Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T14:36:23.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Westlothiana lizziae from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, and the amniote stem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

T. R. Smithson ,
R. L. Carroll ,
A. L. Panchen  and
S. M. Andrews
T. R. Smithson
Affiliation:
Cambridge Regional College, Newmarket Road, Cambridge CB5 8EG, U.K.
R. L. Carroll
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada H3A 2T5
A. L. Panchen
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
S. M. Andrews
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Westlothiana lizziae is known from the Brigantian of East Kirkton, Scotland. The skull resembles that of later amniotes in the large size of the parietal, the apparent loss of the intertemporal, and the absence of a squamosal notch, palatal fangs and labyrinthine infolding of the marginal teeth, but is primitive in the absence of a transverse flange of the pterygoid. The individual trunk vertebrae resemble those of amniotes; large intercentra are retained, but the neural arch is fused to the centrum. A surprising feature is the presence of 36 presacral vertebrae, as is the relative size of the very small but highly ossified limbs. The humerus is much shorter than the femur, but similar in configuration to that of early amniotes. There are three proximal tarsals as in primitive tetrapods, but an amniote phalangeal count. The presence of massive dorsal as well as ventral scales is a more primitive feature than that of most anthracosaurs.

Westlothiana is ‘reptiliomorph’, and is judged to be a stem-group amniote on features of the skull roof, the absence of an otic notch, the gastrocentrous vertebrae and the pedal phalangeal formula. It has not, however, reached the amniote condition in the structure of the tarsus, and the palate is more primitive than that of both early amniotes and the ‘diadectomorphs’.

