Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:59:33.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—The Scottish Carboniferous Crinoidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

James Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This memoir is the result of over thirty-nine years' work among the crinoids of the Scottish Carboniferous limestones. When I began the systematic collection of these fossils few records were noted in any publications dealing with Scottish geology, and in our national museums such as those of Edinburgh and Glasgow there were, and still are, comparatively few species represented. In the official memoirs of the Scottish Geological Survey, dealing with typical Carboniferous counties like Fife and the Lothians, little more than a dozen species are recorded. Some, if not most, of these records are of doubtful value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , 1941 , pp. 1 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Anderson, E. M., 1936. Catalogue of Types and Figured Specimens of Fossils in the Geological Survey Collections now Exhibited in the Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh, H.M. Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, J., 1840. In Leighton and Swan's History of Fife, chapter on the geology of the county, vol. i, p. 219 and accompanying plate.Google Scholar
Annual Register, 1760. Article extracted from Scots Magazine under initials “J. M.,” “Some Observations on our Limestone Quarries,” p. 98.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J., Young, J., and Robertson, D., 1876. Catalogue of the Western Scottish Fossils, p. 41, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Austin, T. and T., , 1843–1848. Monograph on Recent and Fossil Crinoidea, London and Bristol.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. H., 1875. Figures of Characteristic British Fossils, London.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1900. In Lankester's Zoology, vol. iii, Echinoderma, London.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1912. “Notes on Hydreionocrinus ,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. x, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1912. “Tapering Ends of Crinoid Stems from Roscobie,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. x, p. 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1916–1917. “ Hydreionocrinus verrucosus n. sp., Carboniferous, Isle of Man,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. xvi, p. 203.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A., 1916–1917. “Some British Specimens of Ulocrinus ,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. xvi, p. 207.Google Scholar
Brown, T., 1860. “Notes on the Mountain Limestone and Lower Carboniferous Rocks of the Fifeshire Coast, from Burntisland to St Andrews,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxiii, p. 385.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. H., and Etheridge, R. jun., 1881. “On Allagecrinus, the Representative of a New Family from the Carboniferous Limestone Series of Scotland,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. vii, April, p. 281, pls. xv and xvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, P., 1841. “On the Dunfermline Coalfield,” Trans. Highl. Soc., vol. xiii, p. 298.Google Scholar
Chalmers, P., 1844. History of Dunfermline, p. 57.Google Scholar
Chalmers, P., 1845. In Statistical Account of Scotland, p. 839.Google Scholar
Cumberland, G., 1826. Reliquiœ Conservatœ, etc., Bristol.Google Scholar
De Koninck, L. G., 1858. “On Two New Genera of British Palæozoic Crinoids,” Geologist, no. 4, April, and no. 5, May; and Bull. Acad. Roy. Bruxelles, pt. ii, p. 17, pl. 2.Google Scholar
De Koninck, L. G., and Le Hon, H., 1854. “Recherches sur les Crinoides du Terrain Carbonifere de la Belgique,” Mém. Acad. Roy. Belg., vol. xxii, pp. 1–208, with supplementary paper on Woodocrinus.Google Scholar
De Koninck, L. G., and Wood, E., 1857. “On the Genus Woodocrinus ,” Brit. Assoc. Report, pp. 76–78, and Geologist, vol. i, no. 1, pp. 12–15, pls. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. jun., 1879. “Observations on the Swollen Condition of Carboniferous Crinoid Stems,” Proc. Nat. Hist. Soc. Glasgow, vol. iv, p. 19.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. jun., 1892. “A Monograph of the Permo-Carboniferous Invertebrata of New South Wales,” pt. ii, “Echinodermata,” etc., Mem. Geol. Surv. N.S.W., Palæontology, no. 5, pp. 82–97, pls. xii–xxi.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B., 1846. Grundriss der Versteinerungskunde, Dresden and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1900. “The Geology of Central and Western Fife and Kinross-shire,” p. 222.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1902. “The Geology of East Fife,” p. 361.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1910. “The Geology of East Lothian,” p. 207.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1910. “The Geology of the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh,” p. 389.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1921. “The Country around Pembroke and Tenby,” by Dixon, E. E. L..Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1930. “The Economic Geology of the Ayrshire Coalfields,” Area III, pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
