Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:14:27.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXIV.—The Specialized Area of Skin Glands in Aotes Humboldt (Simiæ Platyrrhini)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

W. C. Osman Hill
Affiliation:
Prosector, Zoological Society of London
H. M. Appleyard
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Wool Industries Research Association, Leeds.
L. Auber
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Wool Industries Research Association, Leeds.

Synopsis

The scent-producing area of closely packed holocrine and apocrine skin-glands in Aotes has an atypical, caudal position. Whilst most of the holocrine glands open into hair follicles by ordinary short ducts, some of the ducts are elongated, opening either into follicles or on the skin surface. The holocrine and apocrine secretions, in conjunction with the peculiar splitting of individual hairs, cause felting of the pelage on the gland field. A peculiar structure of the hairs facilitates their splitting. Evolution and function of the gland field are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Auber, L., 1952. “The Anatomy of Follicles Producing Wool Fibres, with special reference to Keratinization”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 62, 191254.Google Scholar
Auber, L., forthcoming. “The Structure and Development of Fibres in Deer”.Google Scholar
Auber, L., and Appleyard, H. M., 1951. “Surface Cells of Feather Barbs”, Nature, Lond., 168, 736.Google Scholar
Auber, L., and Ryder, M. L., 1956. “Anomalies in Structure and Development of Wool Fibres”, Proc. 1st Int. Wool Text. Res. Conf. Ami. 1955, Melbourne, vol. F, 3662.Google Scholar
Charlett, S. M., 1955. “Microtechnical Methods in the Textile Laboratory”, Text. Rec., 73, 6871.Google Scholar
Hill, W. C. Osman, 1951. “Epigastric Gland of Tarsius”, Nature, Lond., 167, 994.Google Scholar
Hill, W. C. Osman, 1953. Primates, Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy, I–IV. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, W. C. Osman, 1956. “Body Odour in Lorises”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 127, 580.Google Scholar
Lochte, T., 1938. Atlas der menschlichen und tierischen Haare. Leipsic: Schoeps.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E., 1941. “Notes on Members of the Genus Alouatta and Aotes”, Ark. Zool., 33A, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Ludford, B. J., 1925. “Cell Organs during Keratinization in Normal and Malignant Growth”, Quart. J. Mier. Sci., 69, 2757.Google Scholar
Maximow, A. A., 1931. A Textbook of Histology (completed and edited by Bloom, W.). Philadelphia and London: Saunders.Google Scholar
Oyama, R., 1904. “Entwicklungsgeschichte des Deckhaares der weissen Maus”, Arb. Anat. Inst., Wiesbaden, 23, 585607.Google Scholar
Pinkus, F., 1927. “Die Anatomie der Haut”, Handbuch der Haut- und Geschlechtskrankheiten, I, pt. 1. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Quay, W. B., 1954. “Durable Whole Mounts of Sebaceous Glands colored with Oil Blue N”, Stain Tech., 29, 281284.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. T., 1949. “A Brief Review of the Mammals of Suriname (Dutch Guiana) based on a Collection made in 1938”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 119, 755789.Google Scholar
Schwarz, W., 1937. “Die Sternaldrüse bei den Klammeraffen, Ateles. Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Konzentrierung niederer Einheiten zu höheren organähnlichen Gebilden”, Morph. Jb., 79, 600633.Google Scholar
Segall, A., 1918. “Über die Entwicklung und den Wechsel der Haare beim Meerschweinchen”, Arch. Mikr. Anat., 91, 218282.Google Scholar
Shelley, W. B., Hurley, H. J., and Nicholls, A. C., 1953. “Axillary Odor”, Arch. Derm. Syph., Wien, 68, 430446.Google Scholar
Sonntag, C. F., 1924. Morphology and Evolution of the Apes and Man. London: Balliere, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Tachibana, O., 1936. “Über die circumanalen Drüsen und insbesondere die freien Talgdrüsen des Menschen und einiger Affen”, Kaibogaku Zassi, Tokyo, 9, 238294. (Abstract in Jap. J. Med. Sci. (Anat.), 1938, 7, 129–130.)Google Scholar
Unna, P. G., 1900. Histologischer Atlas zur Pathologie der Haut (issue 4). Hamburg and Leipsic: Voss.Google Scholar
Waldeyer, W., 1882. “Untersuchungen über die Histogenese der Horngebilde, insbesondere der Haare und Federn”, Beiträge zur Anatomie und Embryologie (Festschrift für Jacob Henle). Bonn: Cohen, 141162.Google Scholar
Waterman, H. C., 1939. “Preparation of Hardened Embedding Paraffins having Low Melting Points”, Stain Tech., 14, 5562Google Scholar
Wildman, A. B., 1954. The Microscopy of Animal Textile Fibres. Leeds: Wool Industries Research Association.Google Scholar
Wislocki, G. B., 1930. “A Study of Scent Glands in the Marmosets, especially Œdipomidas geoffroyi”, J. Mammal., 11, 475483.Google Scholar
Wislocki, G. B., 1936. “The External Genitalia of the Simian Primates”, Hum. Bid., 8, 309347.Google Scholar
Wislocki, G. B., and Schultz, A. H., 1925. “On the Nature of Modifications of the Skin in the Sternal Region of certain Primates”, J. Mammal., 6, 236243.Google Scholar