaeontograph., Bd. iv. p. 179.Google Scholar
Fliche, P. (00), “Contribution à la flore fossile de la Haute-Marne (Infracrétacé),” Bull. Soc. Sci. Nancy.Google Scholar
Gibbs, L. S. (12), “On the Development of the Female Strobilus in Podocarpus,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxvi. p. 515.Google Scholar
Gothan, W. (05), “Zur Anatomie lebender und fossiler Gymnospermen-Hölzer,” Abh. K. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst. [N.F.], Heft 44.Google Scholar
Gothan, W. (08), “Die fossilen Hölzer von König Karls Land,” K. Svensk. Vetenskapsakad. Hand., Bd. xlii., No. 10.Google Scholar
Gothan, W. (12), “Ueber die Gattung Thinnfeldia Ettingshausen,” Abh. Naturhist. Ges. Nürnberg, Bd. xix. Heft 3.Google Scholar
Gothan, W. (122) “Nachtrag zur Arbeit über Thinnfeldia Ettingshausen,” Abh. Naturhist. Ges. Nürnberg., Bd. xix. Heft 4.Google Scholar
Heer, O. (75), “Die Kreide-Flora der arctischen Zone,” Flor. Foss. Arctica, vol. iii.Google Scholar
Heer, O. (82), “Flora fossilis Grönlandica,” Flor. Foss. Arctica., vol. vi.Google Scholar
Holliok, A., and Jeffrey, E. C. (06), “Affinities of certain Cretaceous Plant Remains commonly referred to the Genera Dammara and Brachyphyllum,” New York Bot. Gard., No. 79.Google Scholar
Holliok, A., and Jeffrey, E. C. (09), “Studies of Cretaceous Coniferous Remains from Kreischerville, New York,” Mem. New York Bot. Gard., vol. iii.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, E. C. (05), “The Comparative Anatomy and Phylogeny of the Coniferales. Part II.: The Abietineæ,” Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. vi.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, E. C. (07), “Araucariopitys, a New Genus of Araucarians,” Bot. Gaz., vol. xliv. p. 435.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, E. C. (10), “On the Affinities of the Genus Yezonin,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxiv. p. 767.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, E. C. (11), “The Affinities of Geinitzia gracillima,” Bot. Gaz., vol. 1. p. 21.Google Scholar
Lignier, O. (07), “Végétaux fossiles de Normandie: iv. Bois divers (1re sér.),” Mém. Soc. Linn. Norm., tome xxii.Google Scholar
Miller, H. (57), The Testimony of the Rocks, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G. (97), “Die mesozoischen Flora Spitzbergens,” K. Svensk. Vetenskapsakad. Hand., Bd. xxx. No. 1.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G. (08), “Paläobotanische Mitteilungen, vii.,” K. Svensk. Vetenskapsakad. Hand., Bd. xliii., No. 8.Google Scholar
Pilger, R., (03), “Taxaceæ.” Ex Das Pflanzenreich, A. Engler, Heft 18 (iv. 5).Google Scholar
Potonié, H. (99), Lehrbuch der Pflanzenpalaeontologie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Saporta, Le Comte de (73), “Plantes Jurassiques” tome i., Pal. Franç., 2e sér.Google Scholar
Schenk, A. (67), Die fossile Flora der Grenzschichten der Keuper und Lias Frankens., Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Schenk, A. (87), “Fossile Pflanzen aus der Albourskette,” Biblioth. Bot., Heft 6.Google Scholar
Schimper, W. P., and Mougeot, A. (44), Monographie des Plantes fossiles du Grès Bigarré de la chaine des Vosges, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., (96), “A New Species of Conifer, Pinites Ruffordi, from the English Wealden Formation, Journ. Linn. Soc., vol. xxxii, p. 417.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. (04) “The Jurassic Flora.” II. Catalogue of the Mesozoic Plants in the Dept. of Geology, Brit. Mus., London.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. (11), “The Jurassic Flora of Sutherland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvii. Pt. iv., No. 23, p. 643.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. (12), “A Petrified Williamsonia from Scotland,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. cciii. p. 101.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., and Ford, S. (06), “The Araucarieæ, Recent and Extinct,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. cxcviii. p. 305.Google Scholar
Stopes, M. C. (11), “A Reply to Professor Jeffrey's Article on Yezonia and Cryptomeriopisis,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxv. p. 269.Google Scholar
Stopes, M. C., and Fujii, K., (10), “Studies on the Structure and Affinities of Cretaceous Plants,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. cci. p. 1.Google Scholar
Velenovsky, J. (85), Die Gymnospermen der böhmischen Kreideformation, Prag.Google Scholar