Geological Survey Memoirs, 1934. “Economic Geology of the Fife Coalfields,” Area II, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Grenfell, J. G., 1876. “Notes on Carboniferous Encrinites from Clifton and Lancashire,” Proc. Bristol Nat. Soc., vol. i, p. 476.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1898, for 1897. Zeits. deutsch. geol. Gesell., vol. xlix, p. 47.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1895. “Beitrage zur Kenntnis der palaeozoischen Crinoiden Deutschlands,” Palaeont. Abhandl. Jena, Neue Folge, vol. iii.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., 1930. “ Trophocrinus, a New Carboniferous Crinoid Genus,” Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. xx, no. 11, p. 210.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., 1936. “A New Allagecrinus from Oklahoma,” Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. xxvi, no. 4.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., 1937. “ Eupachycrinus and related Carboniferous Crinoid Genera,” Journ. Palæontology, vol. ii, no. 7, pp. 598–607, pl. 84.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., 1938. “Five New Genera of Carboniferous Crinoidea Inadunata,” Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. xxviii, no. 4, pp. 158–172.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., 1933. “The Stratigraphy and Palæontology of the Gilmore City Formation of Iowa,” University of Iowa Studies, vol. xv, no. 2.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Beane, B. H., 1937. “The Crinoid Fauna of the Hampton Formation at Le Grand, Iowa,” University of Iowa Studies, vol. xvii, no. 6.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. P., 1930. “The Avonian Succession in the South of the Isle of Man,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxxvi, p. 234.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1849. “Palæozoic Echinodermata,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., April.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1854. Contributions to British Palæontology: Echinodermata, p. 105, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1855 (with A. Sedgwick). British Palæozoic Rocks and Fossils, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1862. A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Fossils of Ireland, London.Google Scholar
Macgregor, M., 1928–1929. “Scottish Carboniferous Stratigraphy,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. xviii, p. 442.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H., 1866 onwards. “Geol. Surv. of Illinois,” Palæontology, vols. ii–viii.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S., 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea, etc., Bristol.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., 1889. North American Geology and Palæontology, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E., 1890. “Descriptions of some New Genera and Species of Echinodermata,” Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. xiii, pp. 1–59, pls. 1–10.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E., 1893–1897. Illinois State Mus. Nat. Hist., Bull., Nos. 3, 4, 6–12.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Plummer, F. S., 1937. “Upper Carboniferous Crinoids from the Morrow Subseries of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas,” Denison Univ. Bull., Journ. Sci. Lab., vol. xxxii, December, pp. 209–313, pls. xii–xvi.Google Scholar
Morris, J., 1843. A Catalogue of British Fossils, London.Google Scholar
Nicol, J., 1844. Guide to the Geology of Scotland, p. 109.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D., 1926. “The Faunal Succession in the Carboniferous Limestone and Bowland Shales at Clitheroe and Pendle Hill,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lxxxii, p. 188.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D., 1936. “The Carboniferous Succession in the Slaidburn District, Yorkshire,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xcii, p. 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, J., 1820. Organic Remains of a Former World, London.Google Scholar
Peck, R. E., 1935. “Growth Stages of Allagecrinus americanus Rowley,” Journ. Geol., vol. xliii, No. 7, p. 765.Google Scholar
Peck, R. E., 1936. “Lower Mississippian Micro-Crinoids of the Kinderhook and Osage Groups of Missouri,” Journ. Palæontology, vol. x, no. 4, p. 282.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., 1836. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, pt. ii, London.Google Scholar
Portlock, J. E., 1843. Geological Report of Londonderry and parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh, Dublin.Google Scholar
Pratt, A., 1876. “Notes on Crinoids from Invertiel, Fifeshire,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. vi, p. 25.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. E., 1865. “Geological Notes on the Mountain Limestone of England,” Geol. Mag., vol. ii, p. 163.Google Scholar
Rofe, J., 1865. “Notes on Echinodermata from the Mountain Limestone,” Geol. Mag., vol. ii, p. 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. Von, 1822–1823. Nachtrage zur Petrefactenkunde, Gotha.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. E., 1930. “Die Echinodermen des deutschen Unterkarbons,” Jahrb. Preus. Geol. Landesanst., vol. cxxii, pp. 1–90.Google Scholar
Sladen, W. J., 1878. “On the genus Poteriocrinus and Allied Forms,” Proc. West Riding Geol. Polytech. Soc., N.S., vol. i, p. 242.Google Scholar
Smith, J., 1904. “The Geology and Palæontology of the Clyde Drainage Area,” Brit. Assoc. Handbook, Glasgow, "Echinodermata,” p. 509.Google Scholar
Smith, J., 1911. “Carboniferous Limestone Rocks of the Isle of Man,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. xiv, p. 119.Google Scholar
Smyth, L. B., 1930. “The Carboniferous Rocks of Hook Head, Co. Wexford,” Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., vol. xxxix, B, no. 26, p. 523.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J., 1900. “On Brahmacrinus ponderosus and Cicerocrinus elegans ,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lvi, p. 264.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1911. “Some New American Fossil Crinoids,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xxv, no. 3, pp. 117–161, pls. i–vi.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1920. “The Crinoidea Flexibilia,” Smithsonian Inst. Washington, publ. No. 2501.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1923. “On the Fossil Family Catillocrinidœ,” Smithsonian Inst. Washington, publ. No. 2718.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1926. “Unusual Forms of Fossil Crinoids,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. lxvii, art. 9.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., 1938. A Group of Crinoids from the Pennsylvanian of North-eastern Oklahoma, privately printed, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Trautschold, R., 1867. “Einige Crinoideen und Andere Thierreste Jungeren Bergkalks im Gouvernement Moskau,” Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou. Google Scholar
Trautschold, R., 1879. “Die Kalkbruche von Myatachkowa, Eine Monographie des oberon Bergkalks,” Nouv. Mém. Soc. Nat. Moscou, vol. xiv, pp. 101–180, pls. xii–xviii.Google Scholar
Ure, D., 1793. History of Rutherglen and East Kilbride, pp. 323–327, pls. xvii and xviii, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1879–1886. “Revision of the Palæocrinoidæ,” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, pt. i, 1879, pp. 226–376; pt. ii, 1881, pp. 177–411; pt. iii, 1895, pp. 225–364; and 1886, pp. 64–226.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1879. “North American Crinoidea Camerata,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vols. xx and xxi with atlas.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1916. “Die Permischen Echinodermen von Timor,” I Teil, Palaeontologie von Timor, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1924. Die Permischen Krinoiden von Timor, II, The Hague.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1929. “Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Permischen Echinodermen von Timor,” I, Allagecrinus, etc., Wetehschappelijke Mededeelingen, no. 11.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1930. “Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Permischen Echinodermen von Timor,” III, Hypocrinus, Paracatillocrinus und Allagecrinus dux, Wetenschappelijke Mededeelingen, No. 13.Google Scholar
Wanner, J., 1937. “Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Permischen Echinodermen von Timor,” VIII–XIII, Sonder-Abdruck aus Palaeontographica, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Weller, J. Marvin, 1930. “A Group of Larviform Crinoids from Pennsylvanian Strata of the Eastern Interior Basin,” Illinois State Geol. Surv., Report of Investigations, no. 21, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
Wetherby, A. G., 1880. “Descriptions of New Crinoids from the Cincinnati Group of the Lower Silurian and Sub-Carboniferous of Kentucky,” Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., (4), pp. 245–253, pl. xvi.Google Scholar
Wood, E., 1909. “A Critical Summary of Troost's Unpublished Manuscript of the Crinoids of Tennessee,” Smithsonian Inst. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull., 64.Google Scholar
Wood, W., 1887. The East Neuk of Fife, 2nd ed. Google Scholar
Worthen, A. H., Meek, F. E., Miller, S. A., Wachsmuth, C., Barris, W. H., and Springer, F., 1866–1890. “Palæontology of Illinois,” in Geol. Surv. Illinois, vols. ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, and viii.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1912. “On the Crinoids from the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of Invertiel, Fife,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. x, p. 49, pls. v-vii.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1914. “Additions to the Fauna of the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of Leslie and St Monans, Fife,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. x, p. 132.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1914. “On the Occurrence of Crinoids in the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of Fife,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. x, p. 148, pls. xviii-xxi.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1917–1918. “On Carboniferous Crinoids from Fife, with Notes on Some Localities and Provisional Lists of Species,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. xvi, p. 364, pls. xiii-xix.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (with Tait, D.), 1923. “Notes on the Structure and Relationship of the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of St Monans, Fife,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. xi, p. 165.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1923. “ Artichthyocrinus, n.g. a Flexible Crinoid from the Carboniferous Limestones of Fife,” Geol. Mag., vol. lx, pp. 481–490.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1924. “A Woodocrinus Fauna from the Scottish Border,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxi, pp. 270–279, pls. xiii-xvi.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1925. “Notes on the Occurrence of Crinoids in the Carboniferous Limestones in Scotland,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. xi, p. 275, pls. xxvi-xxix.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1926. “Notes on the Anal Plates of Eupachycrinus calyx and Zeacrinus konincki ,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxiii, pp. 145–164, pls. xv-xvii.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1927. “Some Variations in Ulocrinus and Hydreionocrinus ,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxiv, pp. 353–372.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1928. “A Rare Euryocrinus from the Carboniferous Limestone of Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxv, pp. 246–254.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1932. “The Scottish Species of Allagecrinus ,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxix, pp. 337–366, pls. xxiii-xxv.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1933. “Two New Crinoids from the Scottish Carboniferous Limestones, with Notes on the Allagecrinidce ,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxx, pp. 193–208, pls. xiii-xiv.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1934. “New Scottish and Irish Fossil Crinoids,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxi, pp. 241–268, pls. xiii-xv.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1935. “New Crinoids from Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe, with Lists of Carboniferous Limestone Crinoid Species,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxii, pp. 193–213, pls. vii-ix.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1936. “New Scottish Carboniferous Crinoids,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxiii, pp. 385–412, pls. vii-x.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1937. “Scottish Carboniferous Crinoids,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxiv, pp. 385–411, pls. xiii-xvi.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1938. “Some British Platycrinidœ and Descriptions of New Species,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxv, pp. 266–287, pls. viii-xi.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1938. “ Anemetocrinus, n.g. a Five-armed Poteriocrinid from the Lower Carboniferous Limestones of Scotland,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxv, pp. 337–346, pls. xiii-xiv.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, N., 1927. “Deux Nouveaux des Crinoides (Poteriocrinidœ) du Palæozoique Superieur du pays de la Petschora,” Trav. Mus. Géol. Acad. Sci. l'URSS., vol. iii.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, N., 1927. “Faune des Echinodermes du Permo-carbonifere de l'Oural a Krasnooufimsk,” II, Bull. Com. Géol., vol. xlvi, pp. 181–191, pl. vi.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, N., 1930. “Faune des Echinodermes du Permo-Carbinifére de l'Oural a Krasnooufimsk,” III, Izv.-Gl. Géol.-Razv. Upr. vol. xlix.Google Scholar