Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T05:34:52.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—The Proboscis and Oesophagus of Some British Turrids*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Edmund H. Smith
Edmund H. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, and the Marine Station, Millport.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Haller (1888), one of the first to publish an account of the alimentary tract in the Gastropoda, was followed by Amaudrut (1898) who produced a detailed comparative account of “La partie anteriéure du tube digestif” in a number of gastropods. Later workers have either studied the complete alimentary system in one or two gastropods (Herrick 1906; Dakin 1912) or have been concerned with the functional morphology of particular organs, such as the oesophagus, stomach, (Graham 1941; 1949), and proboscis (Alpers 1931; Carriker 1943). Much of this scattered work has been collected by Fretter and Graham (1962). Effectively nothing is known about the functional morphology of the alimentary tract in many groups, including the neogastropod families Turridae, Terebridae, and Volutidae. This account of the proboscis and oesophagus forms part of a general study of the functional morphology of the Turridae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , 1967 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Alpers, F., 1931. “Zur Kenntnis der Anatomie von Conus lividus Brug., besondes des Darmkanak”, Jena Z.. Naturw, 65, 587–658.Google Scholar
Alpers, F., 1932. “Zur Biologie des Conus mediterraneus Brug.”, Jena Z. Naturw., 67, 346–363.Google Scholar
Amaudrut, A., 1898. “La partie antérieure du tube digestif et la torsion chez les mollusques gastéropodes”, Annls Sci. Nat. (Zool.), 8, 1–291.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R., 1943. “On the structure and function of the proboscis in the common oyster drill Urosalpinx cinerea Say”, J. Morph., 73, 441–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakin, W. J., 1912. “Buccinum”, L. M.B.C. Mem. Typ. Br. Mar. Pl. Anim., 20, and Proc. Trans. L'pool Biol. Soc., 26, 253–367.Google Scholar
Franc, A., 1952. “Notes ecologiques et anatomiques sur Philibertia purpurea (Montagu) (Moll., Ctenobr.)”, Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat., Paris, 24, 302–305.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. and Graham, A., 1962. “British Prosobranch Molluscs”, Roy Soc. Publs, 144.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1941. “The oesophagus of the stenoglossan prosobranchs”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 61, 1–23.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1949. “The molluscan stomach”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 61, 737–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, B., 1888. “Die Morphologie der Prosobranchier, gesammelt auf einer Erdumsegelung durch die Konig. Italienische Korvette Vettor Pisani”, Morph. Jb., 14, 54–169.Google Scholar
Hermitte, L. C. D., 1946. “Venomous marine molluscs of the genus Conus”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 39, 485–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrick, J. C., 1906. “Mechanism of the odontophoral apparatus in Syncotypus canaliculatus”, Am. Nat., 40, 707–737.Google Scholar
Jaeckel, S., 1952. “Uber Vergiftungen durch Conus-Arten (Gastr. Pros.) mit einem Beiträg zur Morphologie und Physiologie ihres Giftapparates”, Zool. Anz., 149, 206–216.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. J., 1956. “Piscivoros gastropods of the genus Conus”, Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 42, 168–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, A. J., 1959. “The ecology of Conus in Hawaii”, Ecol. Monogr., 29, 47–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, E. and Marcus, E., 1960. “On Hastula cinerea”, Bolm Fac. Filos. Ciênc. Univ. S. Paulo (Zool.), 23, 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G., 1955. “Use of propylene phenoxetol as a relaxing agent”, Nature, Lond., 175, 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G., 1959. “A new method for staining connective tissue fibres, with a note on Lang's method for nerve fibres”, Q. Jl Microsc. Sci., 100, 421–424.Google Scholar
Pearce, J., 1966. “On Lora trevelliana (Turton) (Gastropoda; Turridae)”, Ophelia, 3, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risbec, J., 1955. “Considerations sur l'anatomie comparé et la classification des Gastéropodes Prosobranches”, J. Conch., Paris, 95, 54–82.Google Scholar
Robinson, E., 1960. “Observations on the toxoglossan gastropod Mangelia branchystoma (Phillippi)”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 135, 319–338.Google Scholar
Shaw, H. O. N., 1915. “On the anatomy of Conus tulipa, Linn., and Conus textile, Linn.”, Q. Jl Microsc. Sci., 60, 1–60.Google Scholar
Smith, E. H., 1967. “Two new species of British turrids”, Veliger. [In press.]Google Scholar