Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:23:44.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXIX.—A Contribution to the Experimental Morphology of Lycopodium Selago, with Special Reference to the Development of Adventitious Shoots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

S. Williams
S. Williams
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Plant Morphology in the University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problems of regeneration, and those relating to the production of adventitious structures in general, have not been extensively studied in the Lycopodiales, although the production of adventitious structures, some of them regenerative in nature, has been recorded for all four of the living genera. Selaginella has been examined more thoroughly in this respect than the other three genera. Adventitious roots have been induced to develop from decapitated rhizophores and from isolated lengths of stem; the production of adventitious shoots from rhizophore rudiments has also been obtained by experimental methods. Goebel (7, p. 1220) has described the development of adventitious buds on the leaf bases of Isoetes lacustris, and Osborn (12) has described interesting regenerative developments from detached leaves of Phylloglossum Drummondii. A number of examples of regeneration in various species of Lycopodium has been recorded. Goebel (5, p. 46) states that the first leaves of embryo plants of L. inundatum may produce adventitious shoots. The same writer (6, p. 83) has recorded, but not described in detail, the development of adventitious outgrowths from the decapitated shoots of young plants of L. Selago and from isolated bulbil leaves of the same species. The development of adventitious buds on isolated roots and leaves of L. ramulosum has been described by Holloway (8).

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , 1934 , pp. 711 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

1.Boodle, L. A., 1920. “The Mode of Origin and the Vascular Supply of the Adventitious Leaves of Cyclamen,” Ann. Hot., vol. xxxiv.Google Scholar
2.Bower, F. O., 1926. The Filicales, vol. ii.Google Scholar
3.Czurda, V., 1923. “Zur Kenntnis der Brutzwiebeln von Lycopodium Selago und L. lucidulum,“ Flora, N.F., Bd. 16.Google Scholar
4.Garner, and Allard, , 1923. “Further Studies in Photoperiodism,” Journ. Agric. Research, vol. xxiii.Google Scholar
5.Goebel, K., 1900. Organography of Plants.Google Scholar
6.Goebel, K., 1915–1918. Organographie der Pflanzen, Zweite Aufl.Google Scholar
7.Goebel, K., 1930. Organographie der Pflanzen, Dritte Aufl.Google Scholar
8.Holloway, J. E., 1916. “Studies in the New Zealand Species of the Genus Lycopodium. Pt. II, Methods of Vegetative Reproduction,” Trans. New Zealand Inst., vol. xlix.Google Scholar
9.Kidston, R., and Lang, W. H. “On Old Red Sandstone Plants showing Structure, from the Rhynie Chert Bed, Aberdeenshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vols. li and lii.Google Scholar
10.Lang, W. H., 1915. Presidential Address to Section K of the British Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
11.Lang, W. H., 1924. “On Some Deviations from the Normal Morphology of the Shoot in Osmunda regalis” Mem. and Proc. Manchester Lit. and Phil. Soc., vol. lxviii.Google Scholar
12.Osborn, T. G. B., 1919. “Some Observations on the Tuber of Phylloglossum,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxxiii.Google Scholar
13.Smith, R. W., 1920. “Bulbils of Lycopodium lucidulum,“ Bot. Gaz., vol. lxix.Google Scholar
14.Williams, S., 1931. “An Analysis of the Vegetative Organs of Selaginella grandis Moore,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii.Google Scholar