Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:16:04.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—Polychæta of the family Nereidæ, collected by the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition (1902–1904).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

L. N. G. Ramsay
L. N. G. Ramsay
Affiliation:
Carnegie Research Scholar, Christ's College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The collection of Nereidæ brought home by the Scotia proves to be of considerable interest. As other expeditions have indicated, the family is but poorly represented in the antarctic or sub-antarctic regions; and although a large number of specimens were collected at the South Orkney Islands, these have all proved to belong to one species, N. kerguelensis M'Int. No nereids were obtained at any of the deep-water stations farther south—the family being decidedly littoral in its range.

The chief interest, however, lies in the material collected so assiduously throughout the vessel's wanderings. Six other species were obtained, including one from the Falkland Islands, hitherto undescribed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 1914 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Benham, W. B., Report on the Polychæta of the Sub-antarctic Islands of New Zealand, Wellington, 1909.Google Scholar
(2)Ehlers, E., “Florida-Anneliden,” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xv., 1887.Google Scholar
(3)Ehlers, E., Polychäten der Hamburger Magalhaensischen Sammelreise, Hamburg, 1897.Google Scholar
(4)Ehlers, E., “Die Polychäten des magellanischen und chilenischen Strandes,” Festschr. K. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, 1901.Google Scholar
(5)Ehlers, E., “Neuseeländische Anneliden,” Abhandl. K. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-phys. Kl., N.F., iii., 1904.Google Scholar
(6)Ehlers, E., “Bodensässigen Anneliden,” Wiss. Ergebn. d. Deutschen Tiefsee-Exped., XVI. i., Jena, 1908.Google Scholar
(7)Gravier, CH., “Annélides Polychètes de la mer Rouge,” Nouv. Arch. Mus. d'hist. nat., Paris, 4° série, ii. et iii., 1900–1901.Google Scholar
(8)Gravier, CH., “Annélides Polychètes recueillies à Payta 〈Péru〉,” Arch. Zool. Paris, Sér. 4, x., 1909.Google Scholar
(9)Kinberg, J. G. H., “Annulata Nova,” Öfvers. af K. Sv. Vetensk. Akad. Förh., 1865.Google Scholar
(10)M'Intosh, W. C., “Polychæta,” Sci. Results, H.M.S. Challenger; Zool., xii., London, 1885.Google Scholar
(11)M'Intosh, W. C., The British Annelids, II, i. and ii., The Ray Society, London, 1910.Google Scholar
(12)Marenzeller, E. Von, “Polychäten der Grundes-Exp. S.M.S. ‘Pola,’” Denkschr. K. Akad. Wien, lxxiv., 1904.Google Scholar
(13)Treadwell, A. L., “Polychætous Annelids of Porto Rico,” Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., xx. 〈ii.〉, 1900.Google Scholar
(14)Malaquin, A., et Dehorne, A., “Annélides Polychètes de la Baie d'Amboine,” Revue Suisse Zool., xv., 1907.Google Scholar
(15)Fauvel, P., “Annélides Polychètes du Golfe Persique,” Arch. Zool. Expér. (5°), vi., 1911.Google Scholar