Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:07:13.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XII.—The Evolution of the Eyebrow Region of the Forehead, with Special Reference to the Excessive Supraorbital Development in the Neanderthal Race

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Extract

One of the most striking features of the famous Neanderthal cranium consists in the strong projection which is exhibited in the glabellar and the supraorbital or eyebrow regions of the frontal bone. This character is rendered all the more important from the fact that all the specimens which have been collected since the Neanderthal cranium was discovered (1857), and which have been shown to belong to the same remote geological period, possess the same, or at least very much the same, remarkable prominence in the eyebrow region. These specimens are not very numerous, but, inasmuch as they represent the earliest remains of man with which we are acquainted, they possess a very special interest. In addition to the Neanderthal cranium, the group includes the two Spy crania, the Gibraltar skull, and the recently discovered Krapina remains. The Krapina remains are in a very fragmentary condition, but they apparently consist of portions of the skeletons of ten individuals, and the frontal bones all present the character in question.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Referred to in the Text

(1)Bianchi, , “J seni frontali e le arcate sopraciliari studiate nei crani del delinquenti, degli alienati e dei normali,” Archivio per l'antrop. e l'etnologia, 1892.Google Scholar
(2)Cunningham, D. J., “The Head of an Aboriginal Australian,” Journ. Royal Anthrop. Instit., vol. xxxvii. 1907.Google Scholar
(3)Cunningham, D. J., The Australian Forehead: Anthropological Essays presented to Edward Burnett Tylor, in honour of his 75th birthday, 2nd October 1907, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(4)Giufrida-Ruggeri, V. Dr, “Nuove ricerche morfologiche e craniometriche,” Atti della Società Romana di Antropologia, voi. viii., fase. 1, 1901, p. 21.Google Scholar
(5)Schwalbe, G., “Über die Schädelformen der ältesten Menschenrassen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Schädels von Egisheim,” Mitteil. d. philomath. Gesellschaft in Elsass-Lothringen, v., 1897.Google Scholar
(6)Schwalbe, G., “Studien über Pithecanthropus erectus (Dubois),” Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, Band i., 1899.Google Scholar
(7)Schwalbe, G., “Über die ältesten Menschenrassen,” Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 1899, No. 1.Google Scholar
(8)Schwalbe, G.Der Neanderthalschädel,” Bonner Jahrbücher, Heft 106, 1901.Google Scholar
(9)Schwalbe, G., “Zur Frage der Abstammung des Menschen,” Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, Mai 1906.Google Scholar
(10)Schwalbe, G.Das Schädelfragment von Brüx und verwandte Schädelformen,” Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, Mai 1906 (Sonderheft).Google Scholar
(11)Schwalbe, G.Das Schädelfragment von Canstatt,” Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, Mai 1906 (Sonderheft).Google Scholar
(12)Selenka, Emil Dr, Menschenaffen: Studien über Entwickelung und Schädelbau, zweite Lieferung, 11 Kapitel: “Schädel des Gorilla und Schimpanse,” 1899.Google Scholar
(13)Sollas, W. I., “On the Cranial and Facial Characters of the Neanderthal Race,” Phil. Trans., series B, vol. cxcix. (pp. 281339).Google Scholar
(14)Turner, Logan, The Accessory Sinuses of the Nose, Edin., 1901.Google Scholar
(15)Zuckerkandl, E., Normale und pathologische Anatomie der Nasenhöhle und ihrer pneumatischen Anhänge, 1. Band, 2. Auflage, 1893.Google Scholar