Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:15:14.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solute leaching in light-textured soils: prediction of solute leaching in light-textured soils using a chromatographic plate method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

A. J. A. Vinten ,
S. Yazid ,
D. B. Naysmith  and
M. E. Parkes
A. J. A. Vinten
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, U.K.
S. Yazid
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, U.K.
D. B. Naysmith
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, U.K.
M. E. Parkes
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The leaching of non-adsorbed tracer ions was studied at two field sites and in undisturbed columns. Results of field work are compared with leaching predicted using a simple chromatographic plate model. This comparison shows that in most cases less leaching than predicted occurs. This suggests that nitrate ions may be protected from leaching in field soils because of the presence of immobile water, and column experiments support this hypothesis. The extent of protection is larger than observed in other work for soils of similar texture.

Keywords

Bromidedispersionimmobile waterwater balance15N.
Type
Land use and water quality
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 78 , Issue 4: Hydrology in Scotland , 1987 , pp. 341 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addiscott, T. M. & Wagenet, R. J. 1985. Concepts of solute leaching in soils: a review of modelling approaches. J SOIL SCI 36, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, T. & Killham, K. 1986. Field evidence on nitrogen losses by denitrification. SOIL USE MANAGE 2, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, G. H. 1979. Movement of solutes in soil: principles of adsorption/exchange chromatography. In Bolt, G. H. (ed.) Soil chemistry B. Physico-chemical methods, 285–348. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, H. 1962. The diffusion model of longitudinal mixing in beds of finite length. Numerical values. CHEM ENG SCI 17, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresler, E. 1967. A model for tracing salt distribution in the soil profile and estimating the efficient combination of water quality and quantity under varying field conditions. SOIL SCI 104, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, I. G. 1975. An equation to predict the leaching of surface applied nitrate. J AGRIC SCI, CAMBRIDGE 85, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, I. G. 1976. Equations to predict the leaching of nitrate uniformly incorporated to a known depth or uniformly distributed throughout a soil profile. J AGRIC SCI, CAMBRIDGE 86, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, K. C. & Wild, A. 1982. Prediction of solute leaching under field conditions. An appraisal of three methods. J SOIL SCI 33, 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, E. 1972. Mineral Nutrition of Plants. New York, London, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Henriksen, A. & Selmer-Olsen, A. R. 1970. Automatic methods for determining nitrate and nitrite in water and soil extracts. ANALYST 95, 514–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, J. O. & Stanford, G. 1967. Utilisation of soil and fertilizer N by oats in relation to the available N status of soils. PROC SOIL SCI SOC AM 31, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeteson, J. J., Greenwood, D. J. & Habets, E. J. M. H. 1985. Dependence of soil mineral N on N fertilizer application. PLANT SOIL 91, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passioura, J. B. 1971. Hydrodynamic dispersion in aggregated media. I. Theory. SOIL SCI 111, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van, der Pol R. M. P., Wierenga, P. J. & Nielsen, D. R. 1977. Solute movement in a field soil. J SOIL SCI SOC AM 41, 10–13.Google Scholar
Rose, C. W., Chichester, F. W., Williams, J. R. & Ritchie, J. T. 1982. Application of an approximate analytic method of computing solute profiles with dispersion in soils. J ENV QUAL 11, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. A., Elmes, A. E., Howard, R. S. & Franklin, M. F. 1984. The uptake of soil and fertilizer-nitrogen by barley growing under Scottish climatic conditions. PLANT SOIL 76, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. P. & Douglas, H. A. 1975. Theoretical considerations of the water loss by evaporation from bare soil and the effect of partial crop cover. ADAS QUART REV 16, 135–144.Google Scholar
Smith, S. J. & Davis, R. J. 1974. Relative movement of bromide and nitrate through soils. J ENV QUAL 3, 152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. J., Ahuja, L. R. & Ross, J. D. 1984. Leaching of a soluble chemical under field crop conditions. J SOIL SCI SOC AM 48, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W. & Swoboda, A. R. 1970. Anion exclusion effects on chloride movement in soils. SOIL SCI 110, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, A. & Babiker, I. A. 1976. Winter leaching of nitrate at sites in Southern England. MAFF TECH BULL 32, 153–196. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar