Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:23:42.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An early actinopterygian ichthyofauna from the Scottish Lower Coal Measures Formation: Westphalian A (Bashkirian)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

Francis M. Elliott
Francis M. Elliott*
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ten new early actinopterygian taxa are described from material collected from five North Lanarkshire coal shale tips in the Midland Valley of Scotland. The newly described taxa include Rhadinichthys? ornatocephalum, Rhadinichthys glabrolepis, Pseudogonatodus aurulentum, Pseudohaplolepis argentatum, Rhadinichthys? plumosum and Lanarkichthys gardineri. Also included are the haplolepids Blairolepis wallacei, Parahaplolepis poppaea, Braccohaplolepis fenestratum and Andrewsolepis lochlani. Additional information was also obtained for a further two named species, Rhadinichthys monensis Egerton and Rhadinichthys grossarti Traquair. The material used for this study was obtained from finely laminated slabs of carbonaceous shale containing incomplete and disarticulated specimens, including isolated skull dermal elements and scales preserved en masse. Using this information, the dermal skull bones of a number of taxa were reconstructed and illustrated in dorsal and lateral views. Furthermore, morphological characteristics of the skull roof of each taxon was used to obtain an appropriate dataset, in order to undertake non-vigorous phylogenic analyses to demonstrate possible relationships between the various groups within the assemblage. In addition, ossified endocranial remains from specimens of Rhadinichthys monensis were examined.

Keywords

ActinopterygiianthraciticCarboniferousHaplolepidaeNorth LanarkshireRhadinichthyidaestratigraphic
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 107 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 351 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10. References

Agassiz, L. 1833–1844. Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles, 5 volumes. Neuchâtel : Imprimerie de Petitpierre et Prince. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 1978. Studies on Carboniferous freshwater fishes. American Museum Novitates 2641.Google Scholar
Bibron, M. 1846. Revue zoologique de la Société cuvierienne 9, 140.Google Scholar
Binney, E. W. 1841. On the fossil fishes from the Pendleton Coal Field. Transactions of the Manchester Geological Society 1, 153–178.Google Scholar
Bolton, H. 1904. The palaeontology of the Lancashire Coal Measures. Part 1. Transactions of the Manchester Geological and Mining Society 28(14).Google Scholar
Calver, M. A. 1969. Westphalian of Britain. 6e Congres Internationale Stratigraphie et Geologie Carbonifere. Sheffield 1967. Compte Rendu Vol. 1, 233–254.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. K., Falcon-Lang, H. J., Benton, M. J. & Grey, M. 2015. Early Pennsylvanian (Langsettian) fish assemblages from the Joggins Formation, Canada, and their implications for palaeoecology and palaeogeography. Palaeontology 58, 4, 661–690.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. 1998. Actinopterygians from the Namurian of Bearsden, Scotland, with comments on the early evolution of actinopterygian neurocrania. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 122(1–2), 27–59.Google Scholar
Coates, M. I. 1999. Endocranial preservation of a Carboniferous actinopterygian from Lancashire, U.K., and the interrelationships of primitive actinopterygians. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Biological Sciences 354(1382), 435–462.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871. Contribution to the ichthyology of the Lesser Antilles. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 14, 445–483.Google Scholar
Davis, J. W. 1878. On the occurrence of certain fish-remains in the Coal Measures, and the evidence they afford of fresh water origin. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society 7, 40–52.Google Scholar
Day, H. 1915. A note on the parasphenoid of a palaeoniscoid. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 16(8), 421–434.Google Scholar
Egerton, P. de M. G. 1850. Palichthyologic Notes. No.3. On the Ganoidei Heterocerci. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 6, 1–10.Google Scholar
Elliott, F. M. 2014. A new haplolepid fauna (Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii) from the Lower Coal Measures of Scotland: Westphalian A; Langsettian, Carbonicola communis chronozone (Bashkirian). Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 105(3), 207–225.Google Scholar
Falcon-Lang, H. J., Benton, M. J., Braddy, S. J. & Davies, S. J. 2006. The Pennsylvanian tropical biome reconstructed from the Joggins Formation of Canada. Journal of the Geological Society, London 163, 561–576.Google Scholar
Forsyth, I. H., Hall, I. H. S. & McMillan, A. A. 1996. Geology of the Airdrie district. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheet 31W (Scotland).Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1893. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteineder Permformation Böhmens 3(2), 1–132, figs 189–310, pls 91–132. Prague: F. Rivnác. (NB: whole volume is dated 1895.)Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. 1963. Certain palaeoniscoid fishes and the evolution of the snout in actinopterygians. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 8, 255–325.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. 1967. Further notes on palaeoniscoid fishes with a classification of the Chondrostei. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 14(5), 143–206.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G., Schaeffer, B. & Masserie, J. A. 2005. A review of the lower actinopterygian phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144, 511–525.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. & Schaeffer, B. 1989. Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes. Zooogical. Journal of the Linnean Society 97, 135–187.Google Scholar
Giles, S., Coats, M. I., Gaewood, R. J., Brazeau, M. D., Atwood, R., Johanson, Z. & Friedman, M. 2015. Endoskeletal structure in Cheirolepis (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii), an early ray-finned fish. Palaeontology 58(5), 849–870.Google Scholar
Grossart, W. 1868. On the Upper Coal Measures of Lanarkshire. Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow 3(1), 96–103.Google Scholar
Hancock, A. & Atthey, T. 1868. Notes on the remains of some reptiles and fishes from the shales of the Northumberland coal-field. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 1(4), 96–103.Google Scholar
Hancock, A. & Atthey, T. 1872. Descriptive notes on a nearly entire specimen of Pleurodus rankinii, on two new species of Platysomus and a new Amphicentrum, with remarks on a few other Fish remains found in the Coal-measures at Newsham. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9(4), 411–415.Google Scholar
Hoese, D. F. 1983. Sensory papilla patterns of the cheek lateralis system in the gobiid fishes Acentrogobius and Glossogobius, and their significance for the classification of gobioid fishes. Records of the Australian Museum 35, 195–222.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880, 649–662.Google Scholar
Long, J. A. 1988. New Palaeoniscoid fishes from the Late Devonian–Early Carboniferous of Victoria. Australia Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists 7, 1–64.Google Scholar
Lowney, K. A. 1980. A revision of the Family Haplolepidae (Actinopterygii, Paleonisciformes) from Linton, Ohio, (Westphalian D, Pennsylvanian). Journal of Palaeontology 54(5), 942–953.Google Scholar
Lowney, K. A. 1983. The earliest known (Namurian A, E1) haplolepids (Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 74, 69–78.Google Scholar
Lund, R. & Poplin, C. 1997. The Rhadinichthyids (Paleoniscoid Actinopterygians) from the Bear Gulch Limestone of Montana (USA, Lower Carboniferous). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17(3), 466–486.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. & Dyne, M. B. 1938. The actinopterygian fishes from the Lower Carboniferous of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 59, 437–480.Google Scholar
Pallas, P. S. 1814. Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica, sistens omnium animalium in extenso Imperio Rossico et adjacentibus maribus observatorum recensionem, domicilia, mores et descriptiones, anatomen atque icones plurimorum. Petropoli: [Unspecified Publisher]. vii+428 pp.Google Scholar
Poplin, C. 1984. Lawrenciella schaefferi n. g. n. sp. (Pisces: Actinopterygii) and the use of endocranial characters in the classification of the Palaeonisciformes. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4(3), 413–421.Google Scholar
Poplin, C. & Lund, R. 1995. Fates of the rostral, postrostral and premaxillary in the early history of actinopterygians. Geobios Mémoire Spécial 19, 225–230.Google Scholar
Poplin, C. & Veran, M. 1996. A revision of the actinopterygian fish Coccophalus wildi from the upper Carboniferous of Lancashire. In Milner, A. R. (ed.) Studies on Carboniferous and Permian Vertebrates. Special Papers in Palaeontology 52, 7–30. London: The Palaeontological Association. 148 pp.Google Scholar
Powell, J. H., Chisholm, J. I., Bridge, D. M., Rees, J. G., Glover, B. W. & Besly, B. M. 2000. Stratigraphical framework for Westphalian to early Permian red-bed successions of the Pennine Basin. British Geological Survey Technical Report WA/99/101.Google Scholar
Rayner, D. H. 1951. On the cranial structure of an early palaeoniscid, Kentuckia gen. nov. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 2, 53–83.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1945. Vertebrate Paleontology. Edition 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 687 pp.Google Scholar
Sallan, L. C. & Coates, M. I. 2013. Styracopterid (Actinopterygii) ontogeny and the multiple origins of post-Hangenberg deep-bodied fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169, 156–199.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. 1971. The braincase of the holostean fish Macrepistius, with comments on neurocranial ossification in the Actinopterygii. American Museum Novitates 2459, 1–34.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. & Dalquest, W. W. 1978. A palaeonisciform braincase from the Permian of Texas, with comments on cranial fissures and the posterior myodome. American Museum Novitates 2658, 1–15.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B. & Rosen, D. E. 1961. Major adaptive levels in the evolution of the actinopterygian feeding mechanism. American Zoologist 1, 187–204.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1874–1878. On Species of Rhadinichthys from the Coal-Measures. Procedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 4, 237–245.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1877–1914. The Ganoid fishes of the British Carboniferous formations. Palaeontological Society, Monograph 1877–1914, Parts 1–7, 1–186.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1881. Report on fossil fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland in Eskdale and Liddlesdale. Part 1, Ganoidei. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 30, 15–71.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1886. New Palaeoniscidae from the English Coal-Measures. No. I. Geological Magazine III 3, 440–442.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1888. New Palaeoniscidae from the English Coal-Measures. No. II. Geological Magazine III 5, 251–254.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E. & Weir, J. 1946. The British Carboniferous nonmarine lamellibranchia. Part I. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 434 (part of Volume 99), i–xxxii, 1–18, pls 1–4. London: The Palaeontographical Society.Google Scholar
Ward, J. 1875. On the organic remains of the Coal Measures of North Staffordshire, their range and distribution, with a catalogue of the fossils and their mode of occurrence. North Staffordshire Naturalists' Field Club 1875, 184–251.Google Scholar
Ward, J. 1890. The geological features of the North Staffordshire coalfields, their range and distribution, with a catalogue of the fossils of the Carboniferous System of North Staffordshire. Transactions of the North Staffordshire Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers 10, 1–189.Google Scholar
Ward, J. 1905. Palaeontology of the Pottery Coalfield. In The geology of the North Staffordshire Coalfields, Memoirs of the Geological Survey. England and Wales 1905, 285–337.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1925. The structure of certain palaeoniscids and the relationships of that group with other bony fishes. Procedings of the Zoological Society of London 1925, 815–870.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S. 1928. On some points in the structure of palaeoniscids and allied fish. Procedings of the Zoological Society of London 1928, 49–70.Google Scholar
Wellburn, E. D. 1899. On the Fish Fauna of the Lower Coal Measures of the Halifax and Littleborough Districts. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society 13, 419–432.Google Scholar
Wellburn, D. E. 1900. On Rhadinichthys monensis Egerton, and its distribution in the Yorkshire Coalfield. Geological Magazine (Decade IV) 7, 260–263.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S. 1944. The Haplolepidae, a new family of Late Carboniferous bony fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 83, 1–122.Google Scholar
White, E. I. 1939. A new type of palaeoniscoid fish, with remarks on the evolution of the actinopterygian pectoral fins. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London B 109, 41–61.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 1936. Fish Remains from the North Wales Coalfield. The Geological Magazine 73(11), 481–488.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1891. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History), London 2. London: The British Museum.Google Scholar