Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:00:25.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—Gemuendenaspis n.gen., an Arthrodiran Fish from the Lower Devonian Hunsrückschiefer of Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

R. S. Miles
R. S. Miles
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, King's College in theUniversity of Durham, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The unique specimen of Coccosteus angustus Traquair, from the Lower Devonian Hunsrückschiefer of Germany, is redescribed and referred to Gemuendenaspis n.gen. Previously unrecorded details of its morphology and a reconstruction are given. Its possession of both arctolepid and brachythoracic characters is confirmed and it is suggested that Gemuendenaspis should be referred to the family Gemuendenaspidæ nov., which closely approaches what would be expected in ancestors of the Coccosteidæ.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , 1962 , pp. 59 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bryant, W. L., 1929. “A New Coccosteus from The Portage Shales of Western New York”, Bull. N.Y. St. Mus., 281, 41–46.Google Scholar
Bryant, W. L., 1931. “Supplementary Note on Coccosteus angustus”, Bull. N.Y. St. Mus., 286, 153.Google Scholar
Denison, R. H., 1958. “Early Devonian Fishes from Utah, Part III. Arthrodira”, Fieldiana, Geol., 11, 461–551.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1932 a. “Die Arthrodira Wildungens”, Geol. Paläont. Abh., 19, 1–61.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1932 b. “Ein Wildunger Arthrodire in Nord Amerika”, Paläont. Z., 14, 46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, W., 1933 a. “Die unterdevonischen Fische und Gigantostraken von Overath”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 145, 41–77.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1933 b. “Die Wirbeltiere des rheinischen Devons”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 154, 1–83.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1937. “Die Wirbeltiere des rheinischen Devons II”, Abh. Preuss. Geol. Landesanst., 176, 5–83.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1938 a. “Über das Spinale und die angrenzenden Knochen der Brachythoraci”, Neues Jb. Min. Geol. Paläont., 79, 403–418.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1938 b. “Rhachiosteus pterygiatus n.gen. n.sp. (Euarthrodira, Brachythoraci)”, Decheniana, 97, 183–208.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1940. “Acanthodier und Placodermen aus Heterostius—Schichten Estlands und Lettlands”, Ann. Soc. Nat. Univ. Tartu, 46, 1–88.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1950. “Die paläontologische und stratigraphische Bedeutung der Wirbeltierfaunen des Old Reds und der marinen altpaläozoischen Schichten”, Abh. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berl., Math.-Nat. Kl., 1949, 1–130.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1960. “Tityosteus n.gen., ein Riesenarthrodire aus dem rheinischen Unterdevon”, Paläont. Z., 34, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintz, A., 1929 a. “Die downtonischen und devonischen Vertebraten von Spitzbergen, II Acanthaspida”, Skr. Svalb. og Ishavet, 22, 1–81.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1929 b. “Die downtonischen und devonischen Vertebraten von Spitzbergen, III Acanthaspida”, Skr. Svalb. og Ishavet, 23, 1–20.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1931. “Revision of the Structure of Coccosteus decipiens Ag.”, Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., 12, 291–313.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1932 a. “The Structure of Dinichthys”, Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Bashford Dean Mem. Vol., 4, 115–224.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1932 b. “Über einige Fischreste aus dem Hunsrückshiefer”, Z. Miner. Geol. Paläont., 1932, B, 572–582.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1933. “Some Remarks About the Structure of Phlyctœnaspis acadica Whiteaves”, Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., 14, 127–144.Google Scholar
Heintz, A., 1938. “Notes on Arthrodira”, Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., 18, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hills, E. S., 1936. “On Certain Endocranial Structures in Coccosteus”, Geol. Mag., 73, 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1911. Die Wirbertiere, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kulczycki, J., 1957. “Upper Devonian Fishes from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland)”, Acta Palœont. Polon., 2, 285–380.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W., and Westoll, T. S., 1952. “A Primitive Dipnoan Fish from the Lower Devonian of Germany”, Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 140, 403–420.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, H., 1841. The Old Red Sandstone, 1st Ed., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T., 1957. “Notes on Some Paleozoic Lower Vertebrates from Spitsbergen and North America”, Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr, 37, 285–353.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T., 1960. “New finds of Acanthodians, Arthrodires, Crossopterygians, Ganoids and Dipnoans in the Upper Middle Devonian Calcarieous Flags (Oberer Platten Kalk) of the Bergisch Gladbach—Paffrath Trough-pt 1”, Paläont. Z., 34, 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, A. S., 1945, Vertebrate Paleontology. Chicago.Google Scholar
Säve-Soderbergh, G., 1933. “The Dermal Bones of the Head and the Lateral Line System in Osteolepis macrolepidotus Ag. With Remarks on the Terminology of the Lateral Line System and on the Dermal Bones of Certain other Crossopterygians”, Nova. Acta. Soc. Sci. Upsal., 9, 1–129.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1944. “Contributions to the Knowledge of the Vertebrate Fauna of the Silurian and Devonian of Western Podolia II. Notes on Two Arthrodires from the Downtonian of Podolia”, Ark. Zool., 35A, 9, 1–83.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1945. “On the Heads of Certain Arthrodires II. On the Cranial and Cervical Joint of the Dolichothoraci (Acanthaspida)”, K. Svenska Vetensk Akad. Handl., 22, 1–70.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1948. “On the Placodermi of the Upper Devonian of East Greenland, 11. Antiarchi: Sub-family Bothrio-lepinæ”, Palœozoöl. Grenl., 2, 1–622.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1959. “On the Pectoral Fin and Shoulder Girdle of the Arthrodires”, K. Svenska Vetensk Akad. Handl., 8, 1–229.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1890. “On Phlyctœnius, a New Genus of Coccosteidæ”, Geol. Mag., 7, 308, 55.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1902. “On the Fossil Fishes of the Lower Devonian Roofing-slate of Gemünden in Germany”, Rep. Brit. Ass., 1902, 610.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1903. “The Lower Devonian Fishes of Gemünden”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 40, 723–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, C. D., 1954. “Catalogue of Type and Figured Specimens of Fossil Fishes and Amphibians in the Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh”, Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 16, 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1938. “On Rhamphodopsis, a Ptyctodont from the Middle Old Red Sandstone”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 59, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1945. “The Paired Fins of Placoderms”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1958. “The Lateral Fin-fold Theory and the Pectoral Fins of Ostracoderms and Early Fishes”, in Studies on fossil Vertebrates, ed. Westoll, T. S., London, Ch.X., 180–211.Google Scholar
White, E. I., 1952. “Australian Arthrodires”, Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Geol. 1, 251–304.Google Scholar