Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:52:17.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IX.—Two New Genera of Coccosteid Arthrodira from the Middle Old Red Sandstone of Scotland, and their Stratigraphical Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

R. S. Miles  and
T. S. Westoll
R. S. Miles
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, King's College in theUniversity of Durham, Newcastle upon Tyne.
T. S. Westoll
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, King's College in theUniversity of Durham, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Material of a coccosteid fish, from various localities in Caithness, is described as Dickosteus threiplandi n.g., n.sp. The fish has previously been confused with Coccosteus cuspidatus Miller ex Ag. ( = Coccosteus decipiens Ag.). A diagnosis of this new form is given and comparisons made with Coccosteus show that it is quite distinct. Coccosteus fletti Watson is also redescribed and referred to the new genus Watsonosteus. The phylogenetic relations and stratigraphical distribution of these two genera are considered, and it is shown that Dickosteus occurs in Caithness in the Thurso Flagstone Group above the Achanarras horizon, apparently replacing Coccosteus, and has a similar range in Orkney. Watsonosteus is characteristic of the Eday Flags. The stratigraphy of the Thurso Flagstone Group is critically reviewed and compared with the Orkney succession; the Ackergill Beds are shown to be the probable lateral equivalents of the Mey Beds, and the consequences of this are examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 65 , Issue 9 , 1962 , pp. 179 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Case, E. C., 1931. “Arthrodiran Remains from the Devonian of Michigan”, Contr. Mus. Palæont. Univ. Mich., 3, 163–182.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M., 1893. “New or Rare Species of Fossils from the Horizons of the Livonia Salt Shaft”, Rep. N.Y. St. Geol., 2, 162–168.Google Scholar
Crampton, C. B., and Carruthers, R. G., 1914. “The Geology of Caithness”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Denison, R. H., 1958. “Early Devonian Fishes from Utah, Part III. Arthrodira”, Fieldiana, Geol., 11, 461–551.Google Scholar
Eastman, C. R., 1906. “Devonic Fishes of the New York Formations”, Mem. N.Y. St. Mus., 10, 1–235.Google Scholar
Sir Flett, J. S., 1897. “On the Discovery in Orkney of the John o' Groats Horizon of the Old Red Sandstone”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., 13, 255–257.Google Scholar
Sir Flett, J. S., 1898. “The Old Red Sandstone of the Orkneys”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 39, 383–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, W., 1932. “Die Arthrodira Wildungens”, Geol. Paläont. Abh., 19, 1–61.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1933. “Die unterdevonischen Fische und Gigantostraken von Overath”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 145, 41–77.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1937. “Die Wirbeltiere des rheinischen Devons II“, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 176, 5–83.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1931. “Revision of the Structure of Coccosteus decipiens Ag.”, Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 12, 291–313.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1932. “The Structure of Dinichthys. A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Arthrodira”, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bashford Dean Mem. Vol., 4, 115–224.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1933. “Some Remarks about the Structure of Phlyctœnaspis acadica Whiteaves”, Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 14, 127–144.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1934. “Revision of the Esthonian Arthrodira. Part I. Family Homostiidœ, Jaekel”, Arch. Naturk. Estlands, 10, 177–290.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1938. “Notes on Arthrodira”, Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 18, 1–27.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E., 1948. “On the Morphology and Taxonomy of the Middle Devonian Osteolepid Fishes of Scotland”, K. Svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., 25, 1–301.Google Scholar
Kulczycki, J., 1957. “Upper Devonian Fishes from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland)”, Acta Palæont. Polon., 2, 285–380.Google Scholar
Lehman, J. P., 1956. “Les Arthrodires du Dévonien Supérieur du Tafilalet (Sud marocain)”, Notes Sen. Min. Maroc, 129, 1–70.Google Scholar
M'coy, F., 1855. “Description of the British Palæozoic Fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge”, in Sedgwick, A., A Synopsis of the Classification of the British Palæozoic Rocks. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miles, R. S., 1962. “Gemuendenaspis n.gen., an Arthrodiran Fish from the Lower Devonian Hunsrückschiefer of Germany”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 65, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obruchev, D. V., 1931. “Über Coccosteus trautscholdi (Eastman)”, Moscow Acad. Sci. URSS, Mus. Geol., 8, 285–310.Google Scholar
Obruchev, D. V., 1934. “Über zwei Coccosteus-Funde in der Sowiet-Arktis und den Umfang der Gattung Coccosteus”, Trans. Arct. Inst. Leningr., 13, 185–190.Google Scholar
Obrucheva, O. P., 1954. “On the Genus Plourdosteus (Arthrodira) in the Upper Devonian of the U.S.S.R.”, C.R. Acad. Sci. URSS., 96, 1055–1056. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Obrucheva, O. P., 1959. “Two Species of Plourdosteus (Arthrodira) from the Upper Devonian of the U.S.S.R.”, Paleont. Zh., 3, 78–94. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Ørvig, T., 1951. “Histologic Studies of Placoderms and fossil Elasmobranchs. I. The Endoskeleton, with Remarks on the Hard Tissues of Lower Vertebrates in General”, Ark. Zool., 2, 321–454.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T., 1957. “Remarks on the Vertebrate Fauna of the Lower Upper Devonian of Escuminac Bay, P.Q., Canada, with Special Reference to the Porolepiform Crossopterygians”, Ark. Zool., 10, 367–426.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T., 1960. “New Finds of Acanthodians, Arthrodires, Crossopterygians, Ganoids and Dipnoans in the Upper Middle Devonian Calcareous Flags (Oberer Plattenkalk) of the Bergisch Gladbach-Paffrath Trough. Part I”, Paläont. Z., 34, 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. E., 1946. “The Genera of Fossil Conchostraca—an Order of Bivalved Crustacea”, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoöl. Harv., 96, 217–307.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. A., 1959. “On the Pectoral Fin and Shoulder Girdle of the Arthrodires”, K. Svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., 8, 1–229.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1888. “Notes on the Nomenclature of the Fishes of the Old Red Sandstone of Great Britain”, Geol. Mag., 5, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1931. “On Three New Species of Fish from the Old Red Sandstone of Orkney and Shetland”, Summ. Progr. Geol Surv. Lond., 1931, 157–156.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1934. “The Interpretation of Arthordires”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1934, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1945. “The Paired Fins of Placoderms”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1951. “The Vertebrate-bearing Strata of Scotland”, Int. Geol. Congr., 1948, 18, II, 5–20.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1958. “The Lateral Fin-fold Theory and the Pectoral Fins of Ostracoderms and Early Fishes”, in Studies on Fossil Vertebrates. London.Google Scholar
White, E. I., 1952. “Australian Arthrodires”, Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol., 1, 251–304.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. V., 1935. “The Geology of the Orkneys”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1891. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum of Natural History, 2. London.Google Scholar