Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:51:33.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—Inheritance of Resistance to Two Strains of Blight (Phytophthora infestans de Bary) in Potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

William Black
William Black
Affiliation:
Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Corstorphine, Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The existence in Mexico of blight-resistant species of potato has been known for many years, but they occur in the wild and are quite unsuitable for agricultural purposes. In order to utilise their resistance to disease it is necessary to combine disease resistance with the cropping qualities of cultivated forms while eliminating the undesirable characters which are prominent in the wild forms. Breeding work with this object in view has been in progress at the Scottish Plant Breeding Station for several years, and results obtained in the course of testing progenies for reaction to blight infection are discussed in the following pages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , 1944 , pp. 137 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Beaumont, A., 1934. “On the relation between the stage of development of the potato crop and the incidence of blight (Phytophthora infestans),” Ann. Appl. Biol., xxi, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, C. L., 1939. “Inheritance Studies in the Interspecific Cross Solanum demissum Lindl. × S. tuberosum L.,” Journ. Agric. Res., LIX, 23–39.Google Scholar
Cadman, C. H., 1942. “Autotetraploid inheritance in the potato: some new evidence,” Journ. Genet., XLIV, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhueri, H. C., 1943. “Cytological studies in the genus Solanum. I. Wild and Native-cultivated ‘diploid’ Potatoes,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., LXI, pp. 113–135.Google Scholar
Crosier, W., 1933. “Culture of Phytophthora infestans,” Phytopath., XXIII, 713–720.Google Scholar
Crosier, W., 1934. “Studies in the biology of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary,” Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoirs, CLV, 1–40.Google Scholar
Ellison, W., 1935. “A study of the chromosome numbers and morphology in certain British varieties of the common cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.),” Genetica, XVII, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, W., 1936 a. “Meiosis and fertility in certain British varieties of the cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.),” Genetica, XVIII, 217–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, W., 1936 b. “Synapsis and sterility in a Solanum hybrid,” Journ. Genet., XXXII, 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emme, E. K., 1936. (Triploid hybrids of the species of Solanum Antipoviczii Buk. sp. coll. which are immune from Phytophthora), Biologiceskii Zurnal (Biologichesky Zhurnal), v, 901–914.Google Scholar
Juzepczuk, S. W., and Bukasov, S. M., 1929. (A contribution to the question of the origin of the potato.) Trudy Vsesouizn. S'ezda Gen. i. Selek. (U.S.S.R. Cong. Plant and Animal Breed. Proc), III, 593–691.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W. J. C., 1929. “The genetics and cytology of Dahlia species,” Journ. Genet., XXI, 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, W. J. C., 1931. “The genetics and cytology of Dahlia variabilis,” Journ. Genet., XXIV, 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H., 1937. “Das heutige Ausgangsmaterial für die Züchtung Phytophthora-widerstandsfahiger Kartoffeln (Unter Berücksichtigung der bisher aufgetretenen Biotypen von P. infestans de Bary),” Züchter, IX, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H., 1938. “Ein weiterer Beitrag zum Problem der physiologischen Spezialisierung von Phytophthora infestans de Bary, dem Erreger der Kartoffelkrautfäule,” Phytopath. Zeitschr., XI, 121–154.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H., 1941. “Untersuchungen über die Genetik und Physiologie der Resistenz der Kartofiel gegen Phytophthora infestans de Bary. Die genetische - Analyse der Resistenz von Solanum demissum sp. (vorl. Mitteilung),” Züchter, XIII, 33–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longley, A. E., and Clark, C. F., 1930. “Chromosome behaviour and pollen production in the potato,” Journ. Agric. Res., XLI, 867–888.Google Scholar
Lunden, A. P., 1937. “Arvelighetsundersøkelser i potet” (Inheritance studies in the potato), Meld. Norg. Landbr. Høisk., XVII, 1–156.Google Scholar
McClintock, B., and Hill, H. E., 1931. “The cytological identification of the chromosome associated with the R.G. linkage group in Zea Mays,” Genetics, XVI, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurman, O., and Rancken, G., 1932. “Untersuchungen über die Chromosomenverhältnisse bei kultivierten Kartofielsorten (Solanum tuberosum L.),” Soc. Sci. Fenn. Comm. Biol., III, 1–27.Google Scholar
Mills, W. R., 1938. “The influence of maturity of potato varieties upon their susceptibility to late blight,” Amer. Pot. Journ., xv, 319–325.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., 1930. “Ueber die Phytophthoraresistenz der Kartoffel und ihre Vererbung (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der Polyploidie bei der Kartoffel),” Angew. Bot., XII, 299–324.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., 1941. “Physiologisch-genetisch Untersuchungen zur Analyse der Phytophthora-Resistenz der Kartoffel,” Proc. VIIth Int. Genet. Congr., Edinburgh, 1939, pp. 222–223.Google Scholar
Müller, K. O., and Börger, H., 1941. “Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Phytophthora-Resistenz der Kartoffelzugleich ein Beitrag zum Problem der ‘erworbenen Resistenz’ im Pflanzenreich,” Arb. Biol. Reichanst. Land-u.-Forstiv., Berlin, XXIII, 189–231.Google Scholar
Müntzing, A., 1933. “Studies on meiosis in diploid and triploid Solanum tuberosum L.,” Hereditas, XVII, 223–245.Google Scholar
O'Conner, C., 1933. “Potato breeding and resistance to blight,” Gard. Chron., XCIII, 104–105.Google Scholar
Pethybridge, G. H., 1910. “Potato diseases in Ireland,” Journ. Dept. Agric. and Tech. Instr., Ireland, x, 241–256.Google Scholar
Puskarev, I. I., 1937. (The new blight-resistant potato variety 8670.) Novoe v Sel'skom Khozjaistve (What is new in agriculture), published by Sel'khozgig, Moscow, VI, 46.Google Scholar
Reddick, D., 1934. “Elimination of potato late blight from North America,” Phytopath., XXIV, 555–557.Google Scholar
Reddick, D., and Crosier, W., 1933. “Biological specialisation in Phytophthora infestans,” Amer. Pot. Journ., x, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddick, D., and Mills, W., 1938. Building up virulence in Phytophthora infestans,” Amer. Pot. Journ., xv, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaman, R. N., 1928. “Abnormal segregation in families arising from the cross Solanum utile × Solanum tuberosum (with a cytological analysis by Mary Adams),” Verhand. V Int. Kongr. vererbungswiss, Berlin, 1927, pp. 1230–1239.Google Scholar
Salaman, R. N., 1941. “Breeding for immunity to blight and other diseases in the potato,” Proc. VIIth Int. Genet. Congr., Edinburgh, 1939, pp. 253–254.Google Scholar
Schick, R., 1932. “Über das Verhalten von Solanum demissum, Solanum tuberosum und ihren Bastarden gegenüber verschiedenen Herkünften von Phytophthora infestans,” Züchter, IV, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, R., and Lehmann, H., 1936. “Zur Physiologischen Spezialisierung von Phytophthora infestans de Bary. Zugelich ein Beitrag zur Methodik der Züchtung krautfaülewiderstandsfähiger Kartoffeln,” Züchter, VIII, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, R., and Schaper, P., 1936. “Das Verhalten von verschiedenen Formen von Solanum demissum gegenuber 4 verschiedenen Linien der Phytophthora infestans, Züchter, VIII, 65–70, 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepeleva, E. M., 1937. (The morphology of the chromosomes of certain species of the potato), C.R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci., V.S.S.R., xv, 207–209.Google Scholar