Article contents
XXI.—A further Contribution to the Freshwater Plankton of the Scottish Lochs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2012
Extract
Our first investigation of Scottish plankton in 1901–2, although only tentative and somewhat meagre, was sufficient to show that, as regards the phytoplankton, the lochs of the west and north-west of Scotland were probably richer than any lakes previously examined. Owing to the extraordinary richness of the few collections then examined, it was considered eminently desirable that the investigation should be further extended. This we have been enabled to do by means of a third successive grant from the Royal Society, and the present paper is one of the results of a visit to the north-west of Scotland in July, August, and September, 1903.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , 1906 , pp. 477 - 518
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906
References
page 479 note * Bathymetrical Survey of the Freshwater Lochs of Scotland, part v.—Lochs of the Morar Basin—by Dr Johnston, T. N., The Scot. Geog. Mag., Sept. 1904, vol. xx., No. 9Google Scholar
page 499 note * Mr Murray has also collected this species from the following lochs:—Lochs Nan Eun and Bhaic, Perthshire; Loch nan Cuinne, Sutherland; Lochs Burraland and Littlester, Shetlands. It is entirely due to Mr Murray's investigations that this species is known from the British Islands.
page 419 note * West, W. and West, G. S., “Scottish Freshwater Plankton, No. 1,” Journ. Linn. Soc., bot., xxxv., 1903, pp. 519–556, pls. 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 511 note * We hope in a short time to give a full account of the phytoplankton of the loughs of the west and south-west of Ireland, and also of the lakes of the English Lake District.
page 512 note * W. West and G. S. West, l.e., p. 554.
page 512 note † Wesenberg-Lund, C., “A Comparative Study of the Lakes of Scotland and Denmark,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., xxv., 1905.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by