Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:33:42.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eocene Protohierodula crabbi Ross, 2019 cannot be reliably assigned to Manteidae (Insecta: Mantodea): A reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Andrew J. ROSS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I accept Schubnel & Nel's (2019) opinion that Protohierodula belongs to the clade Artimantodea, that it cannot be reliably assigned to the family Manteidae and should be regarded as family incertae sedis.

Keywords

ArtimantodeaInsect LimestoneIsle of WightMantoideapraying mantisPriabonian
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 110 , Issue 3-4: The Fauna and Flora of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, UK, Volume 2 , September 2019 , pp. 315 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ehrmann, R. 1999. Gottesanbeterinnen in Kopal und Bernstain (Insecta: Mantodea). Arthropoda 7, 2–8.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. 2003. A revision of Cretaceous mantises and their relationships, including new taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea). American Museum Novitates 3412, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. & Ross, A. J. 2017. Extraordinary Lagerstätten in Amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma. In Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D. (eds). Terrestrial conservation Lagerstätten: Windows into the evolution of life on land, 287–342. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. 1980. Fossil insects from the Bembridge Marls, Palaeogene of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series 33, 237–293.Google Scholar
Rivera, J. & Svenson, G. J. 2016. The Neotropical ‘polymorphic earless praying mantises' – Part I: molecular phylogeny and revised higher-level systematics (Insecta: Mantodea, Acanthopoidea). Systematic Entomology 41, 607–649.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J. 2019. The Blattodea (cockroaches), Mantodea (praying mantises) and Dermaptera (earwigs) of the Insect Limestone (late Eocene), Isle of Wight, including the first record of Mantodea from the UK. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. DOI: 10.1017/S1755691018000440.Google Scholar
Ross, A. J., Jarzembowski, E. A. & Brooks, S. J. 2000. The Cretaceous and Cenozoic record of insects (Hexapoda) with regard to global change. In Culver, S. J. & Rawson, P. F. (eds). Biotic response to global change, the last 145 million years, 288–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schubnel, T. & Nel, A. 2019. The Eocene Protohierodula crabbi Ross, 2019 cannot be reliably assigned to Manteidae (Insecta: Mantodea). Earth & Environmental Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. DOI: 10.1017/S1755691019000173.Google Scholar
Seyfullah, L. J., Beimforde, C., Dal Corso, J., Perrichot, V., Rikkenen, J. & Schmidt, A. R. 2018. Production and preservation of resins – past and present. Biological Reviews 93, 1684–1714.Google Scholar
Svenson, G. J. & Rodrigues, H. M. 2017. A Cretaceous-aged Palaeotropical dispersal established an endemic lineage of Caribbean praying mantises. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 284, 20171280.Google Scholar
Svenson, G. J. & Whiting, M. F. 2009. Reconstructing the origins of praying mantises (Dictyoptera, Mantodea): the roles of Gondwanan vicariance and morphological convergence. Cladistics 25, 468–514.Google Scholar
Zompro, O. 2005. Inter- and intra-ordinal relationships of the Mantophasmatodea, with comments on the phylogeny of polyneopteran orders (Insecta: Polyneoptera). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 89, 85–116.Google Scholar