Keywords

PalaeozoicCarboniferousScotlandtetrapodsamniotesEast Kirkton
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 84 , Issue 3-4: Volcanism and early terrestrial biotas , 1993 , pp. 383 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrews, S. M. & Carroll, R. L. 1991. The order Adelospondyli: Carboniferous lepospondyl amphibians. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 82, 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, D. S., Sumida, S. S. & Lombard, R. E. 1992. Reinterpretation of sutural patterns of the temporal and occipital regions in Diadectes and the relationships of diadectomorphs. J PALEONT 66, 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, A. C. & Alberch, P. 1985. The development and homologies of the chelonian carpus and tarsus. J MORPHOL 186, 119–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, R. L. 1964. The earliest reptiles. ZOOL J LINN SOC 45, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1969a. A Middle Pennsylvanian captorhinomorph and the interrelationships of primitive reptiles. J PALEONTOL 43, 151–70.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1969b. Problems of the origin of reptiles. BIOL REV 44, 393–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1970a. The ancestory of reptiles. PHILOS TRANS ROY SOC LONDON B257, 267–308.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1970b. Quantitative aspects of the origin of reptiles. FORMA FUNCTIO 3, 165–78.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1982. Early evolution of reptiles. ANN REV ECOL SYST 13, 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1991a. The origin of reptiles. In Schultze, H.-P. & Trueb, L. (Eds) Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods: controversy and consensus, 331–53. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1991b. Batropetes from the Lower Permian of Europe—a microsaur not a reptile. J VERT PALEONT 11, 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. & Baird, D. 1968. The Carboniferous amphibian Tuditanus [Eosauravus] and the distinction between microsaurs and reptiles. AM MUS NOVIT 2337, 1–50.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. & Baird, D. 1972. Carboniferous stem-reptiles of the family Romeriidae. BULL MUS COMP ZOOL 143, 321–63.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. & Gaskill, P. 1978. The Order Microsauria. MEM AM PHILOS SOC 126, 1–211.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L., Belt, E. S., Dineley, D. L., Baird, D. & McGregor, D. C. 1972. Excursion A59: Vertebrate Paleontology of Eastern Canada. 24TH INT GEOL CONGR MONTREAL 1972, 1–113.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1987. Pholiderpeton scutigerum Huxley, an amphibian from the Yorkshire Coal Measures. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B318, 1–107.Google Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1994. Silvanerpeton miripedes, a new anthracosauroid from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 369–376.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. 1990. Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. NATURE 347, 66–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. T. 1965. Microsaurs and the origin of captorhinomorph reptiles. AM ZOOL 5, 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, M. J. 1980. The Cotylosauria: a reconsideration of a group of archaic tetrapods. In Panchen, A. L. (Ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 497–551. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heaton, M. J. & Reisz, R. R. 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of captorhinomorph reptiles. CAN J EARTH SCI 23, 402–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. 1977. The osteology and musculature of the pectoral limb of small captorhinids. J MORPH 152, 101–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, R. 1980. Proterogyrinus scheelei and the early evolution of the labryinthodont pectoral girdle. In Panchen, A. L. (Ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 351–76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 1984. The Carboniferous amphibian Proterogyrinus scheelei Romer and the early evolution of tetrapods. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B306, 431–527.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 1989. The skull and axial skeleton of the Lower Permian anthracosauroid amphibian Archeria crassidisca Cope. PALAEONTOGRAPHICA A207, 161–206.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1980. Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, T. S. 1980. Origin of mammal-like reptiles. NATURE 283, 378–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, R. E. & Sumida, S. S. 1992. Recent progress in understanding early tetrapods. AMER ZOOL 32, 609–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. C. 1980. A review of the Nectridea (Amphibia). In Panchen, A. L. (Ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 377–405. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R. 1988. The relationships and origin of living amphibians. In Benton, M. J. (Ed.) The phytogeny and classification of the tetrapods. Vol. 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, 59–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A. R., Smithson, T. R., Milner, A. C., Coates, M. I. & Rolfe, W. D. I. 1986. The search for early tetrapods. MOD GEOL 10, 1–28.Google Scholar
Müller, G. B. & Alberch, P. 1990. Ontogeny of the limb skeleton in Alligator mississippiensis: developmental invariance and change in the evolution of archosaur limbs. J. MORPHOL 203, 151–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, E. C. 1962. The family Diadectidae and its bearing on the classification of reptiles. FIELDIANA GEOL 7, 2–53.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1970. Teil 5a, Anthracosauria. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1972. The interrelationships of the earliest tetrapods. In Joysey, K. A. & Kemp, T. S. (Eds) Studies in vertebrate evolution, 65–87. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1975. A new genus and species of anthracosaur amphibian from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland and the status of Pholidogaster pisciformis Huxley. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B269, 581–640.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1977. On Anthracosaurus russelli Huxley (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia) and the family Anthracosauridae. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B279, 447–512.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. 1985. On the amphibian Crassigyrinus scoticus Watson from the Carboniferous of Scotland. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B309, 505–68.Google Scholar
Panchen, A. L. & Smithson, T. R. 1988. The relationship of the earliest tetrapods. In Benton, M. J. (Ed.). The phytogeny and classification of the tetrapods. Vol. 1. Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parrington, R. 1958. The problem of the classification of reptiles. ZOOL J LINN SOC 44, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C. & Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. BULL AM MUS NAT HIST 158, 81–172.Google Scholar
Peabody, F. E. 1951. The origin of the astragalus of reptiles. EVOLUTION 5, 339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1972. Pelycosaurian reptiles from the Middle Pennsylvanian of North America. BULL MUS COMP ZOOL HARVARD 144, 27–62.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1980. The Pelycosauria: a review of phylogenetic relationships. In Panchen, A. L. (Ed.) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates, 553–91. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R. 1981. A diapsid reptile from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. SPEC PUB MUS NAT HIST UNIV KANSAS 7, 1–74.Google Scholar
Rieppel, O. 1993. Studies on skeleton formation in reptiles. IV. The homology of the reptilian (amniote) astragalus revisited. J VERT PALEON 13, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, W. D. I., Durant, G. P., Baird, W. J., Chaplin, C., Paton, R. L. & Reekie, R. J. 1994. The East Kirkton Limestone, Viséan, West Lothian, Scotland: introduction and stratigraphy, TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 177–188.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1967. Early reptilian evolution re-viewed. EVOLUTION 21, 821–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romer, A. S. & Byrne, . 1931. The pes of Diadectes: notes on a primitive limb. PALAEOBIOLOGICA 4, 24–48.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. & Price, L. I. 1940. Review of the Pelycosauria. SPEC PAP GEOL SOC AM 28, 1–538.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. H. & Alberch, P. 1986. A morphogenic approach to the origin and basic organisation of the tetrapod limb. EVOL BIOL 20, 319–387.Google Scholar
Smithson, T. R. 1985. The morphology and relationships of the Carboniferous amphibian Eoherpeton watsoni Panchen. ZOOL J LINN SOC 85, 317–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, T. R. 1989. The earliest known reptile. NATURE 314, 676–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, T. R. 1994. Eldeceeon rolfei, a new reptiliomorph from the Viséan of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH: EARTH SCI 84, 377–382.Google Scholar
Smithson, T. R. & Rolfe, W. D. I. 1990. Westlothiana gen nov.: naming the earliest known reptile. SCOTT J GEOL 26, 137–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumida, S. S., Lombard, R. E. & Berman, D. S. 1992. Morphology of the atlas axis complex of the late Paleozoic tetrapod suborders Diadectomorpha and Seymouriamorpha. PHILOS TRANS R SOC LONDON B336, 259–73.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1914. Procolophon trigoniceps, a cotylosaurian reptile from South Africa. PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON 1914, 735–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1917. A sketch classification of the pre-Jurassic tetrapod vertebrates. PROC ZOOL SOC LONDON 1917, 167–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1919. The structure, evolution and origin of the Amphibia—The ‘Orders’ Rachitomi and Stereospondyli. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B209, 1–73.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1926. The evolution and origin of the Amphibia. PHIL TRANS R SOC LONDON B214, 189–257.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1951. Paleontology and modern biology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1954. On Bolosaurus and the origin and classification of reptiles. BULL MUS COMP ZOOL HARVARD 111, 297–449.Google Scholar
Wellstead, C. F. 1982. A Lower Carboniferous aistopod amphibian from Scotland. PALAEONTOLOGY 25, 193–208.Google Scholar
Wellstead, C. F. 1991. Taxonomic revision of the Lysorophia, Permo-Carboniferous lepospondyl amphibians. BULL AM MUS NAT HIST 209, 1–90.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1939. Osteology of Seymouria baylorensis Broili. BULL MUS COMP ZOOL HARVARD 85, 323–410.Google Scholar
Williston, S. W. 1908. The oldest known reptile, Isodectes punctulatus Cope. J GEOL 16, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. P., Panchen, A. L. & Smithson, T. R. 1985. A terrestrial fauna from the Scottish Lower Carboniferous. NATURE 314, 355–